Not sure which message you mean exactly, could you link it so I can give an accurate response?
Well maybe the devs should spend their time more efficiently in that case. This game has been in development for what 6, 7 years now? Their progress is really slow, which is why they probably have a debt they are trying to pay off by monetizing this heavily.
No, they are a common game-killing occurrence. There are plenty of ways to monetize this game without resorting to the P2W stuff they are going for now.
Do have to say this one response was uncalled for.
1 Like
Not a hyperbole, adding too many microtransactions can and does kill games. Iāve watched and played several games that added MT after MT and the playerbase just left. The game essentially killed itself.
That is something I do not want to see here. Iām aware game development is expensive, my work involves that field to a degree among other things, Iām aware how much they cost even, but there is a right way to go about it, and a wrong way.
Locking half the game behind monetization is the wrong way. This one kills games, and itās pretty common.
How big is the studio?
Dust 514, the game I always compare enlisted to, always had a small studio in comparison to the rest of CCP, then a bunch of them got laid off to slow development even more before the studio and the game shuttered.
That game had what I considered the perfectly-fair payment model (doesnāt fit with Enlistedās mechanics unfortunately), but clearly it didnāt make enough money.
~30 across CR and En, as far as I could find.
I have read all those, and yes those might be stupid but he has right to suggest thoseā¦ if you dont like those why read them at all? Devs are not going to implemet some premium fuel cause someone suggested that on forum.
Also i read this what i think is somehow related to said person
https://forum.enlisted.net/t/monetization/5087
But mayby i misunderstoodā¦
Like you said āAnd how am I supposed to act politely around this guy?ā
Im thinking how im supposed to respect those who participate to āwitch huntā
ofcourse it dosent matter or no one cares if i respect someone or notā¦
I really hope they dont only wipe game servers but this forum as well. When new players tomorrow come here seeking advice/tips/whatever and they realise this place is mostly sour ****hole they wont ever come back
1 Like
To make sure they donāt get implemented.
People suggested mines. Other people had concerns about it. Didnāt stop devs from implementing.
Mines are pretty ārealisticā suggestion to ww 2 game. Premium gasoline with gold is not
1 Like
People were rather worried about their cheesiness and potential mine spam (that could be horrible with AI running all around and detonating AP mines by accident). I tolerate AT mines and Iām still not sure how AP ones will play out but devs stated that they will not be any possibility to spam them (I hope so)
yep AP mines might be problematic but hopefully changes to inventary those are not really spammable
Pretty sure I know who this is referring to.
Whether you guys think an idea is bad or not, doesnāt mean we should be censoring stuff that isnāt a popular opinion. Weāre not Reddit.
4 Likes
post isnt up 9hrs and the same people are still brigading my posts because I disagree with them.
2 Likes
i dont report people but i will tell them they have shitty ideas.
1 Like
I have a strict policy of only reporting the people who abuse reporting. Especially when they announce theyāre abusing reporting.
The argument used to be against P2W items/suggestions.
Objecting the Premium account access to stuff because that counts as ārentingā is a whole new ballgame.
Right - gotcha - goalposts movedā¦
lmfao
Yeah that fits
1 Like
No need to flame over some miscommunication / distraction stuff that he didnāt actually cause. That one was on me.
1 Like
āflameā
I asked an innocent question is all
You know what I mean
If not, PM me so we donāt derail the topic further
1 Like