Do not add Tiger tank to the Japanese

We should still be considering a faction system rework - through asymmetrical balance, there would be no need for every faction to have copy paste gear.

Japan specifically could have their active tanks per team reduced by one - and instead be able to bring 3 planes at once.

2 Likes

YĢ¶oĢ¶uĢ¶ gĢ¶eĢ¶tĢ¶ tĢ¶hĢ¶iĢ¶sĢ¶ aĢ¶mĢ¶aĢ¶zĢ¶iĢ¶nĢ¶gĢ¶ sĢ¶mĢ¶gĢ¶ iĢ¶tĢ¶sĢ¶ bĢ¶eĢ¶tĢ¶tĢ¶eĢ¶rĢ¶ aĢ¶tĢ¶ mĢ¶iĢ¶dĢ¶ rĢ¶aĢ¶nĢ¶gĢ¶eĢ¶ dĢ¶uĢ¶eĢ¶ tĢ¶oĢ¶ 0Ģ¶.2Ģ¶ mĢ¶oĢ¶rĢ¶eĢ¶ dĢ¶mĢ¶gĢ¶.
You get this memeretta 20mag, its much more tactical because you have less ammo so its easier to be conservative.

I get this roombroom with 71mag that works just fine at so called mid range as well.

Yeah aint working.

2 Likes

The current imbalance doesnā€™t mean balance is impossible to achieve

20 round mag is better because larger mag makes you spray n pray :upside_down_face:

5 Likes

So called ā€œass-ymmetricalā€ has been tested now for quite some time.
And apparently it works so well that M9 zooka got recently buffed.

Its just not working.

I dont think so - I still believe that ā€œthe balance differencesā€ between factions exist by accident and arenā€™t really planned by the devs.

Then they really should focus on something else.

Different faction perks/configurations would be cool

2 Likes

Literally nothing in your statement makes sense or correlates with reality.

image

  • Itā€™s a Tiger
  • Thereā€™s Japanese guys in it.

Itā€™s already more than sufficient reasons to add the thing, considering Enlisted criteriasā€¦ Most brV stuff for Soviets, Japan are already fantasy. T20 for usa as well, soā€¦

Itā€™s a Japanese Tiger or a Gundam. Take your pick.

6 Likes

Yeah, letā€™s just lazily copy paste stuff between factions because fantasy exists.

Itā€™s not like you already can play Tiger I in German Tech tree.

We could just remove faction concept. Since there would be no point in having factions anyway. Just let everyone to have everything. Because fantasy is already in the game anyway.

1 Like

Tell that to the devs.

Itā€™s they who started that way a whiiile backā€¦

1 Like

murrica has better cas, germut has better tank.
Ass-ymmetrical balance.

Apparently its just not that fun ā†’ buff zooka.

Takes little bit of mental gymnastics to come to conclusion Tiger 1 in japan TT equals entire GE TT.

1 Like

Personally Iā€™d really quite like to see it come to Japan along with the 6 STGs they bought in some sort of event.

1 Like

Probably isnā€™t gonna be identical to the German TT Stg, because if is an event gun (if is ever added) itā€™s should different, so something like this

ā€œstg 44 (early)ā€ with less roof and more recoil on line with the mp43, and probably with a different colour pattern

1 Like

Iā€™m all for it, so I guess that makes me crazy. The allies already have ā€œcopy, pasteā€ equipment that wasnā€™t theirs at the start of the war but itā€™s okay for them to have it. Why canā€™t the Japanese do the same thing? If the Japanese bought the tank or tanks, itā€™s theirs they belong to their Army. The only reason why it never saw combat for the Japanese was due to the war going bad for them and Germany. But that still doesnā€™t take away from the fact that the Japanese army had a Tiger in WW2. I donā€™t understand why the knee jerk reaction to if they put a Tiger in the Pacific then the next step is armored walkers with Lazer guns.

And the people saying that the maps wonā€™t support the Tiger. Well just because the current maps donā€™t support big tanks easily doesnā€™t mean they donā€™t have maps in mind that will. Personally, I think they should build out new maps and edit the ones that they have to remove some of the clutter and reimagine them. Because yes, the bulk of the conflicts were fought on islands, but not all islands looked like the ones we have, or had battles take place right on the beach or shoreline. Some major conflicts took place inland in jungles and cities centers. These are the conflicts that would change how the Pacific is played, and you wonā€™t get the boring old map that just changes locations but gives you the same experience when fighting.

Much easier, and what devs usually do in this situation:

  • they take the base existing weapon, and slap a bayonet on it.

Ta daaa, event weapon! :stuck_out_tongue:

3 Likes

First of all, hopefully we never see that.

Secondly, is there a source for that?


Because Japan never used a Tiger tank in battle?

Because no Tiger tank was ever part of the Japanese army?

1 Like

If you wanna go thereā€¦

Type 4/5 launchers
Chi-Nu
Chi-To
Ho-Ri
Tokyo Arsenal
Type Hei Auto/LMG

Excluding just Japan
T-34-100
T20/T20E1
Horn STG
Cƶnders
LAD
MG35/36
STG-45m
Krieghoff
AS-44 M4/M5

And thatā€™s just odd the top of my head
When there is an option to represent something that existed historically, or that can be used to fill a balancing gap(such as Japan lacking a good turretted heavy tank, Soviets desiring a faster firing tank for tiger hunting, Japan requiring a SFR, Ditto for the US) then that alone is reason enough to exist

The beauty of this game is it has the ability to depict these elements and parts of history that are obscure, overlooked, or never quite made it, while also simply allowing you to just not use these items if you so desire

This game isnā€™t entirely authentic and accurate with real life, nor should it really strive to strictly stay within what WAS there, having May 8, 1945 as a hard cut off point is enough of a limitation on the devs as is.

4 Likes

Japan paid 645k Reichmark for the tiger they technically owned the tiger and it acted as a Japanese attache in German army but I guess thatā€™s not enough