I really don’t like what’s happening, we got probably the best news we had ever gotten for enlisted and people on forums are just crying about historical accuracy. I know a large group of players who are playing this game and only people on forums are toxic about the news. I see the same people that proposed and defended existing non-historicaly accurate equipment to be added for balance are now also complaining about historical accuracy.
So explain this to me, how is having a Tiger in Moscow less accurate than having 3 squads with federov avtomat. Honestly I don’t see the diference
Enlisted stopped focussing on being historically accurate long time ago, it’s your problem if you installed this game thinking it’s f2p Hell let loose you should just quit and play another game at this point because darkflow already decided what they’re gonna do
And for those of you saying new progression will ‘‘kill the game’’,
how is it going to kill the game
by making matches more balanced?
by fixing the playerbase splitting?
by removing weapon imbalance?
The only thing this update will bring is a lot more players, players used to AAA fps games who will enjoy this progression and if some ww2 fanatics leave it’s not going to change anything.
The game is not dying, far from it
It’s just not the game for you go play hell let loose and post scriptum if you want strict historical accuracy
If you got better ideas, let’s hear them instead of 24/7 crying about the game
Just because there is a little historical inaccuratecy doesn’t mean we should have even more. And in fact if they implement the rework properly all current inaccuracies can be fixed.
now the game is not historically accurate (MKB42 moscow, PanzerF2 moscow, Jumbo, Fedorov), and to be honest, it’s impossible to make it historically accurate if you give the freedom to choose weapons to the players, first, you shouldn’t be given freedom to choose weapon, and second, you shouldn’t be giving freedom of power choose a specific vehicle if not, some already predefined
Personally, I can handle a little historical inaccuracy if it makes the game more enjoyable. Don’t get it mistaken, let’s not go CoD with it, but I’m not going to get my knickers in a wad over the Tiger being in Moscow or a few weapons from 1946 ending up in Berlin or something like that.
Personally, I am excited to see the progression tree and am eager to find out how the new matchmaker is going to work.
Cod Vanguard was horrible because of historical inaccuracy, and the game was a flopped. do you want enlisted to be the same?
Does Tigers and IS-2 in Battle of Moscow sounds normal to you?
This isn’t Warthunder, so if we want to play Bolt action matches we have to spend 10 minutes unequipping everyone and swapping gears, and in Warthunder you just need to Pick a Tank thats it
What about ppl who spend gold on Customizing squads, and soldiers, we get no compensation?
And what about Berlin level 6 Sovierts unlocking the Panzerfaust? This mean everyone runs around in Moscow with Panzerfausts, that sounds okay to you right?
And what about all the ppl who grinded multiple campaigns, and did it from level 1 from scratch, now we get dumped and treated badly. most premium vehicles will also become useless when this update hits live.
One thing I’ve noticed is the M1 Garand sight is wrong. The rear sight is supposed to be a tiny pinhole. A lot of games like Call of Duty, Battlefield and Enlisted made it to be a big thin ring so that the player can see better.
M1 Garand sight irl
Similar to this I personally don’t mind the game being “historically accurate” with a few wiggle rooms.
Of course not. Again, I don’t mind something being out of place here and there to make the game a bit more enjoyable. A red line has to be drawn and abided by.
That whole thing so far proposed makes campaigns basically pointless and heck the proposed UI looks ugly as hell.
Most people just wanted a better/ faster grind and a tech tree for campaigns, not an ENTIRE tech tree for one nation across so many different periods.
But for now I would just shut up and lets wait for more intel but I guess somehow we need to give the mods reasons to exist.
Who?
I guess the Mkb would have been a better example. Also why do we need Tigers in Moscow if there are already two campaigns with it? It just sounds lazy… as 90% of the past decisions of the devs.
Dude how long do you wanna come up with this strawman? Its starting to smell.
Pfff Yeah DF constantly u-turns around so I wouldn’t really rely on their decision-making.
What now?
And how would that make MGs shoot straight again or not make the MP38 ridiculous over accurate?
And Japan well…
Have been but you never actually bothered to look at them so I dont know why someone should bother now.
Lol, you can’t say Japan will meet those vehicle when we didn’t have detail about the match making yet. Moreover, those vehicle’s br will surely be higher than all Japanese vehicle, so most probably they will not meet it.
Hm Jumbo or Ho Ni? How fast would people pick the Jumbo? Can they even really pen a Jumbo? Granted, not same BR as in WT, probably far less in Enlised because they are TDs.
Apparently they would rather the game die a slow, painful death because “muh historical accuracy”
Because people running around with LMGs mowing down enemies is historically accurate
