Typical forum idiot.
“It doesn’t fit my playstyle so it has to be bad.”
“I love variety (but only for guns I like)”
4 Likes
The AS44 being in the main campaign path is absurd. AS44 never entered service it should only be BP and Prem. Or is thing a change to where we can see some experimental weapons in pathways? Drum SMGs mid campaign for other factions? Heavy IO? Muas? Ratte - E100? German Jets? V3’S? American Nukes? Guns that shoot around corners? Anything is possible or is this just plain old ugly Russian Bias?
3 Likes
Maybe weapons from a year after the battle happened…
Oh yeah, already happened, that’s Moscow Axis
Federov doesn’t make sense in Moscow either so Mkb42 is just an excuse.
1 Like
The Federov is just becoming as magical as Stalinium at this point.
1 Like
Game dev logic:
There is a 25 round gun facing a 30 round gun.
The logical solution is giving the smaller magazine a shorter reload time that is why we make the gun have more damage instead.
1 Like
Fedorov in Moscow makes more sense than panzers in Omaha or Luftwaffe in Berlin…
But hey, gErMaNy SuFfErS
But Mkb, Pz4F2 and MG-42 in Moscow makes as much sense as IS-3 in Berlin, when can I expect the IS-3?
1 Like
Dont forget to add the mighty “Krummlauf”,
shooting around corners sounds like really great gameplay.
Just a game feature, neither American tanks make sense since they aren’t equipped for beach assault and we can’t see any large ship on the beach that could have transported it.
Luftwaffe was flying until the very end of the war. Please fact check before arguing.
Premium, devs always treated premium weapons with certain liberties, early MG42 is not most inaccurate by far.
Well, damaged F1s could have been converted to F2s as early as during Moscow however there is no evidence of this.
As for Mkb42, a gun from the future is countered by a gun from the past which is 100% impossibile since USSR run out of 6.5x50 Arisaka during the Winter War.
Funny that you didn’t even mention early PzIIIs or ZH-29 which surely weren’t present.
The real problem with Moscow that is was designed Red Army centricly and only balanced later on.
Panzer IV F1 could have had heat shells instead of adding F2, Soumi or Mp717r to counter ppsh41.
ZH-29 was only added so Ivan could have avs, early PzIII to balance BT-7 and T-26.
1 Like
Could have added ppd38 with 25mag.
ppsh41 / m38 20mag looking at you.
2 Likes
USSR weapon from the past = unbalanced
USSR prototype weapon = unbalanced
USSR equipment with limited deployment = unbalanced
USSR equipment that had real life issues that are ignored in game = unbalanced
Germany weapons from the past = perfectly balanced
Germany prototype weapon = perfectly balanced
Germany equipment with very limited deployment= perfectly balanced
Germany equipment that had real life issues that are ignored in game = perfectly balanced
Weapons that aren’t even German = perfectly balanced
I mean, want historical matches? I am pretty sure if there was only PPSh vs MP-40 y’all would still be complaining about the PPSh being russian bias, T-34 vs Pz IIIJ the same thing.
Y’all want historical matches or just muh cool equipment to Germany and ignore iconic soviet equipment in name of balance? If ignoring iconic equipment in name of balance y’all wouldn’t like to not have Tigers and King Tigers that are iconic Germany equipment in name of balancing against the Shermans and T-34/85 on the later campaigns.
Edit: Sorry TUSO, I only argue with people that seem to have at least a semblance of good faith and common sense, our several arguments in the past have shown you lack both
Quite sure if the game didnt coat everything with stalinium it would have been more than fine.
3 Likes
You know that the faction is called AXIS and not Wehrmacht?
The AXIS included a lot more nations than just germany…
4 Likes
It kinda is accurate but just wasnt called MG 42 or early MG42 but MG 39/41 for field tests.
1 Like
True , and almost no one talks about this unreal nonsense
Necroposting