I’m sorry, but there’s an error in that word.
We were asking for a T-44-100 that can deal equally with KTH and Ho-Ri, but the E-75 you mentioned is a stronger tank than Ho-Ri.
It’s a tank that should come with it later when it gives the equivalent to other factions.
I’m a player of all factions, and I’m looking for balance. Right now in BR5 almost everything is balanced between Soviet and German. But the Soviet tank is significantly worse (due to the terrible reload time). So I agree with adding the T44 100. If you want talk about the body armor, I have a thread about removing its effect and I believe that all decorative items, including helmets, should be just decorative. Also, Germany has a lot of fake equipment. Equipment that never saw the battlefield, such as the MKB 35, MKB 42m, MG39, etc. So I see no reason not to add something that is necessary for balance to the game. Especially since this tank was made, while something like the HO RI in japan that was added for balance was not even made!
Things like the E-75 only make things worse and pave the way for things like the IS3 to be added.
3 Likes
Reread my comment, I said that. Name me 2 heavy machines, for Japan, equal to German, American, and Soviet machines. The USSR had a whole line of tanks. which would be “heavy” for the Japanese, but for the United States and the Third Reich it would be the same. The Japanese literally have a tank backbone, which is Che-he, Chi-nu against Sherman, T 34-85. And comparing a nation with no comparable analogues at all, that’s why they were given paper- you’re appealing to a weak nation to strengthen it… strong ones? Are you kidding me?
event, vet box’s ?
Wasnt the t-34-100 available for event as well ?
Perhaps in box too.
Honestly, the IS3 gun itself is 122mm, which is still bad, but the armor are huge, so it’s a more serious tank than Ho-Ri.
If it comes out, maybe KT with 105mm or Maus should come out.
But honestly, I don’t want it to come out.
The tank can never be breached with an infantry weapon.
I wouldn’t call Ho-Ri weak. And Chi-Ri 2 isn’t the worst tank either. IN ADDICTION, 've been favoring the addition of O-I to the Japanese TT for a long time… We’re talking about top tanks, aren’t we?
Right.
BR5 Soviet’s only hope tank.
It’s a glass cannon, so it’s hard to have an equal match and too few people have it because it’s event tank.
Well, he said somewhere that fake equipment shouldn’t even be an event. (Of course, it’s not like there aren’t any fake things in German TT. As far as I can remember, I read somewhere that the STG snipers were never used on the front lines. They were not very accurate and the scope needed to be readjusted after a few shots. And the pictures on the internet of them in the hands of soldiers are from the testing grounds, but we have them in TT, Also, I don’t think things like the MG81 were really on the front lines. And things like the beretta 1918 and the OVP were not present in WWII as far as I know.)
And about the T34 100, it’s a good tank. But it still has too weak armor and the Soviets need a decent 100mm tank in TT.
I believe the same, which is why I believe adding a tank like the E-75 or anything stronger than the HO RI and KT is a big mistake.
If such tanks come out, the hill Tiger of D-Day in the past could be re-emerged.
It was really horrible back then…
It was absolutely impossible to destroy with infantry, US tanks were shit, and it was only possible to destroy by plane, which was a disaster then.
1 Like
Just had to try out and apparently the IS-2 was more than capable to single shot KT2.
Sure I admit it has super long reload time.
Dunno ? First thing that comes in my mind is mkb / stg scoped that at most was tested.
Other than that cant really figure any other “fake TT” stuff that has any use.
Shall we also introduce the shortcomings of AVS / AVT ?
Which all could be removed for all I care, are we also removing Ak47, sovjet jet, fedorov is bit of stretch but why the fk not.
The armor is relatively meaningless when you die to 1 hit, which IS2 for example is more than capable of.
T34 however is alot faster than either KT or IS and still has the punch to go thru almost anywhere of KT.
Kinda like the soviet bodyarmor hardly makes differency in game of current FG42’s
The problem is that there is a high risk of failure to destroy the tank.
Both sides can make a mistake in destroying it at the same time, and if both failed at the same time, the next priority is on KTH as many as two more times.
Not to mention, on average, the 88mm of KTH is better at killing infantry.
A 122mm power is good, but the overall killing infantry is reduced due to the loading speed.
100mm can have the advantages of both thanks to good penetration and moderate loading speed.
That’s why 100mm really has to be added to TT.
I wasn’t looking to nerf it. I just wanted to prove why they weren’t used in combat and are fake.
I wasn’t looking to remove anything. The game system is currently designed for balance. If we were to remove all the fake stuff, we would have to go back to the campaign era.
Armor has a significant impact in different situations, I’m not trying to start this discussion with you, which is quite obvious. (Just for example, a Panzerfaust shot at almost anywhere in front of a T 34 85 will penetrate it, but you have to aim for KT.)
I believe its effect should be removed and I even have a thread about it.
There is no mistake why T-44 100 PROTOTYPE is going to fight against E-75 also PROTOTYPE so its incorporation is valid
Balance that is not there in this game and there shouldn’t be because it is slowly breaking down due to prototypes
Battle Pass weapon, Event, but they are not in TT But the same can be said of the T20, AS-44, T-44, Hyde 1944, RPD etc.
Adding Hori also has its consequences like the post-war SU-46 and possible T-44 100
1 Like
As also in those times with the Allied Bombings OH I hope it STILL happens constantly…
I doubt the KT2 can just randomly shoot everywhere in contrast.
Has to aim the shot just like IS2.
The dshk seems to chew infantry rather well and regardless the 122 reloads slower I doubt its HE is less powerful than 88
So faster than KT, better killing inf than KT and just as capable to OHK KT as IS2
So where exactly is the balance here ?
The differency here is that the above mentioned GE “fakes” has quite niche use.
While the AK / Fedorovs are pretty much meta.
Aka, you can remove the GE “fakes” today and it has pretty much 0 impact towards overall balance.
While cant really say the same about soviets.
So does the speed.
At that time, if GE had decided and had Ace Air Force, there was nothing the US could do.
Are you aware of that as well?
BF 109 G-6 (250kg) or Fw 190 A-8 (2 Big Rocket),
BF 110 G-2 (37mm cannon and 4 Big Rocket), Ju 188 A-2 (250kg x 6)
The German Air Force at that time was also formidable.
The U.S. forces at the time were P-38 and P-51D
We had an A-20 and a P-47D.
The P-47D was a little more powerful, but it wasn’t too bad to fight.
BF 109 with 4 bombs of 50kg that did NOTHING damage, a FW 190 with only 2 Rockets was not striking to use them unlike the Panzer IV, Panther and Tiger 1,JU 188 a good Bomber and the BF 110 G-2 good ground attack But they were unprotected by not having a competent fighter to protect them
There were options to give Germany something affordable, but the developers didn’t do it.
ALL COMPETENT when it comes to Spamming M8, RP3, HVAR, 1000lb, 500lb, 250lb and 100lb And also with good aerial combat and speed
I’m sorry, but it was very late that it changed to 50kg x 4 pieces.
At that time, it was 250kg.
Honestly, it’s time to roll back to 250kg.
It’s about power, not being a prototype. If you don’t want to understand that, I have nothing to say to you.
Sniper STG, Sniper MKB and…
When the campaign system was removed, everything was clear. Now the main issue is balance.
2 Likes