The G41 and Type 4 should realistically have Johnson reload speed. Or slightly slower to acknowledge the faster tubular magazine reloader it had in real life. But not by much.
1 Like
Sight… yet another console gamer that is too lazy to check actual stats of weapons
M21/28 has much better dmg, better relaod speed, mediocre rof, amazing recoil much lower than Kiraly and much much lower dispersion and very crucial visual recoil that is also lower, so how it’s worse than Kiraly?
It’s superior than Kiraly, i don’t care about 10 more rounds when my 30 rounds will hit more often than Kiraly and you can actually hit headshots pretty nicely, while Kiraly struggles hard.
Armor of American tanks is irrelevant as your Crusader cannon will pen any German tank at BR2-3 as it has 122mm of pen. M8 Scott has amazing heat shells plus 50 cal. I can spam 3 of them and it’s devastating vs enemy infantry and tanks. You can’t spam anything that is as quickly and as destructive as them as panzers are way too slow. 50mm of Germany sucks they are only good vs uptiers, their HE is a joke vs American long 57mm/short 75mm. After they took away pz3n from BR2 there are zero reason to play as BR2 Germany anymore. None of their BR2 tanks have any armor.
And no 4E has 30mm of armor so stop lying. F1 has 50mm of turret armor but there are not a single tank that can’t pen it’s irrelevant thin armor. 30 or 50mm? there are no difference you need at least 75mm to resist shells.
wrong and objectively a lie
Again you don’t understand goal of those weapons, none of you do. American BAR is pretty much like FG42 that is vastly superior in real matches to MG34, much faster ADS speed, amazing sprint speed and great weapon handling you always use it to storm points and flank enemies with it’s superior to SMGs dmg, while MG34 is ultra bulky, slow to ADS, behaves awfully when moving, slow to reload it’s bad at attacking and can be only used effectively at defense (aka you lose the match 50% of the time)
BAR always wins and is the best MG at BR3.
1 Like
Americans have Garand + Johnson combo for total of 18 rounds.
So why Germany will be forced to have just one garbage semi (or just fine post buff) at BR3 instead of two like Americans? Anti German bias as always.
PS i can also use combo of even more op semi that is Winchester M1907 x Johnson for total of 30 rounds at BR3.
7.9 to 8.2 is a difference without meaning
stop presenting youre ‘data’ mined dispersion rates as fact
the guns have semi and full auto even if correct youre data could be for semi auto
and if you think the bar is best br3 mg and mg34 thats a skill issue not a game issue
as for the garand johnson combo thats an exploit not a game feature
besides the g41 g43 combo you want to create would be unfair as well
Good thing that they only keep on buffing Soviets and Americans so it’s time to overbuff Germany as they’ve been neglected for past 2 years (at least at around BR2-3). M38/42 buff was just correction to have real stats not a massive buff as anyone expected. Same can be said about FG42 it was just correction to have same values as irl weapon. And FG42 II still suffer vs body armor and Soviets just received AVT-40 20 that is easier to use than FG42 II due lower rof. So what buff are we talking about?
You’re questioning a helper? It was created by euthymia. I’ll link the post to the data sheet.
Both have different uses. Yes, you can attack / defend with both quite well, but most of the time you will be on the offensive (attacking objectives, pushing players back from the grey zone if defending). The BAR is better in this scenario (and most cases in Enlisted).
I don’t use combo weapons ever. I only use the backpack because I find that more effective for me. But as long as G41 gets buffed, I will be happy.
2 Likes
The FG 42 “buff” was a change no one asked for. It made the FG 42 even worse, and the decision to use the FG 42 II instead even easier. Now you will only see the FG 42 II. They should’ve added a bayonet or made some other meaningful change instead to differentiate the two.
In fact, I would’ve preferred a FG 42 with same fire rate, but with the bayonet instead. AVT and AVS both have bayonets (right, I’m only in BR IV so I’ve only encountered them or picked them up). It would’ve been much more meaningful than increasing RPM to unusable territory.
you said it has same dmg but it’s not true
Oh so we will arguing that it’s not real? Mate if it’s not real then it’s only in your head. Kiraly is inferior weapon that can’t handle shooting for more than 2 secs, dispersion makes it a garbage smg. So where are you stats and counter argument rather than “don’t use it, cuz don’t ok?”. I will keep presenting the data because data is always right and you are wrong.
no it won’t, it always uses data for automatic especially for smg and mg
lmao what a joker. I’m loving destroying you Germans carrying your bulky MG34 with my BAR and always proving you wrong every single match. But anyway thank for your gun i will be using it once i ran out of my rounds in my BAR.
Oh really so when are you going to ban thousands of players? Secondary wepaons were always a game feature, everyone can carry two weapons once you unlock them as your skill. It’s your inability to use what game provides to you.
that’s the point, unfair vs unfair. That’s what players want but shame that it’s only American and Soviet players that want to keep unfair things given to them but when Germans demand a fair same treatment then you see booos. So we either keep it fair and give Germany some new toys + buffs or remove/nerf your guns.
It seems like it was just excuse to give soviets Avt-40 20 that is in my opinion a better weapon than FG42 II. More rof is never better past 750 rpm when it’s paired with worse dispersion and recoil direction.
1 Like
Wake up, the M39 isn’t that hard to control, and what good stuff does the American BR4 have? The “Jumbo” M4A2 76W? You want me to use these things to defeat Tiger tanks and Panther Gs? And that damn 20-round machine gun—when the Germans were already using 75-round machine guns, the Americans were still stuck with 20-round ones.
1 Like
yes but its only unfair when you equip the johnson and garand
moving the g43 to br3 would be unfair all the time
unfair if the g41 43 are equipped together
vs garand johnson combo
unfair if the enemy has the g43 and you have the johnson or garand by itself
yes being unfair is standard practice but this is too far
I asked.
1 Like
While in reality Garand + johnson combo is stronger than G41+G43 combo as their stats are just superior. You can check it on your own if you don’t believe me. While right now BR3 balance it’s just extra unfair in every single way vs Germany and nobody seem to care.
1 Like
How many semi-automatic rifles are in your squad? I wouldn’t use a 9-man infantry squad in BR3. A commando squad having 2 semi-automatic rifles is already the maximum, and the BAR and 1928A1 simply can’t defeat the ZK383 and MG34.
Not everyone has super human aim like you. Only sweats say the Kiraly is fine.
What’s wrong with it? You can’t pen them and they can’t pen you. Win win in my books
I actually quite enjoy it. Stop using it as an MG and start using it as an SMG or AR. then you’ll see how unstoppable it is
1 Like
Pure nonsense. ZK 383 has cramped sights and just feels off. I’ve killed more people in BR III with my trusty MP 40 than with the ZK 383.
The MG 34, that has 5.5 second reload and dumps a magazine in the same time? BAR has auto slow, wayyyy faster reload, and better stats overall.
I would just say this is anti German bias
----------m1----jn-----g41-----f43
Rod. 320. 320. 320. 320
Dam. 12.7. 12.7. 12. 12.7
…mag 8. 10. 10. 10
Sorry but the only weak stats are in the g41 damage ok boost to 12.7 won’t change anything
And the g43 is just better then the grand
We need more stats than just damage, ROF, and magazine size for an actual comparison.
Huh? The MG34 can shred an entire squad in 3 seconds—can the BAR do that? The ZK383 has such excellent accuracy, fire rate, and recoil control, yet you insist on using the MP40?
2 Likes
and how should this be understood?
1 Like