While you guys still have a KT from a gray zone, better ROF and recoil fg with good option - more or less ROF - you can chose - this questions you can address to yourself
Everything you talk about - have the other side of old good axis. Everything.
So complaining about always the same weak - yeah that’s fun
Same goes to soviets with the AVS and AVT but tbh none of this guns actually needed a RoF buff the FG42 (at least the II versión) never needed it because it’s small magazine
I’m also wondering why it’s recoil wasnt lowered like AVS since the devs mentioned that due the rof buff they also Will buff recoil
And all this is just an excuse for never improving FG42 II dispersion and giving it’s bayonet
Good? Maybe on Br4 but this BR doesnt exists what a shame
And You are going to mention the MG42 100 ok i admmit is good weapon (on CQB only) but RD-44 is better for being overall a more decent gun that can be used on all ranges and move while shooting unlike MG42 which is forced to be on Short ranges
You better wanna look into the Sovietboos posts these are Even more ridículous
“Add TT silenced guns to URRS”
“URRS to weak”
“Add more unnecesary powercreep”
“Body armor is a myth is does not affect on anything”
And when it comes to the KT-H remember you can do the same to germans with KV-1 on downtiers and T28-E on br 1-2 (but is way more less reliable than first option)
And what the German mains do? Ofc complain but we only get nonsense from ignorants as a reply
And i alredy told You "do You really struggles killing a tank with 5 years of experience on your back? Just use a plane bro use that SU-9 Cannon designed to send this kind of tanks out the Window and if You preffer bomb it instead, use panzerfausts use the AT cannons that have more pen than Germany ones
Or just play with fire and send another tank straight to their head
And if you have more than 4 slots You have SO much variety and stuff aviable on ur hands
Again, we are talking about br 5. So lets do it. I don’t know nothing about KV I ain’t play it more then once at this 5 years even with a special victory camo. Why? It’s not worth it. I prefer black STZ T-34. And then comes to a br 5.
I ain’t started about Mg 42 100 but yeah I do like all this br 5 axis machines of death. In my squad mg man is a last. So he’s often at the position then I took control. And then I don’t need to run and jump (as you might like to if you speak about fire while moving)
I need a guddam mg - lying and fire - wipe entire squads with mg15, mg42 100, mg81. Yes, I do need a trophy mg to soviets btw. I prefer this style of gameplay not the kiddo ones with running and firing.
So ya with mg 1 / 1 . axis can’t say they are weak. It fun with all this stuff
Also there was my prem dp with a 100 rounds. Now it nerfed to oblivion and taken to br 4 nobody plays. Thx for crying
Far from meta how? I bring one mggunner at rifleman squad so yes I use it in my meta.
Everytime I hear - take a plane to destroy something - I say no - the main goal of this game is to protect or attack point. So I do it.
If everytime I will took a plane to destroy another GREY zone KT - all my points will be lost. So for now KT is brilliant tank for all purposes but not an IS-2.
I really don’t know why you still have a right to complain about something.
Actually AVT for now is not bad, but increase ROF for a 100 will be historically accurate and bring more balance and comfort to gameplay
You right IS is an ISsue. In this game axis can’t actually complain about 5 br for sure.
I really can’t agree with an armor cause average player does not know about. You can find it out in a every game. Much more often you see a mosin rifles there.
All the armor issue of an IS written in game - it have less armor and much longer reload speed. You don’t need to buy something besides an us-2 to understand it for sure
Exept there is no mention of armor pen for the KT so any amount of armor you can see on the IS is meaningless. And reload times also got removed from the UI so no that also isnt an issue by your logic.
I am not complaining about the tanks, so feel free to yell at the designers of the IS 2 to “desgin a better tank” as clearly the IS 2 must have been a terrible design that had no chance during WW2.
Or ask for a better tank that existed like everyone else.
“Thx for crying” XD bro really thanks i’m crying, all i’m doing is make fun of your pointless statements
And now You tecnically Say “prefferences” what a cheap argument
I never Said that is weak is just the fact that the URRS equipment is Even more cracked
So where is Opel blitz? That rubbish called Sdk 7 is slow asf
And btw remember that Germany has to wait 4 YEARS to get the MG42 100 while both US and URRS alredy had +2 belt fed Even Japan had a 100 rounds MG (tecnically)
Lol, Sdkfz251 is much better them M3 halftrack. Good mg 42 and useless needed Brauning without shield.
Event APC with 75-mm gun which wipe squads.
Man, talk with you a really enjoy, that’s fun
Dp27 with 100 was a premium unit which is needed to oblivion because of somebody crying. So now we’re is very strong mg 42 100 and rubbish MT. That’s annoying. I want normal damage mg in soviet TT.
Don’t change topic i’m reffering to the “TT tractor” cataloged as an APC.
You can tecnically do the same while having RMN-50 on Ur hands and most Ppl who use this APC I’ve Saw them using only for spawning ppl is insanelly weird occasions when i Saw them shooting with it (absolute dumb) bro was wasting the hability of shooting while spawning ppl
Well basically You guys alredy had other 2 mg’s (maybe a Lil bit worse) but still decent and now I Guess that we didint had the MG42 100 on those days so maybe thats why
And yet Even if DP27 with 100 bullets its unerfed be sure that ppl Will still preffer using the RD44 for being more versatile
Soon or later Gaijin is gonna give You smt like that just keep complaining and magically Gaijin is gonna do some magic