That’s ironic for someone who suggested months ago that Moscow should be taken a part for the sole purpose of being a training campaign.
What changed here?
I simply asked to make moscow a training campaign for new player not kill all the campaign progression because i don’t like later level
There is a huge difference and i keep all the automatic weapons only shorted the grind to 24 level
So you support killing campaign progress, so other campaigns can progress. Ok.
Nothing like solving one problem by creating another.
So assaulter spam if fine if someone throws 200$ at gaijin?
It just feels like devs shooting themselves in foot by adding power creep to attract premium sales, and in process ruining campaign by making another full auto spam
I support make a better starter campaign not butcher the game
Scoped Mkb 42(W) was released at the same time as the Premium scoped Gewehr 41. Mkb was sighted at earliest in Leningrad in April 42 (which is why the designation is 42) while the Battle of Moscow ended in January 42.
2 Likes
You mean the Fedorov? I know it’s called the Fedorov Avtomat but you might want to not refer it as Avtomat when this game also has the Avt-40
Yes, they have both words in the guns name, I just happened to use the second.
How does that solve anything though.
Let’s just add price for each bullet so people won’t spam them, brilliant idea, just fucking give f2p knives and let whales hunt at this point
2 Likes
Gewehr 41 wasnt in Moscow either btw.
2 Likes
And? The T-50 was in Leningrad, the BA-11 wasnt in Moscow, the Panzer III B was a rare Poland tank, the Fed is a crap gun scrapped after Winter War, same goes to the AVS and PPD34.
Granatbüchse wasn’t there as well and the F2 too but apparently this is better to prevent Axis from getting slaughtered all the time than giving us a StuG.
And the Mkb35 doesn’t get accurate just because its proto existed before 1941/42. With that logic, the F2 and the Mkb would fit as well as their protos already exists in that timeframe.
2 Likes
Well. I dislike the weird weapon stats right now.
Not even talking faction-wise, but e.g. the P08 Artillery Luger is way more accurate than the MKb/ StG. Thats right. If you put your 0.9 whatever pistol a rifle buttstock, it gains insane amount of accuracy. The Mkb42(W) is somehow more accurate than the (H) despite the (W) being worse irl. The 90 PPD is also the most accurate soviet drum for no reason.
1 Like
With Moscow it was a matter of player progression and new assault weapons. Pacific is a “safe haven” because of terrain. A lot more difficult to ruin that.
The MKb-42 and PZ.IV F2 being added to Moscow was the largest fuck-up in Enlisted history.
2 Likes
I didn’t say that was the solution, I said that was what should have happened. I already proposed solutions in this thread.
I don’t give a damn if those weren’t in Moscow. The point is that these weapons were existing or in service during or by or even before that point in time. Not after. The Mkb entered service after the end of the battle. If you want to have it in Moscow, it should not have been in the progression system as it was a prototype, gold order at best and premium at worst. If you see no issue in this, why not put the AK-47 in Berlin? Call it AK-47 (early) like they did for the MG-42 (early).
F2, G41 and Mkb technically existed in the time frame. Bascially like the Mkb. 35. I don’t see difference between protos not being accepted and protos in testing/ seeking to get approval.
You are just using double standard/ set historical accuracy at a weird logic. Soviet stuff and bad German stuff isn’t worth to mention because tEcHnIcAlLy
1 Like
Because its unfair. Only Soviets should get historical inaccuracies.
2 Likes
Don’t blame the tryhards. Blame the devs for putting them in the campaign.
1 Like
Where is the double standard for saying that prototypes should be gold order or premium, meanwhile weapons actually in service or circulation can be a part of progression if it existed before the end of the battle? Just because i’m using the Mkb as an example, does not mean the standard should only apply to Germans. Just take a moment to actually try to read and understand what i’m proposing rather than looking to disparage something. This isn’t a “Axis OP!” thread, this is a comment on regards to the over-implementation of automatic weapons and over-inclusion within a battle set primarily in 1941. Restrictions can still occur without the removal of said weapons and still having them portrayed in some capacity.