choose the option how you feel about the new selection of maps below in the comments
2 Likes
I like changes
6 Likes
I am against it
4 Likes
I like changes with Berlin and Moscow. Maps of these campaigns are going to be fine for all BRs. They still need some improvements though.
What I really don’t like is decision to make Tunisia maps available for all BRs. Most of them would need a total rework to be even interesting to play. Currently they’re just annoying to play.
1 Like
Well it gets coupled with the preferred map system - so in theory it could make people play what ever they want - but whats the point in playing low BR, when low BR isnt representing early war anymore? I dont know, I really like the 1940 - 1942 setting, because thats when it wasn’t obvious that Germany would lose the war, by 1943 the war was practically decided.
But thats just me I guess…
2 Likes
If i get the option to totally ban the entire campaign, I would have no complaints.
But if there’s going to be always some chance I can get Tunisia with a lineup I couldn’t get it with before. It’s just a change for the worse for me, obviously
The maps in Tunisia just don’t suit me and I’m not enjoying them. And I definitely don’t feel that so called “HE spam” is the biggest problem with them.
1 Like
Seems a bit extreme, every campaign has its fair share of good and bad maps.
Im sure you hate swamp map and probably Ver Sur Mer too.
No, it’s not. I honestly don’t like a single Tunisian map.
If I leave out the tunnel village (worst map in the game) and the map with the main straight road in town. (That’s probably the only one I don’t actively dislike, but it’s still extremely uninteresting and one dimensional)…
…Tunisia maps are very similar to Battle of the Bulge gameplay wise, but with a much more repetitive and one-dimensional environment.
Plus Battle of the Bulge has much more interesting urban sections that are really fun to play.
Yeah, but not because of swamp itself. But because it’s conquest mode map. And conquest mode is extremely frustrating to play solo.
I dont mind this one.
1 Like
Ver Sur only sucks if you have to start from the beach or have to play the mode with the two objectives.
2 Likes
Assault is yet another mode that’s extremely painfull to play solo.
They should just make a separate MM queue for groups. And make assault and conquest only be present there.
1 Like
I know you hate me but i love Br 2 in Berlin.
It’s Fantastic
I played too much Berlin, cant imagine how annoyed BR5 Soviets must be to play the same maps over and over again.
In other words, I bet this whole idea comes specifically from the Russian forum and Soviet mains that want to play other maps.
Why not instead add more maps? There are multiple 1944 locations in eastern Europe that can have very unique gameplay.
I stand by my opinion that the game should have a total of just 3 BRs:
-BR1 early war gear and maps
-BR2 late war gear and maps
-BR3 total mayhem, all maps, prototypes, assault rifles, semi post war gear.
In such BR3 then you should be able to vote and ban maps - but not in BR1 and BR2, because those are supposed to be authentic with “semi fitting” time periods and locations.
1 Like
Im in the middle. I am happy that i finally get to experience berlin without assault rifle, jet fighter and heavy tank spam but on the other hand some low br maps dont suit high br like tunisia oasis. I have noticed that berlin is really common in low br now (i suppose it is because of the testing period). I hope it will not be too common in the future or else it will get stale.
I stopped caring about historical accuracy in normal matches after the merge came and immersion being damaged doesnt matter to me. I just wish we finally got that promised equipment selector for custom matches + limited xp earnings for dev approved mods so historical accuracy enthusiasts would have somewhere to stay.
But overall i dont really care if these changes happen or not
- I like Moscow BR4-5, but it still need some reworks
Fortified district has one unfair vehicle spawn with one of them being completely exposed from all sides it needs some protection.
Quarry need more cover and objectives in different areas so tanks wouldn’t be so powerful.
Maisky is pretty crap when you are a tanker, not only you will get spawncamped on first and 2nd obj but also third only right side can be attacked, while left is a suicidal path. Infantry has also difficult time crossing the river need some bridges or boats from the left side.
- I like Berlin BR1-2
However there need to make some new cover for rallies as those matches are ultra slow atm with all that running and people not being to instantly wipe out your squad
- Not big fan of Tunisia BR5
Maps should be either reworked to not promote planes, tanks and AR/AF spam or only make them playable up to BR4. A lot of the objectives can only be entered from the side and be completely exposed to the enemy team.
if i want to play berlin i must play low br
and if i want to play moskow i must play high br
tecnically we switched places lol
I agree. I really like this BR map change too. I missed my Fedorov in Moscow
With the incoming chose preferred maps abilty i think even those who dont like it wouldnt suffer too hard from it.
If they go along with this “You can play any map at any BR” decision then they need to wait to officially release it until they can add a “Preferred map” system along with it.
1 Like
There is no new selection. They just regurgitated content with no real intent to make the game better.