nope. only masochists want to launch their game through 2 launchers.
maybe, but there were some other games where only minority of players come from steam
not really. WoWS is a good example. steam players show only part of the playerbase (and it is global). btw think that these numbers are without consoles cause they dont have crossplay.
They should have put unique squads there, that’s true (even tho they’re basically unique, just the weapons and icons are reused) . But definitely not the vehicles, as a significant portion of the player base might prefer infantry play.
I believe that they rushed it. Just to keep their promise of Steam release during Q1.
In support to my claim, initially the release was supposed to be without any EA. So in my opinion, they were aware that some issues could happen.
they should have created 2 new weapons for the Steam EA squads, not just copy paste existing premiums lmfao. Just spitballing ideas but maybe the SIG MKMO for Germany and the Makrykano M1943 for the Allies? Something to catch people’s attention, I don’t know. Nobody really cares if they get a squad armed with grease guns.
They should have given weapons that are iconic and recognizable by most people. M1a2 carbine engineer squad for allies would have been nice alongside with 20 round m1a1 assault squad. For the tank m22 locust would have been interesting. I am not sure what axis would get but all of the squads should be br 1-2