Assaulters killed Moscow

Those are fair, never said or meant to imply that back then there were no issues. It just feels like now any other squad aside from assaulter squads, tanks, scoped Mkb, and Rifleman 2 (grenade launcher) is just asking for it to be destroyed in a matter of seconds

1 Like

Devs should seek to improve their game, not further destroy it by making it feel like a chore or just overall not fun/stressful. If they stuck with a more historical setting and removed those after community backlash, probably wouldn’t be where we are today. I know there are too many SMGs, for both soviets and germans (meanwhile the TOZ-B is useless pretty much). There should have been a Rifleman III before there was a Assaulter IV.

Overall, the games now are just all the Mkb variants, the Suomi, and the grenade launcher rifle. For the soviets, it’s the PPsh and the Avtomat. There’s probably more that I did not notice since I normally play soviets, but I acknowledge those two are just too much and shred without any effort required. T-34 is OP against other tanks but is easily taken out by explosive packs.

1 Like

Seems like your complaints come down to more of general faction balance, when you’re actually playing the faction which grossly overmatches the other in Moscow.

Both mkb and Fedorovs are fun to use.

Avs36 too, same for kirally.

It’s fun. So I do enjoy it.

And no, I m not a tryhard. Just a casual gamer thst do enjoy every weapon ingame.

3 Likes

You didn’t answer which weapon you think I left out. I already stated in posts I think the PPsh and some of the other SMGs are unfair too.

I guess i enjoyed all the gun of the game outiside the first mannichler in stalingrad never used it i simply transfered the second one from normandy

I won’t deny they are fun to use, though whenever a whole team is equipped with endgear equipment and the opposing team is not, it’s not fun for them. I believe there should be a limit or some consequences for bringing out late level equipment like that, maybe a slightly higher reinforcement cost. Trade off being that they are obviously better guns, but if you waste them, they cost more to your teams reinforcements. I think that would be better overall then making the matchmaking set endgame players with only endgame players.

Its fun for us we wasted time for unlock them and buy those gun and so we can use them as our discretion, you want spam them? Ok you can do it, you want use them with moderation? Is ok

Because it’s funny that you are complaining about axis wunderwaffe when you apparently don’t even know about the Soviet equivalent which grossly overmatches them.

I’ve talked about the Avtomat, the PPsh, and other Soviet SMGs. Can you actually form a proper response?

Which will in turn scare off new players because they’d have to sink the hours against endgame players or put money into the game to catch up. You have to go 38 levels before you get to Assaulter IV. What i’m suggesting with the increased reinforcement cost is realistic and makes the player think a bit more strategically.

And? You talk about moscow?

Mp40 got buffed to stg level of powercreep 7.2 damage and 570rof full upgraded

Soviet dont have problem because they start with the ppd from lv1

Bolt-action are similiar,same from Semi-auto,early mg are shit for both side ecc…

Moscow outiside tank is balanced now

So what is wrong with my suggestion of making end gear equipment cost more reinforcement wise? It targets both sides. 3 killed Mkb squads cost more than 3 killed MP40 squads, like 3 killed Avtomat squads cost more than 3 killed PPsh squads.

This

Aka, skilled player wo spam early gear gonna win all invasion aganaist wo spam only end game gear

And where’s the issue in that? I don’t think there’s an issue with people using their brains to think a little more strategically. It seems hard enough to get those people to think to use rally points.

What is the point the get better equipment if is a handicap?

Wy someone gonna play past lv10 if use everything upper that level it mean that is gonna sink his team

Because the equipment is better? Do you know how many people can get killed by a PPsh in 30 seconds compared to any of the Mosins? Hell, the Avtomat is only slightly better, but it is better.

You know you actually sayed what you really want now?

“Remove automatic weapons i dont like them”

“Remove heavy tank i cant kill them”

“Remove good plane and cas outiside biplane is unfair”

Pathetic…

Or, stay with me now, you can actually learn how to read and understand that, what I am saying is, more powerful equipment should cost more to use. You know, instead of misconstruing my point just to insult me.

No thanks i dont need read other excuse for butcher the player progression