Su-5-2 for Soviet，M41 for USA and type4 ho-ro for Japan
8 Likes
Certainly as future event rewards, they would all be cool to see. Though in the case of the US, I think Id rather see something with a shorter gun, maybe the Priest or Sexton? Maybe even the Bishop?
4 Likes
I am not sure about this one, having only 4 shots available doesnt sound very fun or useful to me
3 Likes
I don’t think adding more low tier nuke tanks would be very healthy for the game.
4 Likes
We don’t need HE spam in low BR. Stop asking for large-splash guns.
4 Likes
If anything, 15cm sIG 33 B Sfl should be BR 3. It’s similar in passive domination to the Pz.III Ausf.N, but it trades a turret and a little bit of reload for MASSIVE HE shells.
This sort of thing is always going to make Enlisted worse to play, because passively sitting in the back of a map is something the devs should avoid rewarding in an objective-based game.
3 Likes
Ho-Ro would be awesome as an event, but probably not something that should be TT
1 Like
Weird.
Since it’s so powerful, I would expect it to see it dominate in every BR2 match with Germany 
.
But somewhat that’s not what is happening. And it’s already pretty rare vehicle.
3 Likes
I see it in every BR2 game (with Germany) and often BR3. Not rare at all.
2 Likes
The capabilities of a 150mm HE shell at BR 2 are just too high. It creates the standard that the OP has highlighted with this very post, that now every other nation should have similar capabilities at this tier.
For the balancing health of every BR 1 and 2 piece of equipment, and for the sanity of all the newer players that can run into this thing, larger explosives need to be in higher tiers, period (especially if they have a larger blast radius, more shrapnel, and a faster reload than a KV-2 two whole battle ratings higher at BR 4).
4 Likes
Yes, because the only thing that matters when balancing a ground vehicle is the size of the caliber.
- It doesn’t matter that the tank has limited ammo capacity, half of which is completely pointless Heats (its He having much more reliable AT capabilities)
- It doesn’t matter that the vehicle has a crew with no cover, who have no MG or the ability to use personal weapons
- It doesn’t matter that the vehicle has no turret or armor.
It only matters that it has a large caliber. That’s your dogma.
You’re not looking for the good balance, which could potentially be just reducing its rate of fire.
You just want it to be nerfed into oblivion.
And it’s hilarious that you compare it to KV-2, a tech tree (it is not limited in number) tank that basically no one plays and certainly isn’t effective in a typical Enlisted match. (Btw. KV-2 can easily go to BR3, even though I was initially of opposite opinion).
You’ve just unleashed some utterly cheap dogma. And that’s it.
Tho the dogmatic cries of people like you, the developers have rightly decided not to uptier it. You are simply wrong.
5 Likes
give me 10 
1 Like
the sphs you said are 105mm caliber level，their opponent are wespe and type 1 Ho-ni 2。
I think join 105mm caliber sph also good idea
They are, I just think it might be nice to have them as a faster firing version, since the western allies , didnt really have the same idea of an assault gun in the 150mm range.
Faster 
Higher
Stronger
1 Like