The point of this thread was favourtism. If US has nicer things then they are more favoured than the Soviets with the logic OP provided.
Anyways, Germans have 3 para squads and will have atleast 4 soon (leak). Russians have 0, and will have atleast 1 (leak), max 2 (speculation).
Germans still have better stuff according to my playstyles so all my points still stand.
I definitely don’t consider Russia to be favoured by the developers. Not saying that is bad. Each nation is good at their own things and that is the way things should be! I hate games that 1:1 each and every single thing.
1 Like
think that they will be included in regular tech tree after merge. otherwise it would be really stupid for them to be event only that only certain players have and nobody else can have them afterwards (for free).
1 Like
The Germans have more things, yet the difference at stake is absurd.
We are talking about Germany being superior to the Soviets in absolutely everything and that it was only because of foreign help and Germany’s own mistakes that the Soviets were able to “win.”
So it doesn’t make sense that the Soviets are so superior in practice.
That’s historically speaking, but in the game, at least visually, the Germans have better weapons and technology, but at game time a Russian anti-tank rifle from the second delivery destroys a German tank from the last delivery.
Meanwhile, a German anti-tank from the latest delivery has a hard time destroying a Soviet tank from the first delivery.
I still can’t understand how they die defending this game, they tell me without even understanding or asking me to explain.
This game has a lot of nonsense and shortcomings, but when you complain about them they even go so far as to insult you ._.
Anyway, I don’t expect nor am I interested in the players understanding me, my goal was to reach the developers who of course are not interested in the game, nor the forum, much less the complaints…
After all, I already saw how sensitive the forum mods are and how useless they are in their “technical service”
I know that the last one is not relevant, but I plan to close this here since I saw that the use of the forum does not make sense and its existence is only to say “we have one”
I estimate this game will die soon and its killer will be the fusion, which people asked for something other than a war thunder and a whar tunder to give us, there you have the little that the developers care about the collective opinion.
For my part, I’m just waiting for the “fusion” to see the “terminal lucidity” of this game.
I think the fusion/merge will mostly do it good.
I agree Enlisted is not perfect but I personally like the imbalances. I don’t play soviets (much) because from where I stand they are inferior. My play styles though based on my weapon/history interests.
The fact that you think they are OP and I think they are not based on both our playstyles (I don’t even touch AT rifles for example) says to me they’ve done an excellent job with the imbalance of war.
Hope your message reaches the devs and hope you can find joy in this unique game once more at some point. I’m happy with major changes to the game so hope it reaches a point where both you and I can be happy with it.
Actually I prefer be Berlin 24/7 cuz other campaign can go straight to hell, specially Moscow
USSR´s biggest problem post merge is its lack of unique content.
Both Germany and USA has weapons, tanks and aircraft from not just their own pool but also of allied and occupied countries while USSR is mostly just Soviets tech boosted with many inter-war and prototype weapons.
But seeing the back-lash from AS-44 addition (rightfully), adding new Soviet weapons is near impossible as almost all weapons used by the Red Army in realistic quantities has already been added.
I proposed adding lend-leased weapons that were actually used by the Red Army, this was back in late August and I havent heard anything about this since.
If we want USSR to have a “fair” chance and be an as interesting faction as Western Allies or Axis, we need to demand lend-leased weapons.
Enlisted. Future Tech tree 2 - Google Drive
I find the Soviet mid tier SMG/AR way too empty. almost every BA rifle is mosin-trash and 3 out of 5 MGs are on high BR.
Seriously horrible spread.
2 Likes
Better stuff like what exactly? Cuz Soviet SMG, Semiautomatic, BR and “AR” beats german ones by far, the only good thing the german has is good bolties compared to them
Tanks, only the big cats mattered cuz before them they got streamrolled
Planes, maybe some fighters and some bombers
Now US side:
Very great shotguns, very dogshite SMG except the Lanchester
No AR but M2 Carbine exist which is the best thing of any US rifleman/any class but Assaulter can get, aside from the T20 of course
Tanks are decent except Jumbo, that thing is no brainer , missing heavy tanks against Tiger II for sure
Planes are great, specially the one with rockets, ironically the soviet has better P40 than the US one
Japan, at this point is a meme faction, post merge will kill this faction in any BR but the early one, Devs added this faction without considering the balance at all
1 Like
Why does he keep coming here? 
1 Like
No I have not completed both sides because I’ve already had to make a second account and I’m an F2P player so I don’t have the free time to level up both sides.
More lend lease stuff would be nice. Sidegrades could be nice too. I know it’s devmans brain disease to keep power creeping…but there really isnt some overwhelming need to do so. The damn game is fun as it is…at least when you get decent match once and again…