Forum conspiracy theory

if you play war thunder enough you’ll start to hate them too :rofl:

I’m sorry, you know too much.

Say goodbye.

3 Likes

Have the mythical God Panther that has a transmission that doesn’t shatter every time you hit a rock. :rofl:

Meh. I kinda hate some Tommy tanks and the EBR more there…
but well this would explain his WT stats…

a03

3 Likes

Any amount of time spent playing Axis Normandy isn’t good for anyone’s mental health.

NO NO!! You don’t understand, stupid wehraboo!!! Axis 2OP!! We must get Abrams and ughh A-10s and uhh… tactical nukes!! That’s only way to balance everything! Aim at enemy tanks’ weakspots that are 10 times larger than ours? use tactics? not abuse greyzones? THAT’S UNFAIR! We must be able to win the match just by spawning in! MORE ARMOUR FOR JUMBOS!

3 Likes

honestly he might be doing it as loud he is doing it to pick up the slack from the general allied playerbase since, at least here on the english part, they usually don’t throw a shitfit

I’d rather have 10 silent allied mains that will intervine when it’s necesarry, than one loud boy that shouts when nothing special is happening.

Kind of like in the fairy tale about a boy who screamed “wolf”.

1 Like

it’s good entertainment, but that is what happens since i visit the forums pretty much hourly for the past year and my brains have almost definitely rotted out by axis mains constantly asking for nerfs. something else to promote powercreep and 2 times they declared a weapon of theirs was useless because it received a small nerf

1 Like

I don’t like that it’s most likely a mentally unstable person who got the most important thing - attention.
I would be very happy if it was a huge prank, but I don’t think so.
I think you should ignore him more, because any constructive dialogues lose meaning when he comes in. I don’t know who thinks it’s funny.

You are biased because you completely fail to mention how when the AVT was stripped of an undeserved magazine that violated the rules of the game with “the extra magazine was removed and the ammo was brought to the level of other rifles”
The Russian level bombshell exploded where even a Russian-speaking moderator cried about 1 extra magazine and cited historical sources that “there were actually 8 of them”

to me, it’s funny when he throws his tantrums of “AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA the allies suffer, Germany they give him tiger, fg-42, stg-44, that’s not balanced, THE ALLIES suffer”
to then make a 500-word argument that no one would read.

1 Like

I don’t know, people like him make the forum stop making sense. Sensible suggestions are lost and considered “whining”.

4 Likes

or get this: I don’t go there since I don’t understand the language, I know it sounds crazy, but it’s true I don’t ever go to the Ruskie side of the forums so how would I know if a shitfit is going on there? but speaking of bias it’s funny how you mention that when you love to ignore the BF110g-2 in normandy and love calling the MP43 weak

I’ve played for the Allies and I definitely say: the P38 is much better even in the assault slot. Literally killing tanks in packs with my eyes closed.
This fact alone nullifies the Axis tank advantage, as the enemy has an ultimatum tool for destroying them at level 4.
The Bf-110 cannot do that. Yes, it is better on infantry if you hit a huge crowd, but each missile launch is expensive (there are only 2), so if you are wrong, but waste 50% rockets. M8s give less at most, but not less on average if you are aiming at small clusters of infantry

Objective: this is the weapon with the smallest DPS at a high level. At 50% less than the Thompson. Accuracy is better, but marginally, much worse than Fedorov (a competitor in another campaign).
Damage does not match caliber power.
It’s a good weapon, but not divine like the m1919, which has no downside and is an anomalous dominator even on those characteristics (it’s better than the German MGs in everything) where it should lose (accuracy and penalty for shooting on the move).
The Beretta m38 is also a good weapon, but no more.
Are those words not objective? In my opinion, as much as possible.
If the MP43 stays that way, I’m going to want all high level enemy weapons to be mediocre as well.
Is the m1919 nerf close or do we still let each other have unique weapons that one wants to play for?
I didn’t complain when they gave it to me. Didn’t complain about me-410 and kar with another grenade launcher (two junk levels 33-34)
But when my primary weapon loses 25% efficiency (10% damage and 15% rate of fire, and another 10% reload rate) and gets nothing in return, that’s crap.
These weapons are class limited, they have no reason to be shit. The sniper Mkb is still the old Mkb.
I don’t think anyone liked the 10% damage nullification of the PPSh and the 15% rate of fire (or apply it to any of their high-level weapons)

3 Likes

you didnt take in account that the sight of the Thompson Just cover your entire screen when on the move or shooting, imo this make It worthless.

I have 10 Thompson m1a1s in Tunisia. Played with them from level 15 to 26, it almost doesn’t bother me.
My friend opened it yesterday and said “lol, why were they complaining at all”.
And I will say this, I’m all for improving this scope, it really could have been better. But fuck me for it now that the bastards on the other side are happy that my weapon has lost 25% of its effectiveness.
I’m kind of all for good for everyone since I have level 28 USSR and British and play with Thompsons, however some are just stupid and shortsighted. One day nerf will touch them and then no one will stand up for them.

1 Like

oh no it kills tanks…literally all it can do

you are wrong there, the BF110 can with both it’s 37mm and the rockets with the 37mm being more effective against areas of light armor like the hull of the m4a1.

and that is if you are only use the rockets however there is a trick to that it also comes with 30mms and said 37mm that can allow you to effectively take out the infantry on the ground and keep the skies clear either it be the jug or the lightening. as a bonus to the guns they can give you more staying power

if you excluded how many rounds it can get out as quickly since yeah the german MGs bet it out

confused to what you mean by this?

the only thing i would change about the 1919 is it’s reload since i find it a bit too fast so maybe it being 6.5 seconds could be more fair or they could make it so you can only reload if proned or mounted

it would be lower than that since it got a 15% so maybe ~16-20% lose in efficiency would be more accurate. though I should note that I find the nerf to be unnecessary but we should end this before it gets out of hand

want to make a bet? Record a video of how long it takes you to destroy 10 tanks on the range. I’ll do the same.
If anything, I will kill them three at a time, so you have no chance.
I played on the p38 and it just does not let the German tanks live. I have killed 7-8 pz4s, panthers and tigers per game. Absurd. Bf110 can not do that even at 20%.

With improvement it is 550-600, which is equal to the rate of fire of the “mega OP mp43”. Except that the recoil, accuracy, and damage are higher in the m1919. The mpg’s rate of fire is their disadvantage, because a lot of bullets go into the void.

why on earth would he have 1.5 times less of a moving penalty than mg34 if he’s heavier?
Why should it have 40% less dispersion if German machine guns weren’t actually the most inaccurate during the war?

15% of what? Precision. Okay. Not 25%, but 20%.
But that doesn’t help your game, because it’s important to kill a squad fast enough, and 8.8 damage with 550-600 rounds is no way to do that.
Sorry, but Kiraly does it better.

That many weapons may be considered good, but they are not divine.
I don’t understand why I need to grind level 32 for the sake of the Mp43, which has tangible disadvantages in the form of low DPS.
Want my opinion, in place of the m1 Thompson should be a Thompson with a 50 drum, but the MP43 MUST have 10.1 damage when upgraded and 0.5 base accuracy.
Is that a good deal? It seems so to me.
I don’t have the joy of shitting on other players for having a crooked scope, but I won’t help them if they shit on me
Let’s just be human. I want the Axis to have strong tanks and the Allies to have air power. But I don’t want a level 4 plane to be able to spoon and kill a tiger 15 seconds later while its pilot is a nub.
It should require skill and take more time.
Likewise with weapons. I want everyone to have really cool weapons. But if my opponents are set up so that everyone lives badly

1 Like