Guerilla squad makes no sense

Bro I wish I got guys in the bottom with those types of stats

they still sucked lol

And they’re better then most the teams I get so does it matter?

not really

15/12 with zero obj play isn’t what i would exactly call good

why dont u send the full screen shot??? afraid to leak your team as a HE spammer team

Not good but it’s better then what I get usually

My teammates don’t get the kills or build rallies just me

You have it in video :sleeping:

this guy didn’t get kills or build rallies lmfao, i was literally in the game from that ss, all 4 were total gabro

that ur team is bad and just HE spamming yea nice

to be fair, it’s only 1/2 of your teams stats shown

My team is like 1/4 of those states usually again I wish they have those stats

cool

So good, so bad. Watched IDK four, and two were quick because you deserted for reasons I don’t know and care because desertion is about to everyone’s own responsibility (and maybe its due to technical or private matters). Maybe I also missed specific replays, I don’t know and I honestly don’t really care.
Anyway:

  • I would say almost 80% of the shot fired with the Type 5 were a clear miss. The hits were not impressive either. You need four or five shots to destroy an M2A4 from IDK 100m max. The M13 from less than 50m distance wasn’t impressive either. The Shermans were not that far away either in most cases and you missed them all. Didnt saw the 76mm Sherman but I don’t think it would improve the data here.
  • Almost all tanks were within the range that Guerrillas could have effectively used as well, as it was not the “deep” grey zone or in terms of combat distance. Some were not even in greyzones to begin with.

So, based on this, I still don’t see improved efficiency for Japanese partisans if they get their bad AT launchers that, apparently even used by a pro player, have poor accuracy on “range”, and 9/10 don’t even face those tanks camping in the super-grey zone (or in theoretical ranges)

Definitely not based on the TTK or general accuracy. I had too high expectations in that case, apparently.

I don’t know
 maybe because for
 fun? Because I like using different squad? Not just the same meta stuff only.
I mean I can also just give everyone the same boring-ass loadout with the same weapon and spam AP mines for the sake of sweating, but then I might as well play an actual sweating game, that isn’t a worse War Thunder with infantry with the worst bots since the latest Ubisoft release.
If you need to spam meta to kill dumbass bots, okay I guess.
And if that is your best argument against my err gameplay, that I not only use SF rifles and mines for every soldier


ouch?

Even based on your replays, BR5 matches are plagued with low-BR tanks and stuff. And also, based on kill feed, most people in those matches still deploy basic rifles and such for the most part. How likely is it that every dude on the enemy team has a full BR5 sweating loadout? If you constantly encounter that (which is not true given on your replays), might as well go to Las Vegas.
Also, weapons gaps are not really that concerning. A dude with an M2 still dies about the same to an Type 100 Paratrooper SMG as to the Japanese Proto SF with M16 stats (especially since the user is most likely AI). They don’t have Soviet bias after all. It’s not like with tanks or planes (and even here, German sweaters sometimes still deploy the IAR in high BR matches because of its bombs).
Not to mention the most important thing: 95% of your (and mine) kills are bots that are partially deliberately programmed by the developers to be useless. So, in general, I would not pose so much with kills and such if your enemy is basically made to serve as cannon fodder.

So I can also miss 80% of my rocket shots and need five hits to kill M2A4 despite claiming to be an expert on this weapon?
Or is RNG to blame again?

I see you not only can’t read but also can’t see. In the three pacific matches I played yesterday, there are footage of long range shoots against Calliope with type 4/type 5, Jumbo with type 5, Sherman 76m with type 5.You choose to ignore all of them. I reliably hit them within two shoots, and all of the targets are at least 100m away. Shameless of you to even claim that I have missed 80% of my shots. Pls show your footstage of at rockets always one shoot one kill.

Oh, because you literally have nothing unlocked past br3? Dude, how about actually grind the faction before you make a claim? All of your squad are made of premium squad and GO weapons. Yep, genius to use type 100 medic squad against t20. All of your statements are automatically disqualified because you don’t even have Japan br5 unlocked. You don’t even have a normal squad with more than four soldiers in it. What makes you think you are eligible to comment? Oh, people are sweatlords for bring br5 weapons to br 5. Hey, at least, I can choose to bring whatever I want to battle.You have nothing high br unlocked and still yapping.

Because damage model of light tanks are weird sometimes. First of time playing the game?






You can continue to shamelessly lie whatever you want.

Yes. 10sh meters with good angles.

It is very obvious that you don’t know to flank and practice your skills.

Yes?

True dude. Maybe try not using premium type hei lmg and noob tube next time fighting br5 allies, see how many you can kill with your godly type 100 smg (early).

I only watched four, and again, you deserted two of them. I dont care if there are more, really. If we need to cherry pick replays, this is not something you do/ happens to you all the time, wich iirc was the entire joke of me asking for replays.

I dont know. I think picking the four most recent ones is fair since, in your opinion, you do that constantly. But granted, I didn’t expect to see you quit 50% of the chosen replays/ matches.

You claimed to know the perfect aiming mechanics, etc., so I didn’t expect five hits from you to destroy an M2A4 at short range (including misses).

I dont know. I think my Jap replays also include usage of BR4 rifles and SMGs and planes so I dont know what you are trying to make here. I dont want to only play Type Hei M16, the paras already troll enough with their shielded M16.
I think is funnier that you complain about my arsenal and not about skill here, so again


ouch?

Because a) everyone is using T20 (especially with Japanese matchmaking that puts BR3, BR4 and BR5 together) and b) everyone is a player and not a goddamn bot and c) flanking people with the Type 100 etc. matters less if he uses a different weapon in his hand because it changes his HP I guess.
I mean, just look at the kill feeds from time to time. I think I see more M1903 Springfields than T20s.

Kinda, yes, putting AP mines in every soldier and use the same stuff is pretty much sweating. That and the urgent need to prove some random on the internet how skillfull he is because that is apparently more important to show than explaining why Guerillias need rocket launchers.

Dont have that issue but I usually aim for the crew or the ammo. Maybe try that one out? But to be fair, you also missed at least two shots on the M2A4 iirc.

And the range of the T34 was this super-greyzone range you wouldn’t reach with Guerillia? That isnt 100m, at best around 50m, probably less.

For the 6:40 timestamp of the 17:02 replay.


After the second hit or so, you did hit the tank, but you didn’t destroy it. Another dude destroyed it.
For the 12:46 replay:

The Pershing was destroyed by a tank. You hit the engine or so after two hits.

You didn’t destroy the 76mm Sherman, but by a plane. You hit it, but one hit out of seven rockets (also, you didn’t kill any crew member)? Also, was this the super-duper long-range where those super-grey zone tanks are camping, according to you, which you can’t reach with Guerilla?
And you didnt destroy any tank in that match.

Maybe there were more hits when you tried to snipe the 76mm Sherman, but I dont care enough to check on it.

So, based on these, you shot 7+2+2 = 11 rockets on ranges we can assume are roughly 100m, maybe a bit more, a bit more.
And 1+1+1 = 3 hits.
Based on two matches.
= “Long”-range accuracy of 27,27%.

(And no destroyed tank and only one killed crew member btw.)

Edit: The 76mm were six missed shots.
So now it would be
10 Misses
3 Hites
= 33,33% accuracy.

How many replays do I need to watch to have these numbers increase?

Which refers to meters belows 100m, which fits since all tank kills of yours were within that range.

It is also very obvious that you didn’t kill the tanks at 100m, which you know, which is you maybe didn’t show the kill feed for the other tanks but only for the T34 (or it wasn’t intentional, but u®just weird coincidence). All the other tanks were killed less than 50m away from you, which doesn’t really sound like those super-long ranges where you encounter the grey zone campers you can’t reach as Guerillia (and even on those ranges, you missed shots and had to hit it multiple times)

Or mabye there are better replays, but based on sheer likability, I shouldnt be forced to pick chosen replays to make you prove your point.

No.

First you complain that I dont use enough meta stuff and now you want the opposite?
For what? To defend your honour and pride on killing bots?

Damn, you are so dumb to count and watch dates? Can you even check the date of replays?

Didn’t feel like playing Japan that day so I went to Germany instead. Magically, it became a point for argument, as I clearly said my last three games.

Becuase you literally have nothing else other than premium and GO weapons? Oh, and noob tube. Haha. Skill of noobtubing and sit your ass on an aa?

Because fewer good players play br5 Allies nowadays, especially against Japan, whose team is almost always stacked. Yea, you won’t know because you don’t play Japan. And that give you the confidence to think you can match actual br5 players with t20. Delusional

Daydreaming again.

You are saying as if it is your first time watching the effect of rockets against abandoned tank. After two shots, 3 of the 4 crews dead, and the last one jumped out. I continue to fire at it only to get the confirmed vehicle kill for more points.

Tell me how are you going to reach it with enemy infantry surrounding it? You are just plain dumb at this point.

I didn’t even claim I destroyed it. I demonstrated that I could consistently hit distanced sideshots, which you believe could not be done by cheats. Watch the replay closely, you can also see I am not the only one firing rockets and chasing marked targets. Everyone is doing their jobs. What to complain? Or soomehow you think your guerrillas can kill it quicker?

Again. For demonstration purposes that I can consistently hit longshots. Can’t pen Pershing’s side from that angle, and I can’t see clearly whether it is a Pershing or Jumbo as there is another Jumbo behind it.

Because long range shots are difficult, especially with type 5. What’s your point? Have you ever tried fausting t3485 across Moltke Bridge? Sometimes you just can’t get good damage because of the angle of falling projectiles and rng. Again, I don’t know what you are trying to disapprove. The answer is just plain and simple firing more shots and more practice. If I fail all the shots, unlucky day/skill issue, so what? Use planes/tanks/at guns or try again with another squad. Again, I just want to know how you can do better with guerrillas and why guerrillas with at rockets won’t do better.

Dude, are you high? Teach me how to reach that Sherman with guerrillas under normal circumstances. Do you even know the map. It is only possible if the enemy team consist of bots and your team are literally camping outside their default vehicle spawn.

Again, something is seriously wrong with your eyes. First, that Sherman 76m is at least 150-200m away. Secondly, how did you only see 3 hits? Tell me first how many hits I score on that Calliope. I hit distant sideshot in all the 3 games, which to you was impossible. Somehow it is not consistent.

Its you literally don’t have any br5 gears. You don’t have the experience to comment on br5 gameplay, and clearly you don’t know the Pacific maps very well. If you have everything unlocked and leveled up, but still choose to play those gears. I will not have a single issue. Don’t pretend you are playing for fun. The only reason you play br5 with that lineup is because you desperately want to get in br5 games to prove a point, and that is the best you got. There is a big difference between don’t use meta and can’t use meta.

Man, stop lying and look what you have written. So in German, 10ish means 100?

Now, even you are contradicting your lies.

Keep the conversation civil and respectful.

Last four replays. Dont know why you don’t understand that one. Maybe you made new ones in the meantime but did you know that replays don’t upload instantly but take a while to get on the website?

Also applies to the Japanese. Plenty of Arisakas and BR 2-3 LMGs.

I don’t know. Maybe that explains why you needed so many shots.

Still five shots.

Was this even your initial counterargument?
And well, I guess shoot them?

27 to 33% ain’t consistent.

Didn’t you initially complain that Guerrillas suck because they can’t kill those super common super-greystone tanks?

Again. 27 to 33% ain’t consistent.

But I thought you could adjust the angle.

I don’t know. What is yours?

Again, I don’t think you know what you wrote one paragraph ago.

So much for consistent I guess.
Also, this again shows the lack of benefit of giving Japanese Guerillias rocket launchers to counter super-grey zone tanks.

Do you mean Guerillas can’t reach a tank that is 50m away behind CP? Okay I guess.

And what does it change in terms of numbers? Your range quota is still not high enough to name it consistently. The range does not matter at all.

Too bored so nah.
But its funny that this was the Type4 and not the Type5. So, I don’t know how that even matters for the accuracy of the Type5.

Prove otherwise (because I don’t care enough to also watch the replay of the tanker). You only hit the 76mm once, the Pershin once and the other Sherman once.

I didn’t say impossible iirc. I suggested that the chances are not very high, let alone the chance to kill, and based on your poor hit ratio, you proved the point.

Because you put mouths in my mouth. I never said impossible. You are the first one who says impossible.

And that is bad if I shoot down planes?

How exactly?
I just didn’t saw the initial 1+1 hits of the Shermans because they didn’t trigger kills and replays don’t show post-pen cams in replays and didn’t watch the T34 replay because I am not gonna watch all of your replays because we need to pimp your accuracy shots.