American Body Armor
Spoiler
British Body Armor
Spoiler
Japanese Body Armor
I am unaware of any body armor the Germans or Italians used. If anyone has any information on this matter, feel free to comment.
9 Likes
body armor needs to reduce total stamina or reduce sprint speed like a LMG, wearing a massive steel plate on your body for free damage resist is absurd
19 Likes
WW1 French Daigre Armor - Uniforms, Belts and Buckles - Treasure Bunker Forum’
Perhaps French WW1 armor that would be a little less obsolete than Germans own WW1 lobster armor?
2 Likes
i would rather that they remove body armor from soviets. or at least its damage reduction effect.
cosmetics should stay cosmetics and should have no practical effect in the game.
12 Likes
No
If this stops these sorts of post from coming up, I agree, remove it. The cope for supposed “OP” soviet body armor is just tiresome at this point.
1 Like
Just remove the 10% buff off soviet body armor. This suggestion, while interesting, I’m afraid could lead to the fortnite-fication of Enlisted
4 Likes
in fact,I want more buildings for engies,yes I want more fortification,lesss fucking zerg rushers who end game in minutes and dint give a chance to atackers noe defenders to earn enough xp because a bunch of retards who are hiper competitive wish run the fun of others
noo, the fortnine-fication of games like what happened in COD
dude just look the models who exist in game,add some of them would be nice and wouldn’t be OP, and just look the mod Big Action mode for show you its a must
it seems i didnt communicate what i meant clearly, i’m afraid the addition of a very niche and obscure armor in this game would lead to a slippery slope where DF decided its cool to put make believe shit in game like those in COD and the PACA body armor in BF 5. Soviet armors are widely known and should be okay to be in game, 10% reduction doesnt seems very OP at all but if it calm german players then we can always make the armor pure cosmetics with no buff whatsoever
1 Like
Bring this to the game and body armor wont hurt,game already its hurt due constant spam of vehicles due whales
Even if they dont have one they might just decide that a thick coat might aswell qualify as armored just like some officer caps ingame already are.
But somehow the japanese helmets are not so there already is no consistancy in what is armored and what not.
The Japanese also had a variety of armoured steel bibs, some covered with fabric and others just steel. Along with some other armoured vests that sort of had small metal plates all over like scales too.
They even played around with this wacky backpack style armour from 1938-1940 that was like a metal shell on the back of soldiers.
1 Like
I guess this crying could be happen if even that resist was only 1%… BECAUSE 1 FREE %. IT"S A LOT. GERMANY SUFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFER! DELETE IT. OR GIVE TO GERMANY IT TOOOOOOO.
1 Like
Well no, nobody would care about the bodyarmor if it was not for how many of the used weapons where affected by it. If you need an additional bullet to kill then it does make a diffrence. If MP 40 and FG needs another bullet to kill just because someone is wearing armor people would not care for the damage reduction and how it is implemented.
It’s not affect current gameplay in enlisted.
Idk in which game you play.
And for that being useful at least a bit you had to put this shit on everyone to the last.
Also put perk on vitality on them too.
And then on some narrow medium distance you will be take 1 bullet more before die…
Imo. It’s thing for braindead meta players and braindead meta haters. Not real game changer.
How is 2 shot into a 3 shot at CQC range " not affecting the gameplay" ?
Or even worse 1 shot into a 2 shot ? In the later case if makes you 100% more resistant in turn making semi auto fire useless.
Source
Source
Show me your source.
Keep the thread on-topic and the conversation civil and respectful. If you want to fight amongst yourselves, do it in the PM system, not the forum.
1 Like