Who CARES? Only a vocal minority of the playerbase such as you seem to care about it.
1 Like
This is the most universally flawed argument ever.
Feel free to imagine it every time you see any problem in the game.
Answer: it’s literally a game about WW2 so introducing new content that is inheritly anti WW2 instead of other very much WW2 options I described above is stupid.
Also, where is the source on AS and RPD in combat?
1 Like
So Rzhev is now “inheritly anti WW2”, I see.
1 Like
I don’t believe your English level is not sufficient to read this
This is the most hilarious combination of words I’ve ever seen LMFAO. What does “anti-WW2” even supposed to mean? Who are you to decide if something is “anti-WW2” or not?
As I’ve said multiple times, this game’s main focus is not HA anymore, whether you like it or not. Yes it’s still a game “about” WW2, but that doesn’t mean we have to be 200% strictly HA about it.
I really can’t be bothered to find the exact proper source where I read that(such things take an exorbitant amount of time you know), now. But at the end of the day it doesn’t matter, as they are actual protypes that existed during WW2(you’re not going to deny that, are you?) and are not some fake imaginery BS the devs invented for the game. That’s enough reason to justify their existence in-game. It’s not like they’re suddenly going to remove such prototypes from the game at this point anyway. Whether they were “used” or not doesn’t matter AT ALL. I may be repeating this too many times, but Enlisted is NOT a WW2 simulator and NEVER will be. If you can’t accept that reality, nobody’s stopping you from quitting and not bothering about this game anytime you wish.
1 Like
What makes Enlisted such a good game = quality + F2P + progression system
Not historical accuracy 
4 Likes
It’s new content, for everyone and not just low BR or high BR. That’s a good thing(unless the new maps are badly designed). HA doesn’t matter here.
Sure I’d rather have something like Manchuria or Iwo Jima/Okinawa instead. But it’s not like having new maps is gonna make the game worse, unless they have issues related to actual gameplay such as bad design or bad optimization or bugs.
Cause “historic” was an important element of the past propaganda, and it is still mentioned multiple times on the official website despite being changed multiple times.
Well I think most people would know better than to believe such advertising statements to be 100% true to the word.
Idk.
Looking only in a gameplay optic, late br things, like Is2 1944 and KTH, in BIG OPEN MAPS, are really attractive things to me.
I don’t really like using both tanks, even less tank destroyers, in Berlin.
But I know I’ll love it in open maps.
(I mean I enjoy my Is2 1944 the most in… train escort!!!)
I just love how this video has no single HLL frame. Makes you think if he actually played it.
5 Likes
HLL is seriously fun. Great, even.
But it’s silly that ppl compare them (with Enlisted) on the same criterias when both games are so fundamentally different…
It’s like… SOME guy cannot accept that BOTH games can be good at what they’re intended.
5 Likes
I agree. I hope one day hll will introduce single player with bots so bad players like me can feel more useful
He calls AI a unique selling point. Dude just loves to rack up his kill count without any resistance.
Oh and F2P because paying for games is gay and it “didn’t reach its full potential yet”-
Low quality game 
1 Like
Luckily Enlisted is not known for bullets that do not register, ghost shells or poor server performance and shitty accuracy of guns.
2 Likes
Why can’t new content be within WW2?
Why not “Field” map or “Belarus”?
Rzhev ended in 1943, none of your fluffy Fortnite fantasies will make Tiger 2 “ok” there.
It is not a problem that it is a low-quality game, with empty maps and retarded mechanics.
What makes is such dogshit is acceptance of hackers and advertising it as a “best WW II game”.
(video shows “night map”)
On the plus side, it could just be that there aren’t that many currently playable maps, and there’s pretty much only one option per BR if it’s too restrictive. Maybe in the future there will be a more realistic distribution mechanism when there are more maps.
1 Like
Sounds like an average comment from someone who don’t like a simulator-like war game.
If you are mean to express your love for Enlisted by this way, then I would like to express my gratitude to you on behalf of the “Enlisted Promotion Team”
All I can say is that maybe we don’t know which is the better WWII game, but we will know in the future which one is more popular among its players based on steam reviews.
1 Like