If 10 people shoot themselves in the face with a shotgun, you are going to shoot yourself in the face with a shotgun yes? After all, why try and stop the trend instead of going with what everyone is doing.
As for the name of a company. Square Enix. Primarily to do with FF14, they’ve added time and time again features requested by the community so many times we lost track.
New type of vehicles is really nice, but fixed gun? Maps are too small for them, anything that is on your flank is your death.
Also I don’t like that MG34 with patronentrommel is a separate gun. It makes a little sence as the top cover is replaced in comparason to normal MG34. But if you will do the same for the belt fed version of MG34 or MG42, then I have no idea what’s wrong with you.
Well, I guess proper upgrade system was always out of question.
People complaining about heavy tanks when all you have to do is blow up their tracks.
This could lead to the introduction of adhesive explosives too but oh well.
I must say, in all honesty, I’m not excited for the vehicles announced here. My thoughts in detail as follows;
The IV/70 chosen isn’t ideal for Germany, having clear weakspots on the front, though I understand if the Su-85M is it’s counterpart. Yet at the same time, that it is placed at a higher position in the campaign tree than the Panther leaves the question as to why someone would want to use it. I would recommend swapping the T-34-85 and the Panther G with these two self-propelled guns, as it would make more sense as to a feeling of progression.
The fact that it was decided to add self-propelled anti-tank guns rather than infantry-support guns, like the Brummbär / Sd.Kfz. 166 and the ISU-152, also seems puzzling to me, given the infantry focus of the game. Such vehicles would at least make sense in their presence, whereas I cannot understand why someone would chose either the PzIV/70 or SU-85M over their tank counterparts in Enlisted, given the presence of infantry and the comparative rarity of tanks - and their tank counterparts having effectively equivalent anti-tank capability as well.
Were they instead something like the Jagdpanther and SU-100, they at least would have some actual capability advantage in the anti-tank role, there would be a point to such anti-tank vehicles, but that is not what we see here.
As for planes, the fact that relatively common planes were chosen to be premiums also is puzzling to me. There are quite a few choices that could have been made premium that were far rarer in use, that would be quite exciting for the community, so why such weren’t considered just… confuses me.