Do not play the pacific campaign

DO NOT ENTER THE PACIFIC CAMPAIGN

the allied team, just like in Stalingrad, Moscow and Normandy, have all the better shit. If the war was actually this one-sided the war won’t wouldn’t have been notable for anything other than warcrimes and being a sequel to the first.

I play with friends, and I cannot get any of them to go into the campaign it’s so fucked if you play anything but the Allies. Like shit the tommy shreds through metal and tanks and has a high mag and general ammo cap than the type 100, they took out the MGs on the Ka-Chi, the GMC is better, able to actually pen armor with a higher rpm. Japanese rifles are so bad it’s a fucking gamble to tell where my shot is actually gonna hit outside of 20m.

Ya’ll fucked Warthunder, World of Tanks and made them into garbage nightmare grind fests where you’d be too in deep to change your faction once you realize they just get unreasonably bad at a tier, for no reason.

Again, fuck the Pacific Campaign, do not enter it, unless it’s to report your teammates and enemy players for being in it.

3 Likes

“Allies in Normandy have the better things”

:thinking:

Yeah, sure… moving on…

18 Likes

My brother in christ, if people find something more powerful/useful, in this case stronger faction. They’re going to use it, it’s normal

“Allies in Normandy have better things” made me laugh, good one

9 Likes

They went with late war gear but early war maps.

They should have went late war gear, late war maps. Where basically every map for US would be fckn D-day

5 Likes

well they do have air supremacy :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

At least it’s not as bad as Moscow and Tunisia axis 🤷

3 Likes

I dont play pacific cause i have seriously no fun on it … a trek simulator with AA spam bomber SPAM and useless tanks

4 Likes

I can’t speak for Tunisia only because its been quite some time since I played.
However Moscow was a lot of fun when I was helping my friend grind up to max. Not sweaty but not easy. The perfect matches where it could have gone either way.

Maybe that has changed since the introduction of the Fedorov or MkB.
I’ve been living in the Pacific since it launched.

1 Like

laughs in FG42, BF110g-2, JU-188, panther, tiger 1, panzerfaust, panzerschrek, Mp43, ZK-383, MAB38, FG42II, panzer 3N, and G43

you get more armor in exchange for the lack of mgs (can’t shot through the pontoons)

that is literally skill issue since you can get better with that also type hei and type 99 sights are 10/10

Now on to things that japan gets better: AT weapons with their tube being a bazooka but better, a 20mm ATR, bayonets on literally everything, better bombs for aircraft

that would be the wehraboos that ruined war thunder, don’t beleive me well look at the panzer 4H which did fine at 4.3 but got moved down to 3.7, same with tiger 1, panther d, leopard 1, a lower br m48 that is objectively better than the american m48 and chinese ones (better engine and smoke grenades that the other 2 don’t get)

TL;DR OP has skill issue

5 Likes

You forgot the StG-44

3 Likes

there really isn’t much different between the 2 guns :man_shrugging:

Just leave this game.

4 Likes

Wtf? What is wrong with Moscow axis, except, well, tanks (better planes though)? And Tunisia gear is pretty much the most balanced across all the campaigns. Gear balance in the Pacific is an absolute dogshit, Japs only having one viable main weapon (boltie with the grenade launcher) and flamethrowers.
Players distribution is another quiestion.
P.S. LOL’d at Normady allies having better stuff.

Lmao

  • thompson from lv 16 and the last one is drum for allaies, axis the same gun reskinned unlocked 3 time and the last one is decent
  • allies have better BA
  • Allies have better tank
  • allies have better MG
  • allies have better semi-auto
  • #axis have better cas

Balanced

3 Likes
  • Garbage, all of them, except for 21|28
  • Nobody plays with BA and nobody cares. Never compare unmaxed campaigns.
  • Better where? PZ IV have no issues with the Sherman whatsoever.
  • Maybe, dunno, i don’t use MGs, can’t comment.
  • Garand is god awful. Johnson has reload troubles, what’s wrong with the axis one?
  • Strange, i thought Beaufighter is a bit better than axis counterparts.

Oh, I’m not saying playing axis is impossible in Moscow (neither in Tunisia), only that the opposite factions have it easier, equipment wise.

But in the end, when all you need is a starter bolt action and having your feet in the cap zone, what trullies matter are smarts and how players decide to tackle the challenge.

In Moscow, playing allies being notoriously easier… Also means that most allies there have their guards down. So once they meet experienced opponents, superior weaponry or not… They get taken by surprise. Always interesting to see.

Like Pacific. Everyone says USA dominates here with superior firepower (I personally don’t think it’s such a huge difference) but if those players meet coordinated Japanese forces… woops, they don’t know what to do :thinking:

2 Likes

i’d like to point out that defending in the pacific is also pretty easy

1 Like

Always better than 3 time mp40

@Conscript_Joe is a heretic

Armor, allaies tank can take damage the axis tank instead no, and i talk about all tank, the crusader keep ohk all german tank

Bar with semi-auto dispersion vs mg34 wo the dispersion make a cone of bullet

1st one 6 bullet low damage
2sd one 10 bullet 5s reload
3rd one is fine

That the problem 30+ level for a decent semi-auto

With the actual nerf of flight model bereu is a flying snail

2 Likes

It is!

It’s almost easier than in Normandy! Maps are so open in the Pacific, that riflemen are the real mvps, even with starter bolties.

I love this.

It takes smarts to advance (get past mg, bolty and aa fire) and to defend as well, if the defense team does not know how to place proper defenses etc.

I like Pacific. Pretty hardcore.

Never seen that much rallies points in that many consecutive matches.

“Laugh at @NekOnOkO with Lee Enfield aka best bolt action in the whole game”

1 Like

Well, as far as Type 38 and Type 99 are concerned, they are pretty good weapons.
The worst is the Type 96LMG, which has a lot of recoil for its low power, and the sights are very hard to see (the scope is just for decoration).