dont need to argue with you, it useless.
I would like to say that the next tank in Normandy will probably be the last one (when you consider 40 levels).
There is no point in an endless arms race, but right now the biggest BR tanks, according to WT, are the 5.3 - jumbo and the 5.7 - Panther A.
I think this is the upper limit above which tanks become monsters. The last tank could also remain in the range of 5.3-5.7
Tiger H - 5.3, Tiger E - 5.7
USA has M4A3 (76) W - 5.7, M4A2 (76) W - 5.3
It seems to me that if new tanks are coming, it would be strange to make them worse than the ones already available, but don’t go into BR 6.0+
It is a logical measure to give the U.S. a tank with a good gun and stop there. Otherwise we will go into T34 vs Tiger 2 H
That’s right … you’ve hit the nail on the head. When they expand levels they must be able to be balanced and a tiger asks for an opponent like that … and whoever is afraid of monsters is much better to defeat and kill something than others flee … a tank should not be like a cake that they all run towards him and fight over whoever saw him first to kill him … he must be a monster … there are them in all games and they work perfect
I was rather talking about the fact that we already have tanks 5.3 and 5.7. If we don’t add tanks with BR above, there will be no Powercreep concept. Tiger 2 is not needed in Normandy, it will really start an arms race and fight with super pershing, however tiger H or E is within the current power of tanks, exactly like M4A3 (76) W and M4A2 (76) W
So Axis players should feel ashamed lol?
not if you count that all (apart m8/10) have AP shells that dont do shit against tiger or really anything, so if they follow this ideology that all sherman should have AP the next us tank will probably be another TD.
And for the Germans one too. I remember that the devs once showed a Jagdpanzer for Normandy.
Unless they U-turned us again.
Even the AP shell of the M4A3 (76) W will penetrate both the panther and the tiger. Plus it could have APCBC. In any case, the developers will decide, I just expressed my opinion that the line will not be crossed
100 percent agree maybe a firefly in normandy and a KV1 in russia would be good opponents and good monsters … heheheh a bit of excitement and a challenge … I also think that charging a monster should have a special prize … hehehehe
Exact
Ofc all we need is a fucking Tiger with it’s 80mm side armor. Sherman with it’s shitty AP can’t even pen it’s side. Also 88mm HE sounds fun against infantry. They should never introduce these fucking late war tanks, this game isn’t about tanks. Infantry support stuff like M8 Scott would be more then enough.
There is a firefly in Normandy but it must be bought with real money
122mm IS-2 in Berlin?
I personally want the tiger it is an iconic tank and they will ensure allies can take it out with something… don’t say no to iconic tanks just because of balance.
The same thing with t34 1942 in moscow, they should add these tanks in regardless and asymmetrical balance is all that is needed.
I think this game is different precisely because it is not only infantry but there are tanks that work perfectly … hehehehe and planes that fly regularly … looking for something different
si un is2 seria tambien magnifico pero con un rival a su medida hablamos de balance … no?
I’m sorry I was wrong and I used my language, here I will translate it for you
If an is2 would also be magnificent but with a rival to suit you, we are talking about balance … no?
Is-2 will likely come with ktp in Berlin
I mean, the man was afraid of land mines from 88mm cannon, although we already have 85mm t-34 and will have Is-2 122mm
I see the Tiger being in Tunisia, it made a very iconic appearance here. I don’t really want to see it in Moscow, it would be too much, even the KV couldn’t do much…