Why Enlisted Has Failed

So many people will note that the server population for Enlisted is quite low, and this mostly comes down to bad dev decisions that I’ll cover briefly. These are just my opinions and mostly me venting my thoughts to see what others think.

  1. Mixing weapons from different nations across campaigns.

Some of this was obviously bound to happen, with Germany fighting in Berlin, Moscow, and Normandy, they would need to have some of the same gear. However, the introduction of the Battle of Tunisia, which was supposed to feature Britain vs Italy was just a copy paste of guns already in game with a handful of new ones added in. Not because these nations used the same guns, but because of the terrible dev decision to use these nations weapons in other campaigns when there were literally dozens of different unique firearms they ignored. This made a “new campaign” feel not new at all. And don’t even get me started on how every single campaign uses a stuka. This is just going to continue for every “new campaign” they add. It will feel like a copy paste, except for maybe a pacific campaign. It has truly dug the devs into a hole they can’t dig themselves out of.

  1. Terrible balancing

When it comes to balancing this game, the devs have been slow to get it done at the very least. This includes aircraft balancing where it took them months to do anything to fix planes being able to wipe whole teams. One side being generally stronger than the other (I’m looking at you Tunisia Campaign). And it includes some of their solutions to lower TTK (time to kill) by making most guns unable to hit the broadside of a barn. Some of the balancing they’ve done has been great, but a lot has been flawed in time taken to fix or just questionable balancing decisions in general.

  1. Matchmaking

This games matchmaking is hands down some of the worst I’ve seen. I can find a match in 3 seconds every time. Great, until I play for a minute and realize half my team is bots and most of the remaining players quit in the first few minutes. And the join in progress time is only for 30 seconds, not even in the first five minutes or so to actually let people fill in. Overall the matchmaking in this game has been bad.

  1. Unhistorical Additions

This without a doubt varies for person to person. But some of the weapons/vehicles should not be in the game due to not being used in that campaign. And for weapons that were used after that campaign it leads to massive powercreep Jumbo Sherman cough

  1. No attempt to balance the strongest weapons (late game rifles used by regular infantry)

While this somewhat ties in to my earlier suggestion, this is important enough to get its own category. There has been no attempt to really limit these. Full squads running around with FG 42s on Normandy is not even close to balanced. And there have been tons of suggestions on how to fix this that have been completely ignored by the dev team.

  1. If you don’t play, you can’t contribute

Requiring players to have to play two matches a week to be able to post thoughts on the forum is ridiculous. Just have a notification indicating that player hasn’t played since X day would suffice. That way if someone is talking about something people can see they don’t know what they’re talking about. But punishing players who take a break or step away from the game because they dont like the current direction the game is going means you lose those voices. This means the game will keep driving those players away instead of encouraging them to come back. I’ve mostly stopped playing, and them kicking me out of the community as a result ( I couldn’t post for a few months because I stopped playing a month or so after Berlin release) really kills my motivation to play their game.

I’m sure theres a lot more than this but these were the big 6 that stood out to me over the past year of experiences. Let me know what you guys think about this

20 Likes

ok

4 Likes

To me I think you want to go and play HLL instead of Enlisted.

3 Likes

Not quite failed, surely is transforming in an arcade game.

Some dislike it some not.

1 Like

How do any of my suggestions indicate I want to play a different game?

Because you are forgetting this game is still in beta. Its a F2P game…

1 Like

So because its in beta (which is a questionable title considering how they’ve met all their goals for campaign releases and the game has been out for over a year now) that means I can’t criticize the game and if I do I should go play another game, even when my criticisms are valid? Okay nice “talk”

1 Like

Are you going to headbutt anyone that disagrees with your critics?

This, for example, I can’t agree with. At all.

Are you REALLY telling us that you would be totally ok if YOU were sent by the matchmaker into a match that’s been running since 4-5 minutes, where one side has already clearly gained a upper hand? Maybe when you had a booster on?

It’s not like they ask you to pay gold to post on the forum. This “issue”, if it can be called such at all, is definitely one of the least relevant possible reasons to complain about.

The rest of your thoughts are opinions, none of which I either agree or disagree enough to feel the need to elaborate further.

6 Likes

It would be an opt in/ opt out option. Not mandatory. But it would help. And even still, if half the match is bots, just increase wait time by a little so we get actual full lobbies.

I’m saying it contributes to destroying the community and has noticeably decreased forum participation.

Apparently when someone tells me to go play another game and I shouldn’t comment my thoughts I cant respond in any form or else I’m “headbutting” them.

1 Like

yep.

i can relate to all of them to be honest.

1 Like

You never played CBT Moscow huh?

1 Like

No you can critique the game all you want. I do I just did. We have to keep in mind that it is stil lin Beta thats all.

2 Likes

Oh Just f#ck off with the “BuT bEtA” argument.

3 Likes

Calm down bruv, no need to go full retard.

2 Likes

You dont know anything about the Alpha and CBT state of the game and didnt even read the website of the game/ how DF advertises the game…

yet you(try to) talk about things which are just wrong.

So I can critique the game all I want, but at the same time I have to remember its still in beta so me critiquing how the devs have handled the game is not allowed and I should go play a different game? Very interesting.

One statement that shows the difference between criticism and whining.

Normandy has always been imbalanced.
Berlin has had some serious balance issues (Panzer IV vs T-34-85)

But Tunisia?
Absolutely not, Tunisia is just braindead players with no equipment being at a real advantage…

I watched this window-licker driving in circles in the spawn for half of the battle, and then drive straight past an A13 that was facing the other direction, crash into a tank wreck, and start scanning the opposite direction of all of the combat.

Every Axis team I’ve gotten in Tunisia today has been completely beyond redemption, and would lose if they had FG-42s and Tigers against a team of berdans.

3 Likes

You forgot the so called “AI” which is a major failure and each update they are making it dumber :slight_smile:

i dont necessarily blame them
you cant acutally look out in the AB 41-you only have gunner/driver view, making it blinder than most tanks
combine that with it being possibly the first time and you are bound to get a disaster

Custom battles have proven that the AI is more competent than 50% of the playerbase.

4 Likes