You forgot the most important and fun one:
- 9: MOON CAMPAIGN
Enough said.
3 Likes
I like this brainstorming and I hope the devs are looking at it. But I hope everyone agrees campaigns as of right now are not sustainable.
everyone knows that campaigns are not sustainable. it is just matter of approach on how to handle rework.
You could use the âyearâ as a sort of WarThunderâs âbattle ratingâ meaning the squads with 1943 equipment could only be spawned on the maps relevant to 1943 and later, but this too âsplitsâ player base in a similar way how WarThunder does. Inevitable, the âyearâ will turn into âbrâ and just as in WT, you will get some undesired overlaps when matchmaking.
When I was thinking about a different way to organize âprogressionâ I thought of something similar to WT tech tree but without a split by nations.
Major nodes are squads, sub nodes of squads are their equipment.
Then Map decides which squads are allegeable for use by the player out of those that he unlocked. Kind of how itâs done in Sim battles in WT.
This way you wonât see a German level 3 MG squad with MG-42 in a 1941 for example, or on Tunisia map.
And thatâs what we are discussion 
Basically what we have with SG and Moscow⌠at least for the most part.
Still same shit show.
Funny how the mg42 wo showed up in tunisia as first time, is excluded to join in tunisia for you
Ohh, I thought itâs not there, so itâs bad example then.
Yeap, imho itâs more of a specific map problem than a whole campaign problem with weapons. If selections of squads is map based, one could limit not only types of squads but specific levels of squads on maps. So some maps would have access to basic aviation or tanks for example.
Like if the map is âthemedâ to paratroopers fighting garrison infantry, you could appropriately allow only relevant squads on that map.
From the player perspective, you would see a list of maps currently in rotation and choose whichever is more appropriate to what you already unlocked or want to unlock.
there should be a eastern front early and a eastern front late as two sperate theatres
as well as a western fron 1939-41, western front 1944 and a western front 1945
1 Like
that is 5 fronts⌠then you would need pacific early and pacific late, africa, italy/mediterranean. so minimum 9 fronts. in a game where even 5 campaigns is overkillâŚ
FTFY:
- Eastern front
- Western front
But yeah Eastern front would definitely need a division to Early and Late with no bullshit MKBs, MG-42s and Pz IV F2s in Moscow.
Oh waitâŚ
I see you conveniently forgot the t-50âs.
But as you always say definitely playing both sides not maining soviets.
Your paranoia is your issue only.
But conveniently forgot the soviet stuff.
Hard to figure which you main.
âmainâ⌠lmao
Youâll have to deal with your paranoia on your own.
Totally not maining soviets just conveniently forgot the bullshit equipment of soviets.
Can you not count? lmao
What âmainingâ while having equal matches played for both sides?