Br5 tank of ussr have not updated for 2 years,Japanese got their new br5 tank tiger just in this month.So,new br5 tank for ussr ,usa and germany may be necessary and helpful. TigerIIH had been the best tank of this game until the Type 5 Ho-Ri joined enlisted,so usa and ussr need new Br5 tank to fight it,also,Germany should get a new powerful Br5 tank ,add t44100,panther f and t26e5 may be a good choice
8 Likes
The Japanese Tiger is BR4 tank in BR5, Super Pershing is already very good against the Tiger II H, Panther F I don’t see a problem in being added, T-44 100 is necessary
Panther F is already in the game files
9 Likes
Okay a few things, the Super Pershing is more than enough for the US.
The KTH is getting a speed decrease soon, so that will be slightly more balanced.
The Panther F isnt a BR5 tank imo.
As for the entire T-44 series, thats a bit more complicated, the T-44-100 could come as a rare event vehicle I think, however the TT version should be the standard T-44, since that did at least see WW2 service, being equipped to many units in a training element in 1944, reportedly seeing some action around Berlin, but certainly at least a few saw combat later on in the later Manchurian campaign.
1 Like
yea, ignoring HA for one second - those two vehicles would be very healthy for the game play - less OP armor, but faster general purpose good tanks compared to IS2 and Tiger II H.
3 Likes
It is really a BR5 tank, since it retains the Tiger E turret but has a H1 hull, which in game at least, justifies it as a BR5 vehicle.
Not necessary Id argue, but it wouldnt go amiss. Especially as an event vehicle.
2 Likes
Tiger E is in my mind still worse than Panther, so BR5 makes no sense in my mind.
1 Like
T-44-100 must be added to TT unconditionally.
However, Panther F is not bad, but it doesn’t have any advantages compared to G, so I didn’t feel the need to add it.
In the case of T26E5, the lack of penetration can never replace T26E1-1 in the end.
2 Likes
The main problem being, the Tiger E is practically immune to all BR3 tanks except the M10. (Frontally at least, and technically you can pixel hunt to kill it, but thats getting into semantics at this point)
2 Likes
It must be added as TT, not as an event.
This is because it can compete equally against KT 2H and Ho-Ri.
1 Like
Honestly, the problem is not Tiger’s problem, it’s caused by the lack of APCR in Sherman.
We need to add APCR to the BR3 tanks.
But it still has 162mm penetration and it’s very annoying to penetrate Jumbo, Pershing and Super Pershing and Japan BR4 doesn’t face USA BR3 so it would probably only play against BR5 anyway
I agree, T-44 in TT and T-44 100 as event tank
1 Like
T44 100 is definitely necessary. It should be TT. T26E5? I don’t think it would change anything. I don’t see a problem with the Panther either.
1 Like
The T44 doesn’t change anything. The Soviets need a 100mm version, the T44 100 in TT.
2 Likes
85mm is really useless.
All we need is 100mm.
Only 100mm, not 85mm or 122mm, can solve the Soviet tank fire problem.
7 Likes
Honestly, the problem is that it’s harder to fight with Ho-Ri than KTH. ww
No matter how much had nothing else to give, it’s too powerful
This machine was removed, because it did not fight in Berlin. At the time of testing, it was instead of the Panther G, but then it was removed. T 44 is paper, it did not fight at the front, at all.
1 Like
Honestly, there’s no reason to use a G because there’s no upper machine gun.
The most important thing in the game is balance rather than proof.
Because of that, the game has been ruined in the past, so they changed direction.
How long will BR5 Soviet leave no one using the tank?
85mm is useless against KTH, 122mm can’t fight equally, so very few people ride IS-2. (or nobody)
We’ll even have to fight with Japan in the future, what are you going to fight with Ho-Ri?
1 Like
I thought the T-44’s penetration was too much Lol, both can be TT
1 Like
The point is, “use it or don’t use it.” Panther F didn’t fight in Berlin, so it was written off.
Balance is a subjective concept, and 6 is not an accurate data. In life, some people are strong and some are weak. Some people are smart and some are stupid. Some people are white and some are black, and so on. The T 44 did not fight, and if it had not been popularized in War Thunder, it would have been forgotten like dozens of other tanks. Furthermore, the IS 2 is an equal enemy to the King Tiger, and it is a historical enemy. Can the IS 2 kill the King Tiger? Yes. What’s the problem? Reloading the gun. The solution? Faster recharge- no more problems. The introduction of new machines, paper machines, will require them for the Third Reich. Löwe will go, E series, TIGER 105 and others will go. They also did not fight, but if vehicles are rolled out against a tank that did not fight, but were simply created (even if in the rear, as a prototype, or even after the war), then prototypes will go. Next, Japan. Tell me about mass-produced tanks comparable to the IS 2, the SUPER Pershing, or the King Tiger in Japan. I’ll just remind you that while the Germans, the Soviets, and the United States had mass-produced heavy tanks, the Japanese did not.
3 Likes
That’s why have Ho-Ri.
Honestly, this is a Paper Tank itself, but there are no real ones or tanks that can compete similarly to other tanks.
So it’s the only tank close to BR6, but I can’t really complain about it.