The m2 has 30/60, although this is still strange, as it should be 30+30.
Although you know, the developers don’t give a shit about the rules. AVT brought back 3 stores, although there is no reason to have 3. A normal rifle should have 30 rounds or 2 magazines, whichever is greater
1 Like
Smaller caliber rifles like the M2 Carbine, the V.G 1.5 and the MkB 42 all have 120 rounds because the devs consider them on par with large caliber SMGs like the Thompson. The only exceptions to this are the M1 Carbine and the Sniper MkB 42 with 15/60 and 30/60 respectively.
The m2 has 90 rounds, not 120. This has been the case since its introduction.
Explain why the AVT has 45 rounds, when it should be 30.
Mkb 35 has 100 rounds instead of 120, explain why?
The rules do not work very often
M2 carbine has 120 with it being 30/90. I literally have one on every American trooper in Normandy right now, so I would know. They changed it a while back to line up with the standard they set for themselves. As for the AVT and the MkB 35, I honestly have no idea why those don’t have their proper count but just because one gun does not meet the regulation is not an excuse to make every other gun not meet it.
Now the U.S. has a full mp43 ammo on every soldier with a m2? Great balance.
First they say that there should not be enough ammo to play without an engineer, and then they give 120 ammo to any soldier
1 Like
Don’t know where they said that, but the M2 carbine is fine for balance in it’s current state. It excels at CQC, while the FG 42 is the more well rounded gun. It’s lime the MkB 42 to AVT 40 in Stalingrad except both have been nerfed to a degree.
120 - ammo is enough to play without an ammo bag, 40 at Fg or 30 at AVS is not enough.
At one time the developers claimed that soldiers’ weapons should be limited in ammunition.
Why then don’t other rifles like fg, avs get 4 magazines like m2 and not 2?
I think the fg42 should have the same damage as the m2 carbine, and the ammunition balance will be more balanced, the fg42 with 12 damage I feel is better than the m2 gun.
Even the m2 is good in close combat. But the reticle is terrible and there is a lot of bounce. So I think if fg42 should have same ammo as m2 and same damage as m2 but fg42 will have slower firing speed. I would suggest that it should be at 550-600 and the m2 should be at 750-800. Some people may ask why it shoots so fast. Because if you shoot slowly, you won’t be able to fight anyone. You should at least shoot fast in order to fight well in close quarters. If adjusted as I said would be good As for the total number of nerfs of fg42 ammunition is reduced. I think it’s a really bad idea. They couldn’t solve the problem. They should adjust gun performance, not overall ammunition.
I recommend you to play the m2 by yourself. The gun is very difficult to play. Good only at close range I would like to say the same words as in the case of m1919 ah6. You should go play for yourself to know the reason why they adjusted the amount of m2 ammunition more than they should.
But if you’re lazy, I’ll share my experience with m2 guns.
- Killing with an m2 gun is very difficult in the medium to long range because it has a very bad aiming center.
- The damage of the gun personally if fighting at medium-long range, if choosing between m2 and m1 I chose the m1 carbine because it has less recoil and better centering.
- You can kill enemies with this gun. It took about 10 shot ever. I’m not joking 10 rounds true at close range because you’ll waste a lot of ammo trying to aim with this gun the muzzle of the gun will overshadow your reticle if you’re lucky maybe 5 shot. It’s very difficult to kill an enemy using 3-4 shots because it has a bad aiming center.
All in all, this gun the real problem is that the gun’s aiming center is bad but has a high firing speed, so it’s suitable for close range where close combat requires a lot of ammunition because of the high chance of misses.
If from all I said, you still don’t believe it, go play yourself in the game. To know if it’s true from what I said
If I wrote it wrong, I’m sorry. I have some business to do. I don’t have time to come and check.
bro what. these are real guns from ww2 that the devs have tried to implement in the game in a way that would make them as much like they are in real life as possible. you cant just make the 7.92×57mm Mauser (rifle caliber) fg 42 have the same damage as the M2 carbine which is shooting what is pretty much just pistol rounds. its retarded. it would be like balancing the tiger by replacing the 88mm cannon with a 50mm. would it better balance wise? maybe. but it wouldnt be a fucking tiger anymore, it would be fiction
i get that the m2 is bad compared to the fg 42. but the solution you just proposed is just so unbelievably stupid
3 Likes
These games are not made to be that realistic. Even America uses British guns. Do you think this is true? And the weapon size of this game is not historically realistic and you think that changing the ammo damage to make the game more balanced would be impossible?
And you should go and learn better manners. I’m just commenting that it is possible and not nonsense. But you think it’s ridiculous to think that way is not wrong. But it’s your fault for cursing me. You shouldn’t look down on people you don’t know. If I see you in front of me I will definitely punch you in the face.
Don’t be a problem The Internet was the first place to change the opinions of ordinary people. if you are not satisfied with anything You shouldn’t look down on other people like this. if very dissatisfied What you should do is not reply and leave this page.
Because I don’t want to fight with people like you, it’s a waste of time.
this game is made to be historically accurate. they have hads to make some small “adjustments” to make gameplay more balanced and enjoyable. but fundamentally changing a gun to the point where it doesnt even remotely resemble its real life counterpart (halfing damage and firerate) is way to far. its so far beyond anything done in this game for balance that anyone in this community with over 2 braincells would also call you retarded (and justifiably so). and if you are okay with that sort of thing you are playing the wrong genre of games
i have nothing against you in particular, i just think we should call an apple and apple and call out retardation where we find it
2 Likes
I won’t mind you if you communicate politely, but what you’re doing is no different from a loser who wants to win the internet.
I don’t want to waste time answering your point. because you can’t speak politely And why do I have to waste time talking to the rubbish in society?
Nice dodge buddy. Totally proved me wrong by calling me rude
You go back and look at your message. although there are not many But I think it’s rude. because this is the first time you talk to me But you choose to include rudeness as well. you don’t respect others
40 rounds for the FG or 30 rounds for the AVS is consistent to that the devs have stated for ammo standardization, and it should be enough if you have trigger control.
I haven’t seen that one before, can you point me in the direction?
Because of ammo standardization. The FG used to have more ammo but it was nerfed because it was blatantly OP. It is fine in it’s current state.