I want my restitution. You all sat here, watched the video of the FNAB 43 shooting at 800 rpm (and I suggested that the rpm should be lower due to the smaller powder charge in 9mm than), and told me “ROF buff would make it go up a BR” when a Soviet smg is added with almost the same stats I suggested. Some of you said you liked that the gun shot slowly, even though you already have two guns that shoot comparably as slow as the M3 (MP 34(o) and MP 3008).
Now I make my suggestion to you (Darkflow): fix the FNAB 43 to its actual cyclic rate and leave the Uragan smg to the Soviets. You can slightly increase the recoil of the FNAB, but it should not exceed the Uragan. The dispersion is pretty bad already, so that should be left alone.
Spoiler
Even though this suggestion is about correcting the FNAB 43, due to this affecting the Soviets, I believe I should include a suggestion about their tech tree.
Since the Soviets only have one BR III smg (one of the best), I believe that the Thompson M1928 A1 should be added to their tech tree. We know that the previous Thompson, the Soviets, is currently BR IV, and would make no sense in adding it because Darkflow (you) hates their playerbase. This is the best option since it is already in-game.
It sounds interesting, we only know about a hurricane from photos and make it with strong stats, and the FNAB does not take the rate of fire, even with a video.
My beutifull friend there was an article written in russian about the gun , and funny thing is this article claims that weapon only fires around 500 to 600 RPM not 750 maybe @MajorMcDonalds or @Euthymia07 can tell devs to change its fire rate
The highlighted part ,says that it fired 500-600 RPM its in the article I linked
You can also check the Belarusian museum collection via link below it has some unique partisan weapons made during ww2 https://www.warmuseum.by/muzeynye-kollektsii/oruzhie-samodelnoe/
TBH the article says that these are just estimation not concrete information, but still this doesent give devs the right to just put this thing in BR II with those stats
could be anything as long as it is Soviet and not yet another weapon coming from another faction. things like shrekwithoutashield for allies and Japan is already cringe enough as is… and I remember devs removed the Tommy with grip and ppsh41 (captured) from them and axis respectively, just for that reason.
You know how many less posts we would have if Dark Force had just done some basic research and created “EVERY WEAPON” in the game to the most commonly used model of ww2. Had they done this the first time, there would be no reason for us to keep posting about buffing or de buffing weapons (experimental weapons aside).
Dark Force, you brought this upon yourself. Hire someone to research all the weapons in your game, and let him reprogram them to “CORRECT” specs and be done with it. Once they are all accurate, there shouldn’t be anymore cries for buffing…But there still will be. At that point, people need to face the fact that not all weapons were good ones.
I only researched three smg’s in the game. The PPS-42, PPS-43 and the FNAB 43. The PPS-42 from what I can tell is fairly accurate, while the PPS-43 and FNAB 43 are not. DF chose to over buff the PPS, and under buff the FNAB. The Uragan from what I can tell is most likely also over buffed as well. So, IMOP, if these three guns were changed to their most likely Rate of fires, we would most likely have four SMG’s that are all roughly the same specs. Do I expect DF to do this? No, but IMOP it would be the right thing.
At that point, people need to face the fact that not all weapons were good ones.