Can't have +-1BR? Well at least make BR1 beginner friendly!

Suggestions
1

Should BR1 only fight BR1, then we wouldn’t have this disaster of BR3 weapons and vehicles dominating new players.

If at least BR1 would be its own safe space - then we wouldn’t have BR3 facing everyone as such a problematic mechanic, no Thompson vs Arisaka, no Volkssturm Gewehr vs Mosin Nagant, no KV1 vs Panzer II.

Also if you really believe that the extra matching queues couldn’t handle this extra queue, simply make BR1 matches 50% AI controlled, new players should enjoy “easier” matches anyways.

5 Likes
2

This would only encourage veterans to play BR1 and BR5, as these BRs would be the fairest. That said, it wouldn’t help newbies because they would have even tougher enemies now. Although in terms of equipment it would be fairer.

Plus you can get BR2 equipment very fast anyway. So majority of them would not stay in this queue more much time.

2 Likes
3

Id like br 1 to be just br 1.

Nostalgia. Back to the old panzer 2 and t60 matchups (and the other small gun tanks). Was really fun early on in moscow

Added bonus that the equipment playingfield would be about as level as it can get for newbies

6 Likes
4

It totally won’t result in veteran players using br1 equipment and running triple assaulter squads.

2 Likes
5

I still believe we need ±0BR MM. I just dont see any difference between bot farm and casual player farm.

I have no hope that steam players will solve faction bias. Most likely, playing Germany will be even more cancerous than today.

2 Likes
6

I will kill them like crazy with PPD
Are you ready? Cannon fodder

7

The ultimate aim. +1

2 Likes
8

i just want to play br4 without fighting br5, i want to use good semi autos :\

1 Like
9

Separating I from the rest is the only compromise I can accept. Other than that, the BR system is perfect as is

10

The one in a million opinion.

2 Likes
11

IMG_2659
IMG_2659800×1083 152 KB

12

This looks like something an emo girl in 2009 would share.

1 Like
13

Probably. Lol
But hey, you people keep making me think of memes and I’ll send em

2 Likes
14

Well, that’s still better than the current situation, Vets with T3 guns. At least newbies have a chance with BR 1 vs BR 1 vets, vets aren’t all the good some of them just know game mechanics, and that helps them win. Their aim is not anything to brag about, especially cause of the arcade aim indicator for planes/tanks.

This is a lame argument cause it seems as if most people prefer the more powerful weapons and following the meta which is always highest BR. There is only a small niche of vets that like the lower brs for the timeline/weapons.

Stop justifying this horrible matchmaking decision from the devs and at least be open for compromise.

1 Like
15

Good for you, you think you are high and mighty killing noobs. Most likely your ass will be cannon fodder for the newbs, just get clicked on by a newbie from COD with a mosin. I wish I was there to see it lol.

16

Doesn’t make any sense. BR1 would have its own meta. Mainly 3 assaulter squads which newbies can’t get in any way.

17

Still better than META BR 3 squads versing fresh players. Are you even understanding your own argument?

1 Like
18

There is a clear power difference that skill can only do so much to balance comparing BR 1 to BR 3. As a newb, I’d rather face BR 1 submachine guns than full goated BR 3 squads. What are you smoking?

1 Like
19

No, you clearly do not understand my point. Since the scenario you are presenting is very situational and definitely not consistent.

Plus as I have said, you can get BR2 Equipment very soon anyway. I doubt newbies would stay at BR1 just because it would be better for them, lol.

20

pure BR 1 line ups are barely a thing so i thing it will be pretty fair. Some stuff might be needed to be up tiered to BR II like the IAR 81C, Panzer III J and the T-70.

1 Like