Asymmetrical balance or mirror gameplay? (poll)

I won’t even answer this

Lmfao they flagged it again.
Hope the mod enjoys looking at something completely within the rules

1 Like

I dont. Why you can flag hidden posts in the first place. His post kept being hidden boys also Offtopic will end up getting Hidden aswell to a certain point.

1 Like

Nah I unhid it adding “Stop the butthurt censorship”
And most likely the same guy flagged it again.

Honestly don’t like this system because it leads to flagging posts you don’t agree with out of pettiness and what not.

First flag still lets you show what the origional post said, and can be restated or removed at a moderators’ discretion.

1 Like

I know, bro

We can see who flagged though and abusing the system can lead to restrictions aswell. The webdevs can take the flag ability away unlike in wt forum))). BACK TO TOPIC NOW! My bad

Have you by any chance considered not calling random people “crying wehraboos” who “ruin games”?

3 Likes

I’m 100% right with that. Look at War Thunder.
Don’t get upset because someone is correct.

Whereas you can get people that main nations that offer decent suggestions without being x-aboos, you also get the most vocal x-aboos that suggest and cry and ruin games.

as JagdEnte had to go, do I now have to ping Elite to clear this out?
Don’t start again lol.

So is that a “no”?

So you guys left some stupid algorithm decide whether or not our post should be flagged

And if you are all asking why I reported Tcat’s poll:

  1. He called my poll awful in his poll which I consider offensive to some extent

  2. He made that poll entirely out of argument with me, he didn’t even ask me if he can make a more detailed version of my poll, he just made it in order to make him look like he’s on a higher level than me

But I guess I’m the bad guy now so congrats

1 Like

Of course.
Take the satisfaction you can get out of that, friend because I know that’s what you’re going for.
Enjoy it :smile:

And to stay on topic, mirror gameplay just leads to stagnation. There’s no fun in it. Having differences between the two factions gives you different playstyles and can help keep things fresh.

I didn’t know I had to ask your permission to make a new thread, oh drama queen.
I tried multiple times to make you adjust your poll by giving suggestions on how to make it not awful, but you just made an exact repeat of your last set of polls:

  • Too limited choice
  • Not objectively worded
  • Too suggestive towards one of the answers

This leads to voter bias, rendering the poll useless to use as a valid metric. And because I think that this poll does pose a good question, I decided it was worth recreating this poll, but fixing the issues stated above.

Doesn’t this sound a bit extreme to you?

Do I now, in your mind, belong to this rather nebulous group?

I agree
like I agreed from the beginning

1 Like

If bullets are based in damage and hitpoints rather than deadliness according to where it strikes.

Asymmetrical play will be a headache and probably eventually lead into a mirror or red vs blue gameplay like it happen in Heroes and Generals.

Infantry weapons are pretty much balance when 1 - 7.92mm or a 1 - 9mm strikes you in the torso or head, they will both take you out of the fight.
So games only have problems when they choose this mixed stance like enlisted did, I prefer asymmetrical balance but maybe is better to go with mirror as it seems the general pursuit of the game.

Assymetrical balance to me means using equipment that isn’t even comparible in the first place.

This whole “this bolt action has slightly more damage while this one is slightly faster” is just meaningless minutia to me.

Exactly dude
I couldn’t have said better myself

Luckily Normandy got released, so I don’t have to play in Moscow anymore
Goodbye Moscow!