the best solution would be to change map playable size and spawning, with vigorous testing; but that’s not really possible the other solution would be to give a countdown for the tanks to get out of the geryzone and if they don’t, the tank would get destroyed.
also this playstyle has no skill, if you do it, you really should reconsider your life choices and place in this world; i tried it and it literally takes no skill, you don’t learn anything playing this playstyle, it just shows you are bad
Crybaby speech and moral high ground as always
You combine these two points very well
Are you interested in giving voice to extreme feminist groups?
Long-distance strike itself is a tactic often used by tanks in reality.
Not to mention that there is no cooperation between infantry and tanks in this game.
Not many people in the game want to go to a war zone and face a lot of anti-tank weapons.
Gray zone tanks are still unable to resist the threats of anti-tank weapons and vehicles (provided that some players have brains and know what they are doing)
Just give a few examples
I once used a stove tube to snipe a Sherman 200 meters away or used an M9 on the beach to snipe an N3 on a mountain wall 150 meters away.
Or use anti-tank fortifications across a lake to destroy the KV1 on the other side, or use 500-pound aerial bombs to blow up the enemy to the point where they dare not send out the King Tiger.
Really difficult to deal with?
Or is the crybaby too incompetent?
Another schizo post.
Grey zones don’t protect tanks, they protect spawns.
Without grey zones tanks would just drive to the nearest hill and keep spamming HE on the objective like in Heroes and Generals.
So you can’t deal with zero skill losers.
Mhhm, seems like one guy with skill issues is just triggered that other guy with skill issues has a slight advantage over him.
Nice, basically skill issue warfare
So you chose the arguably most casual fps game there is to boast about your skills ?
^
Sorry, but this game is not a game for pinnacle of skill, it is more like a 3-in-a-row. Or possible comparable to solitare.
The entire foundation of this game is built upon various units that players can exploit the strengths of, i doubt there will ever be any “balance” between the units. (I don’t know of any vehicle-shooter that has a resemblance of balance)
You should just accept that some of the players will find “cheesy” exploits to these mechanics and abuse the max out of them.
You just have to find ways around it (one of them being to quit playing)
The only true way to solve gray zone camping is my pipe dream of a giant battle. Giant map, multiple objectives, open space, tanks have to move it to support whatever particular objective. Combat would be more fluid and dynamic.
A tank wouldn’t just sit in spawn because (both teams) would only have one single spawn in the back and you have a whole battlefield to fight over
there are 2 problems with gray zone
solutions:
line of sight needs to be fixed by redesigning maps/spawns fixing second problem.
firepower issue and/or wrong loadout issue can be fixed in numerous ways, like adding better engineer AT cannons (japan and us have shit cannons for BR3-5 and even germany/soviets are not adequate for BR5), better AT handheld weapons (e.g. m20/panzerfaust for US/japan) and/or second vehicle slot for f2p players.
ironic, you are giving a crybaby rant about how it takes skill and is historically accurate
if you want accuracy join the military bozo
this game is meant to be fun not filled with losers like you, it takes no skill and its annoying, becuase a counterattack is a pain in the a$$ with the map layouts that’s why people do it, I’m a tank ace ffs, cant do shit when a guy is too scared for real combat
also blud really wrote all that and felt like he accomplished something
and i never heard of a tactic involving a tank going into a mysterious zone were people die is they stay too long there and i never heard of tanks going there, becuase they know unless someone with actual skill is in the game they’ll be untouched, actual tank strategies don’t involve abusing game mechanics ffs, i use tank strategies in this game and guess what i don’t need to abuse game mechanics
don’t forget that people don’t actually use tank strategies,
becuase if they did its weird they do it in specific maps where they can abuse these mechanics, weird considering every one who supposedly does this has been in the military in a tank crew debriefed on strategies and such, and these experienced young men don’t use any of them, they don’t use any tactic or strategy, especially in maps that allow it
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
Ik I’m crazy
2 things,
i can deal with them its just annoying, and id like to see you react after a hacker joins becuase he hacking is zero skill losers thing, you wont say the same thing
ok and, people ruining fun isn’t cool, like what do you want me to do join them, start hacking becuase its a casual game and no one is going to mad, and that last part you should do
ik, better to fix it, than leave it to stay, because its just annoying when it happens, well after all i think DF wants this game to be fun
i love you, that idea is just so good, i want it NOW!!!
You Cooked…
Guys don’t get it twisted, if I wanted to play a game with people exploiting and making the game not fun and annoying, Id play cod modern warfare 3
atleast those guys wont explain to me why exploiting is actually good and historically accurate
From skill to hack in one reply, not bad.
Cant really decide trolling or just genuine enlisted player, really hard to tell the differency.
politics somehow, and dodging the response well done
and you need to learn how to play grey zone camper
really hard to tell if you have critical thinking honestly
also but but its a casual game there should be no problem after all