The idea to make the m1a1 br2 was terrible in my opinion, for example here is the a good example of a br2 Thompson:
The USMC Thompson has been competitive since I bought it in the Pacific and it still is powerful at br2. The great time to kill and good recoil control is balanced by a small magazine.
Vs a OP br2 Thompson
the m1a1 has similar recoil control but with a more reasonable rpm it is way better, not to mention it’s 30 round mag.
So I suggest:
•either put the m1a1 at br3 again or modify the assets model to be a 20 round magazine:
again either keep thompsons at br 2 3 4 5 or move all 30 round thompsons to br3
either 30 round thompsons are good from br 2 to br 4 or they should all be at br3
No
H/V ratio of M1A1 and USMC is 0.38 vs 0.25, lower is better
Cause H reocil in this game affect random recoil offset in all direction
You would rather have high V recoil than H recoil, cause the first one is predictable
I can’t win with my level two Allies no matter what weapons I carry. I have excellent squads, yet Level two Allies is the only Allied level that I cannot win in, so I rarely play it.
Please, this needs to be changed, look its bad enough the soviets have broken shit, its just unfun as the allies to also have broken shit, BR3 or a 20rnd mag, Id much rather the 20rnd mag I should mention.