-Moscow I-III
-Stalingrad I-III
-Tunisia I-IV
-Rzhev I-IV
-Normandy III-V
-Ardenes III-V
-Berlin III-V
-Pacific I-V
This would allow BR IV to be more viable and allow players to refine their map preferences without using the upcoming planned map filters.
Anti-freedom post. BR for Tunisia is fine, Forcing normandy and Ardennes up is german cope.
Why should Tunisia (the least popular campaign) be spread over more BRs than Normandy (the most popular campaign)?
It realistically doesn’t make any sense.
Moscow should be BRI-V at least most of those maps. They are really generic with random slavic villages and can be any village of the recaptured Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, Lithuania.
I don’t want to play Berlin + Normandy/Ardennes 24/7, we really need Leningrad for high BR and also some new Eastern Europe maps of 43-45.
I agree about Tunisia being able to be played at BR4 it would avoid some nasty spam and have some cool historical German vehicles and weapons used there (Separation from BR5 is a must too)
I agree, it gets quite boring playing the same maps over and over again. Moscow would definitely be welcomed in my opinion
Berlin for BR1-5 i want play my Volkssturm
apparently because Panthers, Firefly and Tigers actually fought in Africa.
you mean map preference? or do you mean current testing of all maps on all BR?
cause if you want this to replace map preference i vehemently disagree.
Only Tiger H1 though. Neither Panther nor Firefly saw action in Tunisia.
oh right, I forgot
moscow maps were thought from 1941 to 1944, not having them in BR5 which also includes the 1944 normandy campaign is nonsense.
stalingrad was from 1942-1943, which should be br3-4 (so also br2 and 5 players will sometimes get it
— and so on, i wont waste time explaining more numbers, but ppl here need to start learning some basic data before forming any opinions.
this is what I suggested time ago and many jump to my throat like if I was heretical
Get off my post you sad child
How about you learn the difference between fought and thought before you post your passive aggressive superiority post. Stop kidding yourself, you know that the Moscow maps in game are based on early war battles. Therefore earlier equipment should be used in them. They are also not built for high BR matches, king tigers are dominating the open long terrain.
That’s not what I said. I said having different BRs tied to different maps would make players have to play different BRs instead of playing 5 constantly. It’s a way to refine what maps you want to play without using the upcoming system.
Honestly all maps, all BRs is just the simplest solution. BR is just equipment rating. I don’t know why they separated maps in the first place
The only next step is map preference
They separated them originally to try and keep some form of historical accuracy, with the exception of some balancing reasons. Low BR gear on early war maps.
The source is literally data that Robihr pulled from the replay page before the merge.
Tunisia was the least populated campaign, while Normandy was the most populated campaign by a lot.
If you want, look it up in the Topics he created. 