It seems naohm is also here.
Most of germanyâs MGs are belt fed?
2 Likes
even me
I literally didnât even know this was in the game. Have never been killed by one. Good job pointing out that youâre the only one abusing it. 
Mg 34 y 42 yes they have a belt version also the fire rate insât correct itâs actually 900rmp but it should be 1200 Even faster than ppsh
MG 34, MG 42, MG 34 P, are all belt fed guns. They donât have different versions one being belt fed and another not. The belt just sits in the drum looking container. The low tier MGs are mag fed, and the only exception in high tier is the MG 15.
There are a lot of guns in this game that donât have realistic rate of fire. Itâs for balancing and honestly what is a couple hundred rounds a minute more going to do for you when its already at a 1,000?..other then just waste your limited ammo and make recoil even worse?The MG34 and 42 already kill in a fraction of a second. If you want to argue the dispersion should be lower thatâs great, but the rate of fire? Cmon
Well mg42 had 2 versions one with 900rpm and the other with 1200 i Heard that the most used was the 1200 version (thats the why i argumenting that fire rate should be accurate)
Also the dispersion is fine i think, i can kill enemies like a sniper just shooting 2-3 bullets per click but i completly agree about giving the mg42 a 100 bullets belt version, because the mg15 just sucks if the mg42 and 34 are hard to control the dispersion with the mg 15 is imposible Even at mid range
I think the argument is flawed.
You can take any squad and get 100+ kills with it, you also were bragging prior to this post about your 100+ kill games where you werent using GL, should we limit/nerf those guns too?
oh look a 9 man type hei squad getting 100+ kills by themselves, should we limit this squad to 3 max of having that one type of gun?
Yes, i agree with this. Germany is definitely due for a 100 round belt.
2 Likes
Why should this weapon be limited to âhistorically accurateâ when nothing else ise?
1 Like
Itâs hard to abuse it at BR5 and thatâs where iâm playing it most of the time, when i peek for too long while calculating range in my head i can get murdered instantly by STG44/snipers/tanks.
Itâs also only useful in situations where you have the high ground otherwise you will nuke yourself since that mortar shell has massive drop off.
Because its overpowered you doofus
youâre insecure if you think im bragging
the difference is that its incredibly easy, requiring such little input and effort to achieve the same result with a grenade launcher
compared to actually having to aim, and focusing on the game, to get a similar score with normal weapons
Its not op on its own. You just abuse it against major bots matches without any issues
MajorMcDonalds and Ghostweed are some of the best players in the game though? So why do you keep calling me out for âbotâ matches. You just suck with Grenade Launchers dude, and I donât know how thats possible, cause they are SO EASY to use.
You are so incredibly ignorant its unreal
1 Like
spamming GL isnt a skill
What does that have to do with you?
Do you play in Allies only? If so, you play mostly against bots as German mains just desert matches except some people who wants pain. Japan main communities are quite small unlike Soviets, Allies, and Germany.
Well if you play in Soviet vs German battles, 90% of the time the squad dies from random shots from a lot of smart asses or tanks.
If you abuse something, go ahead build it however you see fit and good for you. Some people abuse double lmg as a way to get 200+ round in mag easily so will you vouch for removing double primary weapons and force people to use backpacks only? Some people bring 3 impact grenades which is same as GL spam but its better, so will you remove impact grenades?
Ronald McSpamer?
Not impressive.
I posted a screenshot of my results using GL against them?
What other reason would I mention them if not that they are an example of NOT BOT GAMES that I am using GL against?
