enlisted was different from cod, medal of Honor and Battlefield. if it loses historical accuracy it’s worth playing Battlefield or cod, in many ways they’re better
8 Likes
being third when most of the other players just sucked? and tell me how many kills would you had if you had end game equipment? double? triple?
and how useful were in caps with bolties when enemy had ppsh? simply giving even playing field matters a lot. i dont have problem with skilled players going against newbies if they have same equipment. problem i have is when skilled players with end game equipment go against newbies with starting equipment. newbies simply dont stand a chance in that case. and if you had some fps experience before, simply having same weapons will give you good fighting chance.
Sorry but No.
2 Likes
Yea don’t destroy historical accuracy, it’d make the game less immersive and look more funky. Enlisted matchmaking is fine as is, please don’t destroy historical accuracy…
12 Likes
I definitely love the Matchmaking based on equipment, I would love to have starter weapons fighting against or alongside end game weapons.
Remember folks, starter weapons can 1 shot, end game weapons don’t.
1 Like
and i still dont see evidence that t-50 was used in moscow from your screenshots. there is no mention of t-50s in 4th nor 22nd tank brigade. and while you show screenshots of t-50 were included in 150th, i dont see them near moscow. also what is the source of those numbers, cause only available combat service record for t-50 that i could find was in leningrad.
1 Like
99% of the forum complains go around no humans on match and unbalance.
They provide a system where you gonna queue with people more and will bring more players with the same gear type as you. Bring bolts, expect bolts against you. Not tigers.
Community rage. Because a tank will apear on a virtual map inside a game
You guys sometimes are fucking idiots
The horizontal campaign would never work on the long run
The division of queue would never work on the long run
The multiple grind for the same gear would never work on the long run.
This just makes life so much better for the players.
Then, they can make historical matches with historical squads on customs, and you guys can be happy knowing a jumbo didn’t push into normandy but, will apear on Omer for example.
14 Likes
7 Likes
Hey. Hey. Stalingrad has always prided itself on historical accuracy!
There are people who only play the eastern front - Moscow and Stalingrad. Sometimes even Berlin. these players refuse to play Tunis, Normandy and other maps. The Eastern Front is the best for them. And for this reason, they also buy premium units from the eastern front. I don’t want to play map rotation…I would like the Eastern Front. I’m sure I won’t be alone.
Maintain historical accuracy…This is why Enlisted has always been different.
11 Likes
it was used in soviet-finnish war and according to “The Rifle Story: An Illustrated History from 1756 to the Present Day” it was presumed that most of them were expanded or destroyed during that war.
2 Likes
And used in Winter War only.
1 Like
I read no separate tree for Italians and British, you have 80% of the equipment for both faction altready in game. The laking vehicle you could take the model from War Tunder. I was already dreaming of Italians in the Eastern Front and British in Normandy, i made this Italian tree just to prove the point.
2 Likes
*for now
I agree, uninstalled and play isonzo or hell to lose
So, at the very, very least:
Every map should have weapon/vehicle limitations one way or another.
This is the perfect chance to get rid of MKB, Pz IV F2, Fedorov, T-50, etc. from Moscow and make sure they never appear on those maps.
Neither should Italian or “low level” Berlin equipment appear on Moscow maps.
MP 3008, for instance, should have a big letter B next to it indicating that it can only appear in the Battle of Berlin, and in every other campaign ir will be automatically replaced by the closest thing (e.g. MP-40).
Or, even bettwr, rework the “pick your gear before the battle” system as a whole.
Look at Battlefield 1 even - in Russian Civil War maps you can only choose Mark V tank and not A7V or St Chamond.
Similarly, allow us to select the weapons while in the spawn screen:
On certain maps the “time travelling” equipment will be just greyed out and unavailable for use.
Thus Crusaders would not be available in the Pacific and MP 3008 would not appear anywhere but in Berlin.
2 Likes
If i can no longer decide on which front i will play for each game, i will quit the game.
If the Battlefields will be randomly mixed and there are only the same Weapons on every one of them, i will quit the game.
I have seen this in so many games. Weird decisions for more Profit.
On top of that since yesterday i have lost all motivation to play enlisted at all.
For what, until this update comes out?
Everything that i have achieved so far will change.
When will it change the next time?
I am very disappointed.
4 Likes
i think most people are just raging cause they will not be able to seal club as easily as before and could now expect actual opposition to their OP toys… but you know, “historical accuracy” is such a easy catchphrase. did they have problem with it when they could equip 3 squads full of smg-s? when historically squad looks like this
or then having historically inaccurate weapons like jumbo, fedorov, f2, etc. present in campaigns where they were not part of.
or having historically inaccurate guns with different stats across campaigns, or even historically inaccurate gun damage from same bullet. nobody was complaining then? well there were few voices on forum, but simply most people didnt care. but disable people from easily seal clubbing with their end game equipment and you have a revolt…
if people want to play moscow, simply take low level weapons and they will mostly not have a problem with historical inaccuracies cause they will be matched against other people with low level weapons.
7 Likes
Agreed with everything you said.
I feel the same pointlessness, no reason to play anymore for the time being until this splash of ice water of an updates comes even if it’s half a year away.
As I understood the devblog your most leveled campaing sides will correspond to the new ‘‘army system’’ being added.
Finished Axis in Normandy, after this reworked progression no Axis left to grind? Except perhaps some levels for Italy/Japan if they are split off?
Finished Allies in Tunisia, same as above.
Finished Allies in Stalingrad.
What more will there be to do in grinding if your maxed campaigns are removed and translated into to maxed armies in this rework?
Yeah freedom to choose maps is a must. That will be the dealbreaker for me, I only play a single front for a day or sometimes a week or a month because I’m in the mood for it, only that setting and no mixing fronts, I don’t want some Moscow winter warfare when I want to play sunny Tunisia.
2 Likes
So people are idiots because they complain about things they don’t like.
3 Likes
Seperate loadouts for each campaign with weapon restrictions based on time frame of the campaign. Historical inaccuratecy problem solved while still combining all the queues of a faction.
5 Likes