Which part of “conveniently forgetting bullshit equipment of soviets” you didnt understand ?
You moronism about “maining” while ignoring simple maths was too astounding.
Ask your kindergarten teacher to tell you the definition of the English word “main” tomorrow, kiddo.
You do understand that maining certain faction doesnt exclude you playing others ? Simply means your favoring certain faction, soviets in this case by conveniently forgetting your favorite factions bullshit equipment while moaning of others.
Cry some more about “forgetting Soviet equipment”. Please do.
i think that there could be a middle ground in this:
-the tech tree would be vast and it would not be separate for each campaign, instead it will be separated from campaigns and it would be one giant tech tree that unlocks items, so you can research for a single item and have that be used across all campaigns, of course in some cases some items would be unusable depending on the item and timeline, for example a stg44 in early war.
and the tech tree research wont change if you switch over to a different campaign, you will still have the same research progress and researched weapons unless the weapon isnt available at that campaign (timeline constraints), so that unavailable weapon will just simply be greyed out and unobtainable until you switch back to a campaign where that item/weapon is available.
it wouldnt make sense to be able to research and get a late war weapons in a early war scenario, and the research would be capped based off of the timeline constraints.
so lets say we’re in early war, we can only research so much before we cant research anymore, then we would have to move to late war campaign in order to continue the research
Sorry, my eyesight aint like it was when I was young but pardon me can you point out where in that exact list is the soviet equipment ?
Thanks
You might want to learn the definition of “exhaustive list” and “giving examples” first.
So simple “mkb etc” wouldnt have cut it ?
Ah examples, conveniently the ones bother you unlike soviet equipments.
The holy trinity of time travellers that comes to mind. Problem?
No, if u can prove they werent there ? I mean according to you its theoretically possible t-50 was there.
So why not the others as well.
I’ve told you countless times T-50 has no evidence of being there. It is bad.
The holy trinity hadn’t even been adopted by the military during Moscow. They are even worse.
Capiche?
Ah, so thats where u draw the line this time.
But fedorov is again “fine” regardles theres absolutely 0 evidence of it being in moscow ?
Always has been.
You are welcome to cry about me “maining” something for the 50th time though.
Not really, its been shifting quite often between “atleast it was invented” / “atleast it was used somewhere else”
Depending ofc which ever narrative fits your needs.
My lines have always been
- is there any evidence of it being used in said battle?
- was it at least adopted by the military by that time?
If both are “no” then NO.
Feel free to quote me saying something contrary to this or saying T-50 is perfectly fine.
1 Like
Here we have the “atleast it existed” argument.
Yes, see point 2 in my list.
There’s “bad” and there’s “the worst”.
T-50 is bad but at least it was adopted by 1941-42.
Well there you go that one was without “bad” on it.
And here we again have the “but but but atleast”
I’ve never said it wasn’t bad.
Why so butthurt? lmao
Time travelling equipment is simply horrible.