Absolutely. I’m not denying that. But still, the KT will have better armor than the T44.
Id say most if not all even remotely competent tankers remains little bit outside of range of hand held at weapons so in general this “advantage” is like GE having sniper stg44 and soviets can have bayonet for sniper mosin.
Honestly, I didn’t get the joke.
Soviet prototype tank must fight with German prototype tank to be fair
I don’t know why it’s not clear to you.
Ohh weapons that did see combat in WW2 although the only “new” thing are the sights. But they are authentic unlike the Allied and Soviet prototypes.
So don’t complain if Germany also receives PROTOTYPES in its TT like E-75,100,P.1101,TA 183, Panzerfaust 250,Cönders MG etc.
It is quite pointless advantage in comparison.
Just like stg44 scope vs scoped mosin with bayonet ← Bayonet being the “advantage” in this comparison.
You really don’t want to understand the issue of balance.
They’re all unnecessary, but the Conders? Well, if the developers really don’t want to give Germany a Finnish SMG, something like this could be suitable.
Almost nothing can penetrate the Tiger 2’s hull, and almost the only way to penetrate it is the turret. So this is a significant advantage.
Hell No to all of them, none belongs in Enlisted.
Panther F is a maybe could be added. the other absolutely not.
As for jap Tiger shouldn’t have been added to game to begin with, then secondly no it’s not a BR5 tank, not at all to be compared to KT or IS-2 or Super Pershing.
I mean this Cönders MG not the MP from the game
It is NOT NECESSARY to continue with that rule because the game is going to BREAK more than it is
An advantage like the versatility of the Allied planes as opposed to the German ones,Each faction has strengths and weaknesses.
It’s a shame that she HAD the 50kg ones for a long time and she still has them…
So basically an LMG? I’m a fan of them! I’ll be happy with any LMG added to the game.
You and I will never reach a conclusion on the issue of balance. I think we’ve had this discussion about twice before. So it’s better not to continue.
If you are talking about P47, i believe this plane is not very powerful, just a matter of ease of use of rockets for noob players. While bombs require skill. And if you are talking about Meteor. Yes, it should be nerfed. Not just Meteor, all jets. I believe their bombs should be removed.
dunno did try T-34-100 and it sure did pen it
Which about 99% of time is the thing visible of the tank and the spot you are aiming.
Quite hard to imagine situation where I can hide the turret.
Are we playing the same game? Soviets are completely superior to Germany in every single way outside of a tanks at BR5.
- Fedorov Rifle/MG/Avtomat = Better than anything that Germany has
- AS-44 = Straight upgrade to STG44 (bayonet and minor stats all upgraded)
- RD-44 = Best TT lmg in the game
- AVT-40 20 = better than FG42 II as you don’t miss as much due less rof
- PPSh-41 drum = Best TT smg in the game
- RMN-50 = Usable even at BR5, and since grenade rifle nerfs it’s only nade launcher that can consistently still murder groups of the enemies
- LAD = not a single German smg can have 150 rounds
- NKVD Tommies = Conders but much stronger dmg
- AT-44 = After a buff it’s the best mid range AR in the game perfect accuracy with above average rof
- Body armor: Ever dreamed of cosplaying Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles? Then here we go! We have also provided handy bonus of +10% bullet protection and 1% chance of ricochet and negating all damage.
- Su-9 = Better flight and anti air performance than me262
- 2x Paratroopers = Can hold 6x Fedorovs or AS-44 + RD-44 x3 from the box
- Soviet Assault engineers = 6x Fedorovs (Ass engies are nothing special as Germany has them but Germany has not a single equivalent of buffed Fedorov)
- La-7 = Really solid plane with great turn rate
3 Likes
If we really want to be history accurate , we should have 30 soviet players playing against 10 germany players in the Battle of Berlin.
I personally have no objections, of course, I will only play at the soviet side 
Definitely the Soviet Union is more advantageous for infantry, but there are some modifications to be made.
Honestly, it’s SF meta, so if play peak, won’t have to use AR.
There’s definitely no reason to use sub-machine guns.
Honestly, the problem is that SF is too powerful.
Personally, I think FG2 is better than AVT 20 because of the difference in ROF.
RMN-50 is definitely a planet-destroying weapon wwww
Bulletproof clothes are a great advantage
But the Soviet weakness is the absence of Ofenrohr
The absence of the T-44-100.
The Su-9 honestly, I think Me262 is better than the Su-9.
They solved the fuel problem, but the turn time of the Su-9 is the worst of all jets, and strangely, the turn is not as good as the catalog. (It was terrible before the fuel problem was solved.)
Oddly enough to destroy a tank with Su-9 cannon, it was more difficult to than Kikka cannon, and the infantry killing power is overwhelmingly good on Me262.
Oh, one last thing,
There is also the absence of a BR5 Bomber to counter the Fw 190 D-12.
Tu-2S is the Ju 188 A-2 equal, not the Fw 190 D-12
GE Ace pilots use Fw 190 D-12 to fight P-47D-28
The Me262 had infantry and enemy planes, the Kikka had infantry and tanks and planes (high difficulty because 100 rounds), and the Meteor had very easy control and two Bombs,
Strangely, the Su-9 doesn’t performance as well as the catalog spac.
I don’t know why.
One thing’s for sure, I think it’s the weakest of the TT jets
This one line is enough to make me ignore this entire message.
That armor offers very good resistance against the Panzerfaust, many spots on the hull are not punctured. Also, speed is not a big advantage on our maps.
T44 did not appear on the frontline battlefield, and the topic is over. Can the fanatics of the Soviet Union please return to the Chinese internet and stop embarrassing themselves