All MkB42s should have been moved to BR 4 tbf. They are StG44s with lower rpm and being in BR5 makes them obsolete by default.
6 Likes
I see the Mosin M44L, a late war prototype, is in BR 1. Does that mean it would be in Moscow
And the VG 1-5 is BR 3. Does that mean it would be in say Tunisia and Normandy
And the OG-43 is BR 4, so I’m assuming that means Italian paratroopers in Normandy and Berlin
I don’t see why BR can’t reflect historical accuracy. Early war stuff, BR 1-2. Late war stuff, BR 4-5. BR 3 can be stuff that can appear in both early and late war
2 Likes
p47 I think there should be level 5 BR, but why can the M2 carbine have level 5 BR? The power of this gun cannot be compared with the German assault rifle.
your right because it’s an all trooper weapon so it should be there
1 Like
I know im not the only one who is asking and it’s getting old but…
WHEN?
The M10 is equal to slightly worse than the 4J and should be rank 3, like i said in my suggestion post, the light armor, open top and low turret speed more than make up for its potent gun.
6 Likes
A gun that is equivalent to what the Germans got in Tier III by default, mind you
1 Like
I like your idea about adding M1 Bazooka Lend Lease
1 Like
Tbh I thought they would at best put that thing as premium squad for extra insult.
But yeah, that thing would be better than Super Pershing.
True
1 Like
Silly Germans, they could have won the war if instead of wasting time and resources on wunderwaffen they’d invested in researching Grey Zone technology.
7 Likes
Could you move the SU76 down from 3 to 2 as to be honest it being a glass cannon is kinda nullified by it having to fight tiger 2 H etc (which it cannot even pen at all)
But why have battle ratings at all then, like if it’s not about fair chances, why add such limitations at all?
2 Likes
And what if you are NOT in a urban map? What if the KV 1 is camping the pit at the monatsry?
You cant get close to it and you need something with range to take it out?
Just because it wasnt that bad in SG does not mean it wont be bad somewhere else.
If maps for normandy where just terrible for tank the allies wouldnt care enought to call the tiger op.
why would you move 1942 equipment to 1944-45, thats where the StG-44 resides.
1 Like
I fear a 4-stack of seasoned players with grenade launchers, AP mines, arty, bombing and mortars will still make BR1 newbies’ life hell.
Am I right that current ratings do not prevent it at all? E.g. rifle grenade launchers are on tier 2, AP mines do not count etc?
But judging by the fact that the devs were removing all/most of the land lease premiums and SG content I doubt they want to add more to replace those they removed.
You haven’t understood anything. I’m talking about moving the MkB42, not the StG44, into BR4. Wtf are you telling me dude.
M1 Bazooka is good for T5 since they recieved them very late, but they wont be better than the Pzf-100.
moving them into Rank4 literally puts you to normandy and berlin, and still thats not a good idea, i think you did not read properly.
1 Like
That might be the case but I had the impression that the devs want the USSR to be fighting only with USSR stuff (and the odd panzerfaust) and not not with land leased stuff.
They pulled every bit of land lease content off the shelfs even if it means no more premium sales money for them.
I might be wrong but I would say that them adding land lease back is unlikely.