Apparently only idiots come across against me. Haha. Never had 25 deaths in a match.
the first game you were playing basicaly against bots, the 2nd is credible 16 deaths with semi automatic guns and 220 kills against a decent enemy.
but this doing 100 kills win with only 4 man squads an bolt actions against a decent high lvl enemy team is not realistic
yes, I killed 100 people with BA and won mg34, mp43 and fg42. I don’t see any problems. Complaints about players with a high level should be resolved by having a couple of players with a level of 20-30, a couple of 10-20 and the rest in each team.
1 Like
Just keep these changes in Stalingrad alone, If people love it that much they can play in that campaign . Same goes for the MG change and lighing etc; I’m sure with all the awesome new balance and features Stalingrad must be the most popular campagin in enlisted rn. Also can we roll-back the semi nerf as well? You can keep that top-tier most requested weapon balance in Stalingard thx.
2 Likes
not sure if i would have fun getting destroyed by a single shot from tank mg’s over and over 
1 Like
Finally someone said what I said. Yes, leave people free to choose. Some liked it, I absolutely did not.
I don’t mind there being new campaigns like this if people want to. But I oppose changes to the campaigns that already exist.
if they work a litle more into this idea, and they deliver it to all campaigns. would you quit? adapt?
1 Like
Yes, I will quit the game right away, although I have played 1,800 games during the year
I like the current gameplay and my friends (we are 6-8 people). I’m not a fan of masturbating bolt action rifles. I already do it at level 1-10 every campaign, why would I want to do it the whole game?
Now there are SMGs with great recoil, which is difficult to control without perk and habit, machine guns even more so.
My friend is not a pro shooter, but a little used to handling SMGs, although she still likes rifles better. If the recoil becomes 1.5 times higher, as in Staligrad, she will not be able to play. The recoil in Enlisted without fighter perks is pretty aggressive as it is.
Machine guns I’m not talking about at all. Have you tried Breda? She’s going all over the place. It’s already a controversial thing in Normandy, so why does she need to constantly lose stamina while aiming, even more recoil?
I’m fine with the idea that some campaigns might have a different balance/mechanics, I’ll go play them for that. But don’t touch the places where it’s already good.
I don’t understand why machine guns need more weaknesses. I play to win as much as possible and have studied many things in the game. I can tell you for sure - the machine gun is very bad in a solo game, as you may not get where you need to be in time. Enlisted is about time management, a rookie waits 9 seconds for his soldier to heal himself after knocking. The normal player will immediately switch to the next one.
Each campaign gives a different experience. Tunisia - lots of snipers, artillery strikes, Normandy - concentrated battles, very strong (too) aviation, Berlin - cqc, Moscow - I do not understand, a strange sandbox. Let Stalingrad be a different place too, rather than everything becoming like Stalingrad
1 Like
Get good.
1 Like
Are bolt actions your ideology/fetish or something? Why such attitude towards automatics, never managed to level up for it? It supposed to be better than BA in every way, not to mention that every sane person picks recoil perks, rest of them useless for the most part.
So I assume you are also carrying 4 medkits or something. Basically a walking undead with hp regen is not a dogshit cringe for you, but someone who has a chance to survive a shot once troubles you so much?
No I just like using historically accurate weapons. Every nation besides America’s standard issue rifles were bolt actions.
it would be nice to help crush the meta of automatics in the others
4 Likes
Now you get destroyed by two shots.
And with 800rpm it’s not a big difference.