honestly why. the F-2 is now objectively worse than the F-1. i know that the MiG sucked, but i dont care. buff the MiG instead
fighters without bombs/rockets are just so fucking bad. especially when the F-2 was only marginally better when it had bombs. there is no point in using it! the F-1 have almost the same guns, exactly the same flight stats, AND IT IS ABLE TO ATTACK THE GROUND. why would i ever use the F-2 now???
When did they removed the bombs? On this update ok, so trash. Like you said there is no point to play the F2
“oh no the MiG is worse than the Yak. what will we do?”
“i dont know, fucking make the F-2 worse than the F-1 aswell. that will fix it”
its so fucking stupid
i hate planes so they can shit on them all they want
i would like to respond to this comment in a way i would deem fit. but i would most likely get banned if i do so, and that is not too fun
and i reckon that if you dont see what is wrong with that statement, there is really no point
no the problem is u have a bunch of idiots that spam planes then ram ground so if they shit on planes they deserve it
ah yes. all those plane spammers who get 500 kills a game with 4x50kgs
this was never a problem with fighters buddy
dont matter planes should be removed there game breaking and pointless
oh you are one of those. i also got killed by a tank once earlier today, therefore i declear that they shall be removed forever. and everyone who has ever killed me should be perma banned
thats not what im saying it has nothing to do with dying. they spam them to no end there game breaking and should be removed i dont want plane user to be banned just remove them
i’ll start by saying i’m not really against the change.
like, i used to run the F-2 and the bombs were nice, although a fighter’s job is not to bomb, but what i’m particular against, is the reason that has been assigned to.
" just because the opponent does not have bombs ".
and by this logic, the:
" Grand should not be a thing since it has two guns and a machinegun weather the Semovente has no mgs and only one cannon " logic type.
if not:
" the PZ IV/70 over berlin should not have the mg as the russian counterpart does not have it ".
or just like in normandy where the
" p 47D 28 should not carry bombs as the german counter part ( FW 190 A ) does not have bombs "
BS.
i would not say i completely disagree with this. but the problem is the F-1 is able to bomb making it a better alternative
the logic is shit though and the change most likely happened because of outrage on the russian forum (would be nice if someone who speaks russian could confirm or deny this)
It could also work like this “Sherman was given m61 because the panzer 4s have APHE”
well, if we discuss about ammo shells, you’d open another pandora box that will never end.
but yeah, we got the main " idea ".
I was only talking about the normal Sherman since jumbo is fine with keeping m72
i know?
They remove the bombs of the F2 because they care about the balance cause the Russian plane don’t have bombs but when the axis got the Beretta M38 with 20 ammo and 600 rate of fire for assaulter III against the PPSh41 with 73 ammo and 1100 rate of fire, where is the balance update? They don’t do shit.
There bad choice of “balance” are only about what they like and what they prefer, not even about balance. Unprofessional at all even a idiot can understand there is a problem.