My Nick does no have any relevance on this conversation what are You trying to tell me :_:?
And when it comes to switching the topic i said that cuz i specificly mentioned
I know name is wrong but im directly reffering to the TT vehicle not the premium or event one
And well when it comes to 75mm APC i gotta at admmit is good ok? Theres no APC with Big guns like it (something Unique that Germany have but yet we need more Unique stuff and usefull selection)
I alr mentioned it i was reffering to the TT one not the premium and the Event versión which ofc is way more decent at least
Theres no one on the Game yet but i can guarantee that if is asked soon or later it Will be implemented
I am asking for Lend-lease universal carrier about 2 years and still it don’t add
So anyway I can tell - there is some options for axis boys in apc question. Opel blitz will be good addition too and it will be 4-th apc. Soviets have 2 btw
Probably or even most likely, considering everything must be slightly better or equal in soviet arsenal and how much pampered faction it is id expect them to get captured kt2 or T90 to compensate.
What do you suggest then?
More prototypes like the T44 100?
Or another time traveling magic vehicle a T54 like the Su 9?
Have your T44 100 then.
I want a Jagdtiger a vehicle that actually saw combat in ww2.
I agree with that.
It will be balaced and it should be in the Soviet tech tree as well, just like the t34 100 should be.
Just like the Mp41r should be the the Axis tech tree.
I hope they do add it for the Soviets.
Kind of a nitpick but the first T-54 prototype was built and tested before the end of WW2 so adding that specific prototype would not actually be a Su-9 situation.
Anyways I think adding the Jadgtiger is a bad idea and would make balancing top tier tanks a bigger pain in the ass.
Eh I think the T-34-100 would be a worse option for a tech-tree addition than other options like the T-44-100 or, hell, even the first prototype T-54. The massive miss-match between its very powerful 100mm gun but very poor (for BR5) T-34 armour means that you either end up with a terrible BR5 tank or an (probably) overpowered BR4 tank. And it’s not like adding the T-34-100 would be any more historical than those other options.
Different sources list different dates on the T54.
Ill admit i was wrong on that.
You think the Jagdtiger will be unbalanced but not the t44 100?
The Jagdtiger is very poweful head on yes but vulnerable to flanking and bombing.
The t44 100 is a proto mbt.
The only Axis armanent that can reliably penetrate the T44 is the 128mm.
What would you suggest the Maus?
Yeah, just BR3 smgs at BR2.
Best plane.
Since the PZ3N disappeared due to river of tears, could easily argue they got the best tanks there too.
Better AT zooka.
But I totally see where you coming from, not having mg is like OP as having sniper rifle with bayonet.
I don’t know what you’re talking about in regards to the T-44 its frontal turret armour is only 120mm thick, that isn’t some crazy high levels of protection. Its LFP is also very penetratable and, thanks to the fact that it doesn’t have a frontal transmission to eat any shots, shooting it there is going to result in a very easy kill especially considering that the tank also stores ammo at the front.
Also “it’s vulnerable to flanking” isn’t a good defense for the Jadgtiger at all. Firstly, every bloody tank is vulnerable to flanking (this also applies to getting bombed). Secondly, the maps and general gameplay of Enlisted is not built for tanks flanking and stuff this isn’t War Thunder.
Im sorry but i dont agree with you at all.
The models are from war thunder.
The T44 100 is extremely mobile and hitting the turret is no easy feat with a slow and cumbersome heavy tank or td.
What do you think is more vulnerable to bombing a medium tank that can drive away relatively quickly or a Jagdtiger?
Yes this isnt war thunder where large maps would suit the Jagdtiger much better than relatively close combat distances.
This has happened before.
In warthunder King Tigers had to fight the T54 and T10m and it was a shit show.
But youre all for adding the T54 so its more that obvious that you dont mind.
The weak areas of the T-44-100’s turret front is both thinner and larger than the weak areas of the KT’s. The former’s better mobility doesn’t change this aspect especially considering that it can’t effectively shoot back while on the move. In Enlisted, the mobility of tanks is a much less important factor than in War Thunder. While yes in theory the T-44-100’s superior mobility would make it less vulnerable to bombs but in practice, from my experience no tank is mobile enough to save itself from bombs of the size seen in the top tier.
As stated before, the map design and gameplay of Enlisted means that tank on tank flanking just isn’t a viable thing. The vast majority of combat is vehicles slugging it out against each other face to face and the Jadgtiger is very well suited for situation like that. You can’t just point to WT gameplay as justification as it’s very different to Enlisted (and even in that context many a people believe that the King Tigers are oppressively strong compared to other tanks of its BR but that’s not my wheelhouse). Also there definitely are long range maps in this game as well.
As a final note, nowhere in my message did I state that I wanted to add the T-10M or the T-54 1947 into this game.
Is this still a ww2 game or not?
The allies including the Soviets had nothing that could compete in a frontal battle against the king tiger and jagdtiger.
They disposed of them in various other ways which can be done in game as well.
To suggest that mobility is not a factor is incorrect as well.
Why did the world shift to mbts after the war and not produce heavy tanks?
So you would suggest that a turret less tank destroyer has an advantage over a medium tank in a knife fight?
I can use warthunder as justification because the same shift is happening here.
Using balance as justification is add prototype vehicles that will make actual ww2 vehicles obsolete.
Add the t54 then players will want the post war sub caliber rounds that it used.
What role will heavy tanks have then?
I didnt say you suggested the 1947 varient.
I did say you suggested adding the t54.