And you do?
Not at BR 1 though. TT Pz3n used to fight BR 1 too.
If BR 1 becomes +/- 0, then bringing TT pz3n back to 2 is fine imo.
1 Like
Whats the hypocrisy?
Soviets at BR2 vs BR1:
Americans at BR2 vs BR1:
You think itās fair because you took one German tank to BR3?
1 Like
So? We were all there once.
And the Soviets and the allies keep oppressing the poor Germans and the Japanese and Soviets with their body armor and nonsense machine guns and Americans with lots of machine guns on their tanks and a flamethrower.
1 Like
Who for magical reasons cannot engage a Panzer III with a tank but are somehow skilled enough to snipe them from the side with ATRs after flanking.
Makes sense.
So why is the Panzer III M still BR2? According to you, that sideskirts make it āimpossibleā to counter, ignoring your P2W/ ārarityā and āless powerfull cannonā argument. It still spams HE and MG bullets that can sealclub plebsā¦ excluding for these skilless BR1 newbie-flankers.
Very straightforward.
1 means basically P2W.
2 still doesnt prevent people from slaughter infantry with HE and MG while being āinvulnerableā.
Plus
is also good argument. So put Premium Jumbo in BR3 since its very rare compared to TT Jumbo.
1 Like
When you already have the Pz.4H that can penetrate the KV-1 body and turret, yet still demand that the KV-1 be placed on the BR4, I really canāt bear it anymore.
Germany needs better BR2 submachine guns, and I think the proposal of buff FNAB-43 is great, but it doesnāt mean you can roar without a bottom line to destroy the Allies.
2 Likes
Iām currently working on a massive rebalance for all factions based on historical figures. And surprisingly, a lot of guns come out better.
No, it doesnāt.
Overperforming BR2 smgs needs to go back to BR3.
7 Likes
Donāt forget that Germany still has the M1918 in the BR2, which is a submachine gun with a firing rate of 1040, although it only has a 21 round magazine.Bring the MP40 along with it so that I can handle various situations.
I donāt think newbie should work on āmassive rebalanceā.
1 Like
It can but doesnāt mean it will every time as KV-1 turret and hull armor is really bouncy and few degrees angle and itās a ricochet while pz4h is made of paper itās huge turret has BR1 armor (50mm) and hull is also weak (80mm). You can angle your hull but against no armor around your turret you canāt do anything.
1 Like
trash smg with dreadful sights, low mag size and unplayable recoil at anything but ultra close distance while soviets have overpowered PPS-42/43 + Uragan with all three being superior
it can barely handle Sten 2 of BR1 lmao and you want pretty much force it to fight vs Soviet BR3 smgs
1 Like
This will not be harder than destroying Tiger 2 with IS-2 (1944), throwing KV-1 onto BR4 is absolutely absurd. Of course, I am not opposed to adding some better tanks to Germany.
2 Likes
Bringing them all with you is definitely a solution.
At least IS-2 once pens Tiger it always murder it in a single hit, while PZ4H can only guarantee destruction against pixels on itās turret cheeks as hull is too bouncy and most of the time itās just a fuel hit which means KV-1 will retaliate and kill you in a single hit against any part of your non existent armor. KV-1 at BR4 would be useless i can agree with you, Germany should get something with better armor but weaker turret than of Panther at BR3 instead.
Bring them all into the garbage bin and go play BR3/5 instead. BR2 Germany = bot and newbie land
Be clear, 80mm armor is difficult to penetrate in BR3.
1 Like
The Stu G with tracks is actually a very suitable tank to deal with KV-1. It does not have a turret, but can easily destroy KV-1.However, KV-1 requires careful targeting of areas without tracks, which is actually fair, but obviously, it requires you to spend money.
Once again, it should be reiterated that the 75mm cannon can penetrate most of the KV-1 area, but there are some fragmented areas that cannot be penetrated.
Additionally, having tanks similar to Panther on the BR3 is completely ridiculous.
1 Like