You’re talking about BR 1 players. They are the least equipped to deal with anything in the game, let alone a constant presence of seal clubbers sitting in their 3ns.
Their infantry AT weapons should have a fair chance against the infantry deletion machine.
If we ever get BR 1 +/- 0, then bringing TT pz3n back down to br 2 is fine in my opinion.
I assume it’s quite straightforward:
TT needs to be balanced better than premiums. You’d use to see at least 1 pz3n in almost every match, 3M is much more rare.
And the Soviets and the allies keep oppressing the poor Germans and the Japanese and Soviets with their body armor and nonsense machine guns and Americans with lots of machine guns on their tanks and a flamethrower.
Who for magical reasons cannot engage a Panzer III with a tank but are somehow skilled enough to snipe them from the side with ATRs after flanking.
Makes sense.
So why is the Panzer III M still BR2? According to you, that sideskirts make it “impossible” to counter, ignoring your P2W/ “rarity” and “less powerfull cannon” argument. It still spams HE and MG bullets that can sealclub plebs… excluding for these skilless BR1 newbie-flankers.
Very straightforward.
1 means basically P2W.
2 still doesnt prevent people from slaughter infantry with HE and MG while being “invulnerable”.
Plus
is also good argument. So put Premium Jumbo in BR3 since its very rare compared to TT Jumbo.
When you already have the Pz.4H that can penetrate the KV-1 body and turret, yet still demand that the KV-1 be placed on the BR4, I really can’t bear it anymore.
Germany needs better BR2 submachine guns, and I think the proposal of buff FNAB-43 is great, but it doesn’t mean you can roar without a bottom line to destroy the Allies.
Don’t forget that Germany still has the M1918 in the BR2, which is a submachine gun with a firing rate of 1040, although it only has a 21 round magazine.Bring the MP40 along with it so that I can handle various situations.
It can but doesn’t mean it will every time as KV-1 turret and hull armor is really bouncy and few degrees angle and it’s a ricochet while pz4h is made of paper it’s huge turret has BR1 armor (50mm) and hull is also weak (80mm). You can angle your hull but against no armor around your turret you can’t do anything.
trash smg with dreadful sights, low mag size and unplayable recoil at anything but ultra close distance while soviets have overpowered PPS-42/43 + Uragan with all three being superior
it can barely handle Sten 2 of BR1 lmao and you want pretty much force it to fight vs Soviet BR3 smgs
This will not be harder than destroying Tiger 2 with IS-2 (1944), throwing KV-1 onto BR4 is absolutely absurd. Of course, I am not opposed to adding some better tanks to Germany.
