Strictly speaking, it refers to those who refuse to think or are passive in confrontation
They refuse to think or inquire about how to fight and avoid their enemies
and allow those vehicles to continue killing themselves or their equally incompetent teammates.
(Of course sometimes I don’t want to help those idiots
When there are too many of them, it makes me feel tired and powerless.)
Sadly I didnt join the Enlisted HA Facebook group or the FLAGGOT Rocket Man show because they maybe do all those advanced smoke-grenade-bait-greyzoneflank-destroycannonandtracks shit because the rest of us plebs just use tanks, planes and Fäuste to kill greyzone tanks.
You clearly know that the enemy will use heavy armored units to hide in the distance and massacre you.
But you still choose to use anti-tank rifles, explosive charges and small-caliber tanks?
I really think the problem is with people who refuse to adapt
those players arent really expected to fight tanks. idk if det pack is even unlocked at BR1. also you play first few battles against other newbies and bots so when you are in real MM they are close to researching BR2 weapons.
well i agree that f2p need another slot for vehicle, but that vehicle with few exceptions (e.g. default tank like pz2) can usually kill most br2 and br3 tanks.
you get that equipment rather fast. you get AT soldier for 5000xp (basically 2-3 battles for bad f2p players) and you get engineer for 25k xp.
3+1 is enough
They should make choices and be responsible for them
rather than asking for more
Is this all?
Just some marking and whatever this means:
Not really impressive or deep and markings of other people is optional for planes depending on maps.
if this is combined arms game, then everyone should have access to both ground and air vehicles. i am not afraid of competition, are you?
Google Translate can’t figure out what you’re saying
If it’s convenient, maybe you can change the grammar to something more suitable for Chinese translation.
I mean sometimes there is not really a choice to deal with a greyzone camper. Either you are ill-equipped or choosing to deal with the camper via Vehicles would lead to ur team losing the CP, so it becomes a loss-loss scenario.
Sadly that applies mainly to tanker mains, since those guys like to never use commander’s view and care not for any marks other than tanks. Mark all you want about Inf flanking, that boy does not give a F. No wonder greyzone is the solution for tankers, they can not adapt to actually having to care for their surroundings. Maybe playing WT might be a better solution in that case, sure you can not HE free kills, but at least you can have as much tunnel vision as possible.
It’s not being afraid of competition when the competition is exploiting an area that is almost impossible to defend against. Gray zone tanking is not 100% happening every game or every map but those maps where it can be exploited need to have so sort of mechanic to end it. If you are on a team with inexperienced players, it’s easy for one player on the other side to exploit this through Gray Zone tanking.
This is a (war) themed (team) (PVP) game
War means he should be cruel and diverse
Even though this game may be more casual than other games of the same type,
But it doesn’t change the fact that this is (Team PVP)
If you were the only one doing all the work
And those friendly forces will only choose to be slaughtered voluntarily or hide in the house like cockroaches
Then you should protest against the incompetence of your teammates instead of complaining about the mechanics.
I think the explosive pack needs Tier 2 TT unlocked first, same as AP mines, IIRC.
The official has also explained 3+1 before (about 2 to 3 years ago)
If you have enough patience to rummage around, you can look for it
Of course you can get the right to use it
Just can’t hold them at the same time
Will this have any impact on your skills or performance?
I didn’t have a grid or premium account in Pacific before the merger.
Even so, I can rely on 3+1 to steadily get the top spot and complete multiple support tasks (the Japanese army played more than 350 games. The US military forgot that it was probably before SBD?)
So I don’t think there is any problem
- was not replying to you
- what is impossible to defend against? you can easily kill any tank with another tank with few exceptions(e.g. starter tanks vs anything BR2/BR3 or most tanks against KT). plane kills every tank with weakest bombs and as infantry you have AT rifles, AT rockets and engineer that can build AT guns. only thing needed are stronger AT rockets for some nations and stronger AT guns that can pen BR5 tanks and possibly second f2p vehicle slot.
if you fail to counter enemy despite having options to, then it is your fault and not enemies.
i was talking about explosive pack, but it needs finished researching t1. TNT is available at start and is inferior to explosive pack.
Oh yeah, sorry, mixed up the two. I meant explosive pack.
-fixed.
Maybe try Deepl. It is a bit better than Google.
Trying to sinplify it:
- Marking is not really teamwork and are often inaccurate except for tanks.
- The second sentence was too vague and I do not know what you were trying to say.
Doesnt has TNT more pen?
yes it will. player with both tank and plane has advantage over player with only one of those
yes, but you need to know exactly where to place it to actually kill tank. explosive pack will kill on most places on the tank.
justbone example: German Airfield and your team dont have any single air support and you are being camped