from my experience, i think 10 rounds semi-auto’s optimal BR placement is BR3.
it’s not a power creep, it’s a good compromise.
a good BR4 semi-auto rifle needs to have a One-Shot Capabilities and at least have 20 rounds and no fire selection.
4 Likes
AND MAKING WEAPONS LIKE
THE G41
JOHNSON 1941
TYPE 4
GARAND
either garbage or b tier
now the first three can be fixed just reverting them to a single load
but what saves the garand
also the johnson is not a weapon that can be single loaded at least not the one in game
nor the type 4 or g41 but altering those would be far easier and believable
no a negligibly better damage nor a bayonet is not good enough for the garand
i guess having a 15 to 30 percent better reload could work but people would complain
1 Like
Or they could just have better stats than their 10 round detachable magazine counterparts? It means you can choose either higher functionality, or more consistency and ease-of-use.
2 Likes
The current system works fine, the only problem right now is the sudden power-level jump in rifles from BR IV to BR V, which a hard BR V seperation would solve.
BR II - 6 or less magazine size, slow reload but respectable damage or fast reload but low damage.
BR III - 7 or more magazine size (max 10, would be amenable to 15), slow clip reloads only, good damage.
BR IV - 10 or more magazine size (sky’s the limmit here), fast magazine reloads only, good damage.
BR V - 15 or more magazine size (sky’s the limmit here), fast magazine reloads only, only BR allowed to have Select-Fire rifles, good damage.
Gimmics can exist, like low damage rifles that break the other requirements just to be a lower BR, but it’s a good basic system they’ve already got. I’m honestly fine with the 20-round premiums, you just don’t feel it in BR IV when one or two bullets will always kill someone and one mag is already enough to squadwipe, if not the quick reloads will have you covered and the higher capacity mags can get a slower reload speed.
And, speaking as a avid Hino rifle enjoyer, I do feel dirty at how good it is in BR III and it perhaps shouldn’t be there, it’s got the same damage of its other Japanese peers but with a large magazine, quick reload speed and insane recoil.
1 Like
dont forget the bullet dispersion system, the dispersion system ruins my experience with semi-auto, at first i thought im missing my every first shot but i notice it the longer i play this game.
why not make it simpler, BR2 - 5-6rounds, BR3 - 8-10rounds, BR4 - 15-20rounds, and 20-More(Fire Select)
2 Likes
Because as all guys know; it’s not about (magazine) size, it’s about how well it does the job.
There is a correlation, but it’s far from everything.
compared to the johnson and type 4 reload speed, g41 can barely perform well in aggressive play because of the slow reload speed
3 Likes
2 Likes
also i hope they update the reload animation of g41 when fully empty
2 Likes
like what,
-
rate of fire its a semi auto it already fire as fast as you can pull the trigger
-
damage, there already asking for 10 shot semi autos to be one shot downs
-
reload, not possible if the garand is loading 8 shells and the other 3 are stripper clip fed its going to be slower than a magazine fed
-
sites. unless they give weapons like the SVT 38, SVT 40, G43, ZH29 worse sites there just as good
-
accuracy, there semi autos unless you give them bolt action accuracy its a difference without meaning.
a. i guess they could give them more ammo for some reason
b. not my choice but limit bayonets to striper clip fed sa and the garand
c. a faster aim down sites again for reasons
otherwise if you have any ideas for a gun that
has the same damage, rof, accuracy but loads more slowly i am all ears
If the semi-automatics were more accurate it would be a great advance, if they move the 10-round ones to BR3 and add rifles with 20-round magazines for BR4 it would be interesting.
3 Likes
Another problem that would be fixed by BR5 getting cut in half and putting the top half into BR6
1 Like
Then we can move the garand, type 4 Johnson and g41 to br2 because no one has still explained to me how they compete at br3. Now br 2 and 1 can suffer instead of br4 great idea I love it instead of having br4 be broken let’s break every other br.
maybe
Ah yes the german agrumana or whatever it is called at br III lmao
Yeah that would be a great system, unfortunately the Armaguerra neither reloads fast nor has respectable Damage, and the same thing also extends to this G41 and its statistically identical bretheren.
BR III - 7 or more magazine size (max 10, would be amenable to 15), slow clip reloads only, good damage.
no the m1 garand is not equal to the g43, as long as like the g41 its stripper clip fed 10 or 15 total rounds is fine, why the garand has to load more often but guns like the g41 would be slower to fully reload. besides what other semi auto is over 6 but under 10 rounds. sorry but unless for a 10 round mag its 20% or more slow than the garand and nearly twice as slow for a 15 round magazine. sorry but this just wont math to be balanced unless they have a comically slow reload or the garand is crazy fast.
Not to mention the ussr has two 10 shot sa mag and Germany has one while Japan and US have zero in there tech tree. The US has the right garand and stripper clip Johnson, Japan has a stripper clip fed type 4. So at the very least Japan and would need a new br3 rifle the zh29 by way of china would be fine but the US would be a problem and no the garand with a bayo et is not good enough.
of course i could be wrong but in that case that is the way is already,
like the g41 is 10 rounds and the french resistance gun is 15 stripper clip fed which both fit at br3. the g43 which uses a magazine is not fit for b at least the same br3 that g41 or garand would share.
Which is why the G41 deserves a buff (as I previously stated), and either a nerf to the Fedorov (for being yet another powercrept BR II Soviet weapon) or a buff to the Armaguerra.
The Armaguerra was respectable, when compared to the M1 Carbine.
Still, this is overwhealmingly the system that is generally in place inside the game already, except for some very odd and unfair balancing descisions that deliberately only targets the Germans for some reason.
dont be that guy
yes the ussr is enlisted golden child
but the delusion that Germany is weaker than the USSR is true
that there weaker than the US is that a delusion
the us has just as many weaknesses
example the 30rd thompson is
op at br2, balanced at br3 and underpowered at br4
if you are a german player you are in the middle
USSR is on top humiliating Germany
Germany Humiliates US, and US humiliates Japan
dont play the victim it does not suit you
besides where was youre sympathy when
the fg42 was humiliating the m2 carbine and before the us had the hyde 44, or the pershing and super pershing and germany was not fighting the us at br4/5 but humiliating it or did you consider that ‘fair’