A bunch of nonsense, they have the best submachine guns in BR3, the best rifles, the best jet fighters, and tanks in BR5. The only problem is the lack of attack aircraft, but the cost is reasonable.
- If there were no bulletproof vests, German submachine guns would only need 2 shots to kill enemies, and the FG-42 would be even more powerful in the BR5. Do you think the balance hasnât taken into account bulletproof vests?
- Even without Soviet SMG, you will still encounter American SMG.
- For P47, Germany has JU188, which is similar to the relationship between Super Pershing and Tiger 2.
XD what even is this comparison? At least choose planes of the same class/role like FW190.
6 Likes
Does replacing rockets with bombs make you feel unusable?
No. Just comparing fighter-bomber to a strategic/tactical bomber seems like complete lunacy.
5 Likes
high recoil, small magazine loaded from top which blocks your viewâŚ
its basically the more annoying version of the Soviet PDD-34.
4 Likes
It can still carry out large-scale bombing and has sufficient flight speed. It can achieve large-scale killing of infantry, and the result is the same. Donât forget that it did correspond to the P-47 in the past.
Yeah, and one is defenceless brick and the other one is perfectly good fighter plane. Bombs are not everything, shocker!
Same as 20rd Beretta Vs 71rd ppsh. Balanced AF, great argument.
4 Likes
Yes, weaken the P-47, and only Germany can use the JU-188 to bully infantry? And Tiger 2? Do you think the super Pershing has enough killing effect on infantry?
8 Likes
cool. now where is their BR5 smg/AR
cause it is plural, there is something other than type hei AR? please tell me.
not really. meteor outmaneuvers it and it has very limited ammo.
lol.
even if ho ri was great tank(which it isnt), japan suffers from shit tanks in low BR.
probably only true thing you wrote.
cherry picking. at low BR you get mostly newbies in MM, so those are players with no vitality and soviet smg also kill them in 2 hits. german smg have advantage only against vitality within 15-20m with their increased damage and body armor negates that. soviet smg can have 50% ROF advantage on same BR (e.g. mp40 vs uragan)
which are actually somewhat balanced against german smg
not even close. p47 is faster, more maneuverable, has better payload and has front facing guns. it is extremely versatile plane. ju188 is one trick pony that cant even defend itself.
3 Likes
Do they still need this?
I didnât write anything like that. Next time try proper arguments instead of making things up.
Ah yes, typical soviet âbut king tigerâ. Tbh this is non argument as it was answered like 10^1000 times already and is irrelevant in the discussion.
How is this relevant to you making BS comparisons of weapons that are completely different in how they work?
6 Likes
As someone who does use it, yes.
But even if you have skill issues, you can always stick to Pershing which has even faster reload and more powerful HE than Tiger II.
1 Like
my brother in Christ, that plane is even worse than Soviet Tu-2S.
Okay, please enjoy the loading time.
The actual situation is that Germany will mainly rely on Tiger 2 to kill infantry, while the United States will use P-47. You will only complain that Germany has nothing and never think about what Germany relies on to achieve the same goal.
not even close. tanks die really fast in normal match. even being infamous KT will not save them. p47 has more potential in dealing wide area damage than KT.
ehm, I hope you have deep pockets.
still false, T26 Pershing still reloads faster and has better HEâŚ
So you dont necessarily have to buy the p2w tank.
The cost is lower penetration and almost unprotected body. This is not worth it.