Apparently Germany still suffers - mega thread

Does replacing rockets with bombs make you feel unusable?

No. Just comparing fighter-bomber to a strategic/tactical bomber seems like complete lunacy.

6 Likes

high recoil, small magazine loaded from top which blocks your view…
its basically the more annoying version of the Soviet PDD-34.

5 Likes

It can still carry out large-scale bombing and has sufficient flight speed. It can achieve large-scale killing of infantry, and the result is the same. Don’t forget that it did correspond to the P-47 in the past.

Yeah, and one is defenceless brick and the other one is perfectly good fighter plane. Bombs are not everything, shocker!

Same as 20rd Beretta Vs 71rd ppsh. Balanced AF, great argument.

5 Likes

Yes, weaken the P-47, and only Germany can use the JU-188 to bully infantry? And Tiger 2? Do you think the super Pershing has enough killing effect on infantry?

Just like the simulations

9 Likes

cool. now where is their BR5 smg/AR

cause it is plural, there is something other than type hei AR? please tell me.

not really. meteor outmaneuvers it and it has very limited ammo.

lol.
even if ho ri was great tank(which it isnt), japan suffers from shit tanks in low BR.

probably only true thing you wrote.

cherry picking. at low BR you get mostly newbies in MM, so those are players with no vitality and soviet smg also kill them in 2 hits. german smg have advantage only against vitality within 15-20m with their increased damage and body armor negates that. soviet smg can have 50% ROF advantage on same BR (e.g. mp40 vs uragan)

which are actually somewhat balanced against german smg

not even close. p47 is faster, more maneuverable, has better payload and has front facing guns. it is extremely versatile plane. ju188 is one trick pony that cant even defend itself.

4 Likes

Do they still need this?

I didn’t write anything like that. Next time try proper arguments instead of making things up.

Ah yes, typical soviet “but king tiger”. Tbh this is non argument as it was answered like 10^1000 times already and is irrelevant in the discussion.
17493327225594842441771420628698

How is this relevant to you making BS comparisons of weapons that are completely different in how they work?

8 Likes

As someone who does use it, yes.
But even if you have skill issues, you can always stick to Pershing which has even faster reload and more powerful HE than Tiger II.

1 Like

my brother in Christ, that plane is even worse than Soviet Tu-2S.

Okay, please enjoy the loading time.

The actual situation is that Germany will mainly rely on Tiger 2 to kill infantry, while the United States will use P-47. You will only complain that Germany has nothing and never think about what Germany relies on to achieve the same goal.

not even close. tanks die really fast in normal match. even being infamous KT will not save them. p47 has more potential in dealing wide area damage than KT.

ehm, I hope you have deep pockets.

still false, T26 Pershing still reloads faster and has better HE…
So you dont necessarily have to buy the p2w tank.

The cost is lower penetration and almost unprotected body. This is not worth it.

I only complain about you being as dense as depleted uranium, not realising you are making a strawman argument one after another completely ignoring what I write.

Germany Explosive Mass Penetration 0° / 30° / 60° 0% / 50% / 100%
Cannon/Machine Gun Name What uses it? Ammo Type (AP) Velocity TNT Equivalent (g) 10m 100m 500m Ricochet %
90mm M3 M26 M26 T99 APCR (M304 Shot) 1021 0.0 287 / 212 / 67 281 / 208 / 65 259 / 192 / 60 66° / 70° / 72°
90mm M3 M26 M26 T99 APCBC (M82 Shot) 853 137.2 185 / 142 / 65 183 / 140 / 64 173 / 133 / 62 48° / 63° / 71°
88mm KwK 43 Tiger II (P) Tiger II (H) APCBC (PzGr 39/43) 1000 108.8 237 / 180 / 79 234 / 177 / 78 222 / 168 / 75 48° / 63° / 71°

Pershing has better penetration if you use APCR.

You bring this while not noticing that both Germany and Soviets have PPSH obrez but I dont see anyone talking about them or mentioning that they are OP , do you know why?
Because like MAB 1918 they are useless and niche that doesn’t impact the balance while Uragan and PPS does.

What you do here by bringing M1918 is intellectual dishonesty knowing that (Pardon my French) that shit , is shit.

7 Likes