I want to, I remember personally seeing IS-3 there.
Hey, just an advice in logic and false equivalency, something from the past is perfectly capable to be in the present, something from the future however usually don’t appear on the past, like the late game unlocks for the axis in Moscow.
But when it benefits the axis y’all forget to whine about it
You think i was seriously demanding a KT for moscow? If I wanted to demand something I would have chosen something less outlandish…
But the point still stands that no proof should mean not there unless you really need it for othere reasons.
nope. i’m pointing out lame excuses to get wunderwaffe out of time line, while whining at any allied weapon that is better than german, while its mass produced and in proper timeline.
T-50 is in Moscow to save your whine instead of adding historically correct 34-57 and KV. And as i was told - T-50 appeared before T-34 was added - so it proves my words.
Fedorov is about mirroring MKBs, demand to get rid of them together with Fedorov.
I do not need any of those, including AS-44 and would be fine with correct weaponry. Including total german domination in armour in mid-war, if it’s to be implemented.
Well, once again, if PPSh is worse than MP40 - why whine for STG, and if T-34 is worse than existent III - IV variants, why whine for a tank from the future.
Can be replaced with either 34-57 or KV, that fit Moscow theatre, unlike T-50. Germans can have replacements to Moscow instead of F2 and STG (and many others) too, LOL.
It makes sense to put this retardation in Moscow instead of T-34 or KV so germans would not whine like they would if 34/KV were added directly, without unnecessary T-50. But they still whine, lol.
Yea, and soviets - 85mm, as they were used in defense of Moscow. Also could add rockets to MiG-3 as they used them in Moscow and so on and so on.
Didnt the PPsh had problems accepting new mags (atleased for the drums) and the T34 with everything else?
T34 was just carried by its armor and its gun but wasnt that great otherewise.
Just imagine if they added supply problems and manufacturing defects for a more authentic experience.
i dont think they could replace stuff until the merge drops but idk about taking away existing stuff.
It stoped making sense as soon as the T34 was added anyways.
And the pairing with panzer 3 j was just a joke. But at the times still wasnt as bad as T34 and J1 as it was just 1 slot of ubertank instead of 2.
Still dont recall ever asking for it, could have settled just fine with kp31.
Dont think I asked that either, could do just fine with engi buildable 88.
But ofc, USSR is known for quality tanks so that 88 probably is too much.
Would require some serious mentalgymnastics to make the early war soviet tanks endure 88 hits.
Fine ? Answer is 88
For all I care you little cupcakes can have a famous t-14 armata for all I care as long as germans get something to fight against it.
Which has been the issue all the way untill F2.
Sure
Well theres already rockets, which had IRL about 2% accuracy but someone apparently forgot that memo.
So fine, just throw some fancy ass nuclear rockets to germans too.
Lol. In real life they were used by real pilots, who weren’t playing games and did not have a chance to spam them with 1 minute reloads. I love how you measure that.
Yea, typical.
Nothing more to discuss. You do whine.
Actually it has too much since 7.62 tokarev is over penetarting round so it does little as possible dmg what comes to terminal ballistics IRL.
MMM nope, plenty of them were in hands of germans during battle of moscow.
Definitely by far more than fedorovs or t-50’s.
Ah, so when its about soviet equipment the “IRL” or “Historical” accuracy doesnt apply ?
Well yes, spent enough time at these forums to know that references to ussr or communist usually results in some really twisted as fk mental gymnastic arguments.
Should have known you aint any different.
I already said you are sort of slow.
Fedorov could be used anywhere in 1941 because it existed BEFORE 1941.
F2 could not be, because it appears only in mid 1942. Is it THAT hard?
One thing exists. Other is not even invented.
Your arguments about Fedorov are as lousy as modern - no video of a crime - no crime committed.
One of the best parts of the merge will be that the campaign timelines will disappear, and all these arguments about what month a weapon entered service will lose relevance.
Nobody really cares about historical accuracy, I can tell because the goal posts are always moving; it’s only a means to forward their argument against a side or weapon they don’t like in game.