Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a F2P advocate, I’m down for getting small advantages here and there for supporting the game financially. I’d expect small stuff here and there.
But holy f*** the suggestions that dude has makes me uncomfortable as hell. I could pay for them fairly easily but I don’t want to have that kind of advantage, it’s too much. I’d rather quit.
With realistic optics it won’t be an issue like it is in War Thunder with 3rd person and aiming out of your barrel.
If you block your view ports you can’t see in Enlisted.
Can’t access it
It’s basically saying we should be able to change the finish on the weapon, brand new, battle worn, rusty, etc, weapon skins basically. But only available to premium users, F2P users would be blocked from it.
It was not received well to say the least. You can guess who made the suggestion.
I still don’t understand why can’t I access it
But thanks anyways
Did you get the access to enlisted monetization?
If yes, log out of your account and back in, then it’ll work.
So proof of forum harassment even though it’s purely cosmetic
Not really.
People gave him decent responses why it’s a bad idea and would not be good here.
People disagree with him because even if it’s just cosmetic, you will have to pay premium account like rent just to have that
Why not just make it sellable for Gold and not Prem account?
Camo condition is tied to your premium account in War Thunder, isn’t this the same thing?
And it’s an overall extremely hated function that most people want gone or made accessible to F2P.
Why should we add this here? Do we want more reasons to hate the premium account? Pretty sure we have enough with the +1 infantry/vehicle slots.
Do I have to say it 10000000 times?
ENLISTED IS NOT WARTHUNDER
Plus Warthunder is already a hated game
My point is it’s not justification to go on a crusade against a player who wants the game to be sustainable.
This right here. This is the problem. This is where you are horribly wrong.
All of those functions were introduced when WT already had a pretty sizeable playerbase, a lot of people quit over that thing and many others, but it was fine, they still had enough left.
This is a CBT game, and there are alternatives to it. WT is one of a kind.
The more you f*** up here with monetization, the chance of the game being DOA grows immensely. Enlisted is not one of a kind. There are other games like it that can be played if someone doesn’t like it.
The type of shit WT is doing, it only works because THERE IS NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE TO IT.
We need to be VERY careful how we got about monetizing this so it remains active and sustainable instead of shut down in 6 months.
Neat, but it’s the same train of thought
I mean bro, I rather eat shit getting sniped from 50 yards away from a enemy bot through the bushes with a semi auto weapon on Normandy than pay for an advantage. Because bruh, if this game was a paid game instead like HLL or RO2, battle pass stuff would be out the window.
And as ghost and I say- development costs money so you need to find the balance people will pay for.
And introducing P2W mechanics that will prompt the majority of the playerbase to quit and go to another similar game achieves that how exactly?
Drop the hyperbole, microtransactions aren’t some rare game-killing occurrence.