Why Battle of Berlin's FG42 II have 0.42 precision, but Allies' Federov Auto gun only 0.35?

I think it’s unfair, Federov is a SMG in game, but FG42 II is an Auto Rifle,but an SMG’s precision is better than rifle is really crazy.
So, can we make FG42 II’s precision Better AND FIX NEW ACTION SYSTEM’S LOT OF FREAKING BUG

It’s one of the games many bias’s towards Soviet gun, generally speaking they are either

-More accurate then the Axis alternative
-Have more damage
-Have a drum

It’s a monumental pain, since it’s pretty much a fact the devs will never once address jt

8 Likes

or… just or, fg42 can be used on multiple classes and fedorov is limited to assaulters.

who knows…

1 Like

Nice

2 Likes

AVS is also notable more accurate…

1 Like

4 Likes

I’m not gonna lie, I didn’t know Federov rifle before I played Enlisted.
For me the STG44 was the best weapon during WW2.

7 Likes

It was but, dev are biased as fuck, “the glorius motherland gun are better than those of the fascist comrade”

2 Likes

Because fg42II is avs40 counter not fedorov counter, idk what you want, fg42II is a semi-auto able to do the machinegun work not an assault rifle

Well. If it should do that, it would get worse accuracy.

The game is to biased for that

Ever heard of russian bias. Exactly.

2 Likes

Only if its a German gun.
Soviet would be nazi-bias.

Reason ? Well soviets are known for high-tech quality stuff and germans were known for not so high-tech stuff but rather used quantity over quality unlike master soviets.

besides ppsh has too much bullets & rof this balances it out

And if you kill the ennemy too fast, they can respawn faster too, making so you have to kill even more ennemy to win the game.
That’s also why PPSh is worst.

3 Likes

The ppsh41 is worst because the ppd40 have only less 100rof than him, same stats,and look better, imo you should decide to use only one of the two gun and spare order for assault rifle

So fedorov shouldn’t be in a WW2 game

Avtom saw hardly usage in Winter War where most it not all guns got destroyed, lost or captured by Finns, gun was basically a dust collector for 15 years and only 13k were produced from 1913 until 1925.

At best, its a Moscow gun which can be justified by “Soviets used everything they found”, at worst yes it shouldnt be there.

2 Likes

I believe the soviets used more sophisticated word, expended.
Complicated as fk weapon, no spare parts and if I recall soviets didnt exactly produce 6.5x50 themselfs.

Think its more like direct response to Mkb42.
Much like M38 was response to ppsh. With that exception fedorov is worse response than m38 to ppsh.
As it

it is well known that weapons made of stalinium are superior weapons.

4 Likes