I Suggest Making All Semi-Auto with One-Shot Capabilities, with 10 Rounds Capacity Moved to BR3 for All Factions

dont forget the bullet dispersion system, the dispersion system ruins my experience with semi-auto, at first i thought im missing my every first shot but i notice it the longer i play this game.

why not make it simpler, BR2 - 5-6rounds, BR3 - 8-10rounds, BR4 - 15-20rounds, and 20-More(Fire Select)

2 Likes

Because as all guys know; it’s not about (magazine) size, it’s about how well it does the job.

There is a correlation, but it’s far from everything.

compared to the johnson and type 4 reload speed, g41 can barely perform well in aggressive play because of the slow reload speed

3 Likes

Indeed, which is why I think it deserves a damage increase to 12.7, and a reload down to 4.0 seconds, and increasing the Johnsons reload to 3.6.

2 Likes

also i hope they update the reload animation of g41 when fully empty

2 Likes

like what,

  1. rate of fire its a semi auto it already fire as fast as you can pull the trigger

  2. damage, there already asking for 10 shot semi autos to be one shot downs

  3. reload, not possible if the garand is loading 8 shells and the other 3 are stripper clip fed its going to be slower than a magazine fed

  4. sites. unless they give weapons like the SVT 38, SVT 40, G43, ZH29 worse sites there just as good

  5. accuracy, there semi autos unless you give them bolt action accuracy its a difference without meaning.

a. i guess they could give them more ammo for some reason

b. not my choice but limit bayonets to striper clip fed sa and the garand

c. a faster aim down sites again for reasons

otherwise if you have any ideas for a gun that
has the same damage, rof, accuracy but loads more slowly i am all ears

If the semi-automatics were more accurate it would be a great advance, if they move the 10-round ones to BR3 and add rifles with 20-round magazines for BR4 it would be interesting.

3 Likes

Another problem that would be fixed by BR5 getting cut in half and putting the top half into BR6

1 Like

Then we can move the garand, type 4 Johnson and g41 to br2 because no one has still explained to me how they compete at br3. Now br 2 and 1 can suffer instead of br4 great idea I love it instead of having br4 be broken let’s break every other br.

maybe

Ah yes the german agrumana or whatever it is called at br III lmao

Yeah that would be a great system, unfortunately the Armaguerra neither reloads fast nor has respectable Damage, and the same thing also extends to this G41 and its statistically identical bretheren.

BR III - 7 or more magazine size (max 10, would be amenable to 15), slow clip reloads only, good damage.

no the m1 garand is not equal to the g43, as long as like the g41 its stripper clip fed 10 or 15 total rounds is fine, why the garand has to load more often but guns like the g41 would be slower to fully reload. besides what other semi auto is over 6 but under 10 rounds. sorry but unless for a 10 round mag its 20% or more slow than the garand and nearly twice as slow for a 15 round magazine. sorry but this just wont math to be balanced unless they have a comically slow reload or the garand is crazy fast.

Not to mention the ussr has two 10 shot sa mag and Germany has one while Japan and US have zero in there tech tree. The US has the right garand and stripper clip Johnson, Japan has a stripper clip fed type 4. So at the very least Japan and would need a new br3 rifle the zh29 by way of china would be fine but the US would be a problem and no the garand with a bayo et is not good enough.

of course i could be wrong but in that case that is the way is already,
like the g41 is 10 rounds and the french resistance gun is 15 stripper clip fed which both fit at br3. the g43 which uses a magazine is not fit for b at least the same br3 that g41 or garand would share.

Which is why the G41 deserves a buff (as I previously stated), and either a nerf to the Fedorov (for being yet another powercrept BR II Soviet weapon) or a buff to the Armaguerra.

The Armaguerra was respectable, when compared to the M1 Carbine.

Still, this is overwhealmingly the system that is generally in place inside the game already, except for some very odd and unfair balancing descisions that deliberately only targets the Germans for some reason.

dont be that guy
yes the ussr is enlisted golden child
but the delusion that Germany is weaker than the USSR is true
that there weaker than the US is that a delusion
the us has just as many weaknesses
example the 30rd thompson is
op at br2, balanced at br3 and underpowered at br4
if you are a german player you are in the middle
USSR is on top humiliating Germany
Germany Humiliates US, and US humiliates Japan
dont play the victim it does not suit you
besides where was youre sympathy when
the fg42 was humiliating the m2 carbine and before the us had the hyde 44, or the pershing and super pershing and germany was not fighting the us at br4/5 but humiliating it or did you consider that ‘fair’

Armaguerra was OP, because it killed with one shot (not against Soviets tho cuz body armor), I even preferred it over G41 because it reloaded faster.

I hoped for a M1 Carbine rate of fire buff, and a Armaguerra dmg buff to ignore body armor, but instead we got a Soviet 15.3 dmg rifle - which is crazy considering not even G41 has 15.3 dmg.

1 Like

Obviously it wasnt fair. Thats why the murricans became excellent hvar spammers.
Now, the infantry field is “balanced” but the murrican air superiority remains.

Close to balanced but the kingtiger is still better then the sp, second they can fix he problem.in the same speedy manner the fixed German superiority so it should be fixed in 12 to 18 more months.

While the other faction enjoys uncontested air superiority having better tank is like giving one faction better sniper rifles and the other faction gets better knifes but no sniper rifle at all.