AI SHOULD BE REMOVED! from infantry at least

[XxNelsonSHxX]

Tbf I actually prefer AI temmates over those piece of shite worse than bots players that don’t build Rallies, never olay objectives and hog vehicle slot doing nothing for the entire match

[Ron_McKracker]

@Mete_HAN31584

I believe that artificial intelligence (AI) should not be used in infantry, as it is currently not effective. The AI is unable to accurately target enemies that AI soldiers are not aware of in combat situations and are standing still like toys, making it useless. Unless the AI is improved, similar to the AI used in games such as Ready or Not or Splinter Cell, it should be removed from use. Otherwise, it may lead to the enemy discovering your location. Additionally, when pressing ‘x’ to have the AI remain at a specific location, they may follow you if you move too far away due to the distance parameter which is annoying.

This game has great potential. Let’s not ruin it and work on improving it.

@Mete_HAN31584

I might have been misunderstood in the beginning. I said it should be removed until it’s improved like the points in your reply are added and covered. Other than that, I agree with you.

Let’s think logically here for a moment.

If AI is TEMPORARILY REMOVED, what does this force the devs to focus on besides new content (they don’t care about maps )? THE INDIVIDUAL PLAYER EXPERIENCE.

This means more focus on camera movement when sprinting and running to make it look like your characters are actually running. More freedom in movement, like diving for cover (not like COD, where you can constantly drop-shot people).

It increases focus on the devs to fix gun sights and cycling animations for straight pulls, lever actions, and even some regular bolt action rifles.

This means more focus on more means of communication, allowing for better teamwork and better organization.

There are more neglected aspects of the individual player’s experience, but my point is clear. The developers are not good at multitasking, so let’s focus on one thing at a time. Since the players and not AI buy the products they sell, the focus should be on where the money is coming from.

After they are finished with the essential individual player experience (ready for Steam), they go balls to the wall on AI. They can use test servers for the AI, and players will be encouraged with unique in-game gifts. They will have room to breathe, and this game will be on Steam before 2026.

Remember, Napoleon’s mistake at Waterloo was that he didn’t focus on completely destroying the Prussian force. The same force that was not destroyed would end up coming up on Napoleon’s right flank, causing Napoleon to be surrounded and forcing him to surrender. DON’T BE NAPOLEON.

[Ron_McKracker]

@Kriegerfaust007

what AI in any game ever has had that level of intelligence

Call to Arms - Gates of Hell: Ostfront

Arma

Insurgency Sandstorm

[Ron_McKracker]

Of course, if they intertwined the code for it, this just goes out the window, and they are in this pain gauntlet forever.

[Derekcreeperer]

What u are basically suggesting is to remove enlisted from enlisted…lol