Well, that is… troublesome information. With this speed of big (or any) updates open beta is not going to have a good launch…
How did you find that information???
…?
you dont have to put …?
I didn’t read the whole tread
I have to put in something for the forums to allow me to post the message.
Wipe is possible. However, we will not take your premium squads and twitch drops from you.
The goal of CBT is: testing game systems, when its over we can change the progress-system and that can cause wipe.
Wipes after CBT are very common in all games.
Oh god PLEASE change the progression system.
I’m not sure opposed to it now, but I wouldn’t be opposed to a different one.
I actually prefer Moscow to Normandy because with Normandy’s lack of progression you have no reason not to quit every battle that isn’t going well.
That… is true. I found myself leaving battles often simply because I know there is no penalty for me. Now imagine more of “Eloroses” in team who would just say “screw it” and effectively doom the team even if there was a chance to win, after running out of nerves.
Changing how current progression system work is still preferable option over having none because of that. Players in pvp games are notoriously known for the need of motivation to stay even in not ideal situations.
Maybe if you had teammates to begin with, this would be an issue.
But in moscow, you often dont
Well… in Normandy I often had, but there is simply no need to stay. In Moscow I stay playing loosing team simply because I want “at least something out of it”.
To what? Until there is a consensus on what to change it to, they cannot change it lol, so please stop complaining about them not changing it. (What they mean by changing is likely reorganisation with some minor changes lol.)
Where did you see that the Open Beta was scheduled for February? I never noticed :o
Reorganisation with minor changes would actually be acceptable enough for OBT if it includes (player, not cash grab potential friendly) changes in too RNG driven upgrade system.
Sure they can, they own the game.
Anything that is not this RNG bullshit works for me.
…?
At this rate I’m expecting you to say we need to switch to manual lobbies because matchmaking isn’t predictable
what???
If the community haven’t reached a consensus about what they want it to change to, the devs cannot put the work in to change it since the chances are the community will feel the same or worse about it, hence it is completely pointless lol.
So instead of continually asking for a change, how about you continue discussions on what it should be changed to until a consensus is reached, or better yet, stop going on about it when there is zero evidence they will monetise it poorly, if they do, then you can complain, but until then, either be constructive, or stop going on.

If the community haven’t reached a consensus about what they want it to change to, the devs cannot put the work in to change it since the chances are the community will feel the same or worse about it, hence it is completely pointless lol.
They changed the MGs to Madsen/ZB36/MG13, without anyone in the community asking for that. Don’t think everybody liked these changes.

So instead of continually asking for a change, how about you continue discussions on what it should be changed to until a consensus is reached
Last time I checked the devs did have a brain of their own and are capable of coming up with ideas for themselves. We had a massive ammount of people complaining about the current system before the playerbase practically died. Before you go on about it isn’t dead, look at the current threads per week, and how it used to be quadruple that back when CBT started. We also did not have issues filling up Soviet teams back then.

stop going on about it when there is zero evidence they will monetise it poorly
HELLO??? PREMIUM SQUADS??? Dont go telling me you think the premium squads are perfectly fine. So far, in the poll, a mere 17% voted that they were okay, 38% voted for total removal, the rest voted for nerfs.