Like just in that above sentence ?
Butthurt ? :----------------------------------------------DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDd
But but but it might be fine if its soviet right
Like always.
You keep replying tryig to prove a point youâve lost for the 20th time.
Yeah because⌠âmainâ right?
big letters for you: ALL TIME TRAVELLLING EQUIPMENT IS HORRIBLE
sure
Quite sure ive done it now more than once.
You seem to have oddly much time to âproveâ otherwise.
Yep
But but but except some soviet equipment but but right ?
Use google translate to your native language: âallâ.
Youâve definitely made a mess in your pants more than once trying to argue maths and proving me as a âmainâ or comparing T-50 being as historically inaccurate as F2 lol
apparently your âallâ doesnt include soviet equipment so I suppose we have different dictionary
Yeah u got me there, after all im the one trying to prove myself not maining but accidentally forgetting certain things of my favorite faction
This is exactly where your whataboutism and rather selective historical accuracy comes in play.
T-50 isnât time travelling at least. Bad but not back to the future bad.
Why is this hard to comprehend? I literally spelled points 1 and 2 for you.
Your dictionary must be missing the entry âexamplesâ
theere we go buddy, little bit of selective historical accuracy
Does examples translate as âGerman stuffâ in soviet language ?
Literally have been spelling out the same thing for you:
Your native tongue must equate âexamplesâ and âexhaustive listâ, not my fault if any language is deficient.
its quite simple, if you want historical accuracy you want historical accuracy. Theres no âbutsâ âatleastâ or âifsâ
Which you for apparent reason cant understand since ur maining soviets.
Your exhausted of typing 3 equipments that conveniently are germans.
:----------------------------------------------------------------------DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDd
Go be soviet main somewhere else
Just remove T-50 and stop this madness.
Yeah, sorry im above that childish insulting stuff u cant drag me to your level.
Was it there ? No it wasnt.
Theres no fiddling room in historical accuracy.
Surely you can understand that if you put your maining feelings aside and think rationally for once.
Most likely wasnât.
But it was an active unit in PKKA at that time.
Hence - itâs bad.
Time travelling stuff like MKB or F2 (yes, AS-44 and RPD included, jesus) werenât.
Hence - these are even worse.
on operation winter storm there are photos of tiger 1âs in stalingrad. so they could easly add them there.
i dont know how far stalingrad campaign is or will go, so if stalingrad campaign goes atleast around that scenario of the Don-front , sure⌠historical accuracy.
1 Like
In the city?
afaik there are none such photos but I would be curious to see.
Again afaik the ârelieve forceâ with Tigers was sent but never reached Stalingrad, defeated by the Red Army in Stalingradâs vicinity.
Obviously that wouldnât stop DF from âdoing a little trollingâ and putting Tigers onto the streets of Stalingrad, but seing how T-34/85 or IS-1 definitly did not exist, thereâs nothing that could counter the Tiger so DF probably wonât.
The t34s and su76 present can pen and destroy the tiger on customs thoâŚ
Everyone whining about how historical inaccuracies exist in Moscow, but no one seems to notice the Springfield, M1 Bazooka, M2 Carbine, P-38G-1, Jumbo, Bf 110, both Bf 109s, Me 410, Ju 188 and Panzer IV J in Normandy.
3 Likes
Moreover the ahistorical equipment noted is only the german one, like the fedorov,avs36 in berlin are historically accurate
Ps
ovp in tunisia,beretta1918 in normandy
All of them are bad.
But at least it makes some sense for something old like the Springlfied to appear rather than straight up time travellers from the future or weapons which were never even adopted by the militaries.
(plus personally I barely play Normandy)
It makes just as much sense for old equipment that was not there to be there as it does for equipment that time traveled there. Hell, Iâd argue the Jumbo makes more sense than the Springfield or the P-38G, as the time frame of itâs service in the region is closer than any of the outdated equipment. The Springfield makes the least sense of any of this equipment, as itâs not even a model the US army had in stock anymore during even the start of WW2.
2 Likes
Once again, I have little idea about US equipment, so Iâll speak about the front I am more familiar with:
when the Germans invaded and the PKKA had to scrap for whatever they had to defend Moscow, you really would see anything from Fedorov Avtomats to Lews Guns captured from the British intervention forces in 1918-19 in Murmansk and Arkhangelsk.
Similarly, from the German side, everything that was captured/stolen/taken from the central/eastern european nations was taken to Russia to try and deal the final blow: from French trucks to Czech tanks.
As such, seeing not-so-accurate but still plausible Madsen or ZB-26 in Moscow feels somewhat appropriate (speaking only about my personal impression), while MKB or âearlyâ MG-42 simply were not part of the Wehrmacht firearms selection back then.
Similarly, items like AS-44 or RPD, despite having been developed around 1944, were not issued to the troops or adopted by the military when Berlin happened.
Me 163 Komet is a great example of how flying a plane in 1941 doesnât make it a fitting addition to any 1941-43 campaign at all.