It would be nice to introduce classic team deathmatch and free-for-all as a game-playable mode in lone fighter. also a tank-only mode would be the top
1 Like
I mean you got WT SIM battles for this…
3 Likes
Tank vs Tank is a joke and we have WT here.
And maybe its just me but we dont need Deathmatch.
3 Likes
Feels like all of the Moscow city maps are already death matches
1 Like
Deathmatch doesn’t fit the vision of what Enlisted is supposed to be. Objectives matter, not kills.
4 Likes
well Enlisted have 0 realism so why not
2 Likes
I just told you.
Devs never planned to do that and the game is built for other things. Gamemode where all you have to do is kill people doesn’t work in the game where you have to complete objecites to win and kills don’t matter that much.
And “has 0 realism” is a very subjective statement. It has more of that than Batllefields and CODs. Realism doesn’t mean simulator.
game is not like this bro it is completely symetrical no asymetrical is present here
Invasion and Assault are assymetrical modes. And conquest is commonly hated as you can see by ammount of posts saying “Give us option to play only Invasion”.
Deathmatch would make even less sense.
1 Like
how is invasion asymetrical you have 10 vs 10 lol if it was 10 vs 20 with tanks on one side and defensive at guns or machine on one side then it is called asymetrical but unfortunately it is not
One side has unlimited reinforcements and all it need to stop advancing enemy. Other must take control of points but has only limited reinforcements. Also in map like D-Day there are prebuilt fortifications with a lot of MGs (hopefully more maps like this will come)
Although I agree about that it could be made better and more differences between both side in matter of pure force - it is mostly about different goals and objectives. That makes those modes assymetrical.
And deathmatch where all you do is run on the map and kill other would be boring. What is important too is that whole balance between different clases and infantry/vehicles is just not made for that. What is the point in deathmatch if you just get blasted by some bomb. Or machinegun squad comes and melts you.
i dont want deatchmatch but the game does nothing new in terms of asymetrical…even squad or ros2 has more asymetrical things inspite of having same 32 vs 32 setting
You obviously never played Gaijin game but kills matter the most.
The Tick counter for points consist of Squad “Lives” and points that when someone die or you loose objective go down.
It’s like this in WarThunder from day one and you can keep points but still loose if your team keep dying.
Kills are everything !
Yep, kill are everything
Post Scriptum have realism, Squad too, but this game are pure arcade style Like BF and COD 
But Devs dont want to go follow the Call of Duty route. They want to simulate real life battles in ww2. Such as Germans pushing back the Russians in Moscow, they made that template as a rush like mode and yes while kills do mean anything in ww2, its not the main takeaway from Enlisted.
No need for both. vehicle only combat, that’s WT and deathmatch thas cusine royale
And to you, if you feel adamant on like full on realism, go play Hell Let Loose or Post Scriptum since those games are full on Milsims that based EVERYTHING on realism
I played War Thunder before, but this is other game. Not relevant.
I also played Enlisted since first open tests through CAT an CBT. So i know that you can get how many kills you want but if you don’t play objective - you loose (or get carried by your teammates who understand what they are supposed to do to win).
Where did I say that? I like what Enlisted has to offer - realism mixed with some arcade mechanics that make gameplay enjoyable. I just try to explain that devs original idea about that game was not deathmatches and competitive gameplay. And the whole game is bulilt in the way that doesn’t fit such ideas.